Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square129fedilink
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoReally, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoIt’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoEh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
minus-squareGloomy@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoThe Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Really, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
Tell that to a dildo
Yours can talk?
…yours can’t?
It’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
Eh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
The Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.