You must log in or register to comment.
And neither of these entitled fat boys have served a day in their wretched lives.
well. Vance served as a marine corps journalist for a six month tour of duty in Iraq. which is almost worse. he’s probably ruined the life of someone he knew personally
Eh, Vance was a mil journalist in Iraq for 6 months but he never saw real combat
Oh man, i’m an iraq veteran and i assumed he saw some action. A lot of us did. Looking at his awards and medals though it’s clear you’re right. Guy was a fobbit.
He said that he didn’t, he also stated that he was very lucky that he didn’t
“I was lucky to escape any real fighting,” he said in his 2016 memoir. (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cze5gzr97ewo.amp)
Why would anyone care about how many veterans they’ve fired when trump already called them all losers and suckers. This is a man who posed in front of their graves with a thumbs up and a smile.
I’ve only ever seen one face.
Are they firing veterans at a higher rate proportional to the people they’ve fired than any other administration in history?
I mean, I believe it. But, source?
Wank, frogs and obtuse!
Sure? Not even Truman?
I’m going to need some context on that thought. A skim of his wiki doesn’t mention mass firings or veteran’s issues. Truman served and saw combat in WWI as an artillery captain. As president he desegregated the army and dropped nukes on Japan. He also oversaw the Berlin airlift and part of the Korean war of 1950-1953.
They may be referring to the fact that by ending WW2 Truman cost all of the fighters their jobs? I’m hoping the comment was tongue-in-cheek.
The US military was reduced by 10.5 million people due to the end of WW2.
That’s not firing a veteran, that’s creating one