- cross-posted to:
- TooDumbToImagine@europe.pub
- cross-posted to:
- TooDumbToImagine@europe.pub
You must log in or register to comment.
Given the average answers I get from AI, i dare to bet he won’t even begin an affair if naked woman start throwing themselves at him.
Technically, he has to be in a committed relationship to have an affair anyway.
He (was) in a relationship with somebody who should be committed. Does that count?
Technomancy
Shadowrun is now, old man
Shadowrun is old now, man
sad omae noises
It seems that the woman has a penchant for believing mystical guidance. “A few years ago, she visited an astrologer and it took a whole year for her to accept that none of it was real,” the husband said.
That should’ve been the first clue. I can date someone who engages in fantasy for a bit, but if they never come back to reality then just put the relationship down humanely.
I wonder if modern stupid is funnier than ancient stupid
Some things never change.
My ex-wife used tarot cards to justify cheating on me, and then leaving me.
I didn’t even know she had tarot cards.
It is amazing what excuses cheaters will use to justify their behavior.
In my case, my ex did the nature documentary argument way before the manosphere became a thing. I dunno why that is a pattern with that sort of man. They like to think of themselves as superior intellectuals until it comes to sex, then they will make graphs and studies and be pseudo David Attenboroughs to justify that their caveman urges are too strong for them to overcome.
I guess the female version of that is tarot cards, coffee grounds and zodiacs? I hope you found a better lady later, because that one surely wasn’t worth keeping in your life!
Well, it’s probably true. Their urges are too strong for them to overcome. But that’s what an adult should be able to do, overcome the fucking urges
Exactly. But cheaters love pretending their urges are mystical forces, not a failure to act like grown-ups. Funny how that “strength” vanishes when accountability’s involved.
Chatgpt is awful for people who have delusions.
Chatgpt is awful
for people who have delusions.Hallucination feedback loop
Halulu delulu looloopoo
For people who don’t have delusions yet, it can give them one or three
That’s a great question!
good for him
when my crazy ex left me, in retrospect, she made me a favor
Someone makes a cake, or a house. They DO you a favor.
Well…maybe she made him a party favor? Tied him to the bed, and put a blinding hood on him, then injected liquid viagra into his veins every 4 hours, and invited the whole neighborhood over to pass him around. With him never even knowing who he had sex with, and who fucked him in the ass…
See? She made him a favor!
What? It’s already been established that the ex IS crazy. Loraina Bobbitt did far worse, and she wasn’t even crazy…kinda justified actually.
she made her bags
I’ve packed you a cake
You baked me a favor! 😊
bake him away, toys!
Bean a why ale
Here’s a litmus test to use when deciding to correct someone’s English online: did you understand what they meant?
Yes? Leave them alone.
No? Ask for clarification, then leave them alone.
A lot of non-native English speakers use online communication to practice and most want to be corrected so they can improve.
A lot of native English speakers make mistakes accidentally, or speak with a dialect and some of them get really angry when people try to correct them.
It’s sometimes tricky to know which is which. The best solution is for everyone to just be kind to each other but…
This is the internet. There’s no room for kindness here!
/s, but a lot of people do think that way
I think correction is fine, as another comment said it’s a good way to get feedback and learn.
The problem with this comment for me was the condescension and the rudeness.
I didn’t read it that way. It’s just blunt, which is a bit rough to some people, but what do you see as condescending? asking because i could almost have made this comment, but probably would not have
(I am not a good communicator so i really want to understand why you feel it was that way)
This is of course subjective. For me the style of the correction felt like something a strict elementary school teacher would say to a kid.
Many babies turtle love! Me? Seaworld, see world.
Asparagus!
Why use lot word when few word do trick
Why use big words when a diminutive one will do?
Style, fun, and precision.
Why create an aversion to communicating? That feels gross to assume people won’t understand just because a word has a lot of letters
Checked out name.
deleted by creator
Assume. Presume implies you have some reason or evidence for that belief.
Edit: I find it hilarious how many people are downvoting me for correcting somebody who has just said they appreciate corrections.
If “having a reason” is ok to use it, then good people existing is a pretty good reason, thus you failed at correcting them.
deleted by creator
So you responding to my message to complain about the content, what’s the test for that? You just follow your gut? Or do you have some annoying advice you’d like to give me on when to best give annoying advice?
There are plenty of people, myself included, who prefer to be corrected, because otherwise how will we learn? If nobody corrects us, we’ll keep making the same stupid mistakes.
If someone doesn’t want to be corrected, they are free to ignore it and to continue doing it wrong.
Aren’t you a funny one eh?
If you find it funny to help people understand how a language works?
Absolutely, either this story is made up, or that woman is insane.
No need to be insane, a lot of people fell for the whole Goop “natural healing” bullshit
…
I mean, have you never met religious people before??!!
“If you ever masturbate, my imaginary friend will set you on fire forever!”
You can just say “Christian”, you know.
Not unique to Christians.
Lot of imaginary sadists out there.
Such as?
Bad for the kids…
“I laughed it off as nonsense,” he said. “But she didn’t. She told me to leave, informed our kids about the divorce, and the next thing I knew, I was getting a call from her lawyer.”
Seems like an easy custody battle but hey you never know
Easy for a man to get custody of the kids? What world do you live in?
My friend’s ex repeatedly crashed her car while drunk with their daughter in the car and he had to fight a pretty much non-stop court battle for over a decade to maintain his 50%.
that why I said you never know
basically the same for me and my sisters with our parents. Dad in the army and mom is robbing walmarts to pay for crack. Hmm, mom gets summer custody it is!
Stupid people deserve to be alone, and the guy dodged a bullet
This is about as psychotic as governments using AI to predict crimes.
Not necessarily. I think that predicting crime using public information can be beneficial. It just shouldn’t be invasive or biased, and shouldn’t be used in court to justify a warrant or arrest.
I agree with you, but:
invasive, biased, used in courts
All those things that will soon happen whether we like it or not.
You are aware that “it shouldn’t be invasive or biased” automatically removes every AI, right?
I’m speaking about the concept not the currently available AI.
Let’s not kid ourselves. Publicly available information is invasive and a violation of privacy.
We have corporations who have effectively set up mass surveillance networks and they call it “adtech”.
There is an entire economy surrounding “publicly available information”. There are corporations that act as as data brokers and people search websites that compile way too much sensitive information about private individuals. Newspapers systematically report on events that aren’t really of public interest concerning private individuals; e.g. arrest records and these articles hang around forever even if the arrest doesn’t result in a conviction or the crime is expunged.
If this was employed by the government or law enforcement, it would absolutely include data that extends far beyond the reaches of publicly available information — and it’s worth pointing out that the US has a mass surveillance network in the form of the NSA/PRISM.
There is zero way you could convince me that AI, prone to hallucination, would be well served to predict crime or criminals. Even if it didn’t hallucinate, it still wouldn’t be possible to predict crime — only potentially anticipate a crime. We aren’t 2D characters following a script — anything can happen.
Law enforcement is already very unhinged. Let’s not cheerlead the addition of any tools that aid in psychosis to their arsenal.
This why I stay away from astrology girls.
Tf
AI tasseography – a form of divination that interprets shapes left by tea leaves (or sometimes coffee grounds or wine sediment) after a cup is drunk.
So. Instead of just, idk, feeding ChatGPT all known details of the SO and maybe a dump of their messages or whatever and actually have a chance of it giving you a proper answer…they… just gave it a pic of a drunk coffee cup‽ Wtf is wrong with people
You’re a reaaaal asshole if you feed your SO’s messages to a third party corporation
Even then ChatGPT would just give you an answer based on the wording of how you asked the question to try and agree with you.
Good for him.
Honey, how about a nice hot cup of Minority Report?
Well it technically did, only due to the fact he had an absolute idiot wife.
