I found this thought funny. A few years ago everyone was all learn to code so you don’t lose your job! Now there wont be any programming jobs in 10 years. But we will need a lot of manual labor still.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Learn To Code hype was being driven by employers to create a work surplus to drive wages down. Now those same employers think they can use AI instead.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Any new construction job is going to crash because no one will have any money to build new anymore. I’m already seeing stalled projects near me. Not that I have a big problem with that. They like to cut down and cleared trees to build a warehouse instead of tearing down old buildings.

        • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Large corporations will always have the money. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of them get so large they start forming in-house construction companies, initially offering above market pay and benefits, to attract large teams of workers and undercut existing independent (often unionized) construction services. The competition forces the indie union shops to shutter or sell, and now, in control of the entire workforce, the corporations slash the wages and benefits as the workers no longer have other places to apply to.

          Race to the bottom, baybeeee

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been hearing that line for more than 20 years. Anytime there is a tech downturn you hear it loudly - this has happened several times since 2000. However the fact remains that most coders make far more money than most people in construction. The exceptions tend to be people who own their construction business - though if you do the paperwork construction is one of the easiest businesses to work for yourself in once you have skills.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    As soon as I graduated, ‘too many people are fighting for IT jobs, depressing salaries, meanwhile we’re paying plumbers $100/hour.’

    That was 2001. Almost 25 years later, I recently paid a plumber $300/hour.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      You paid the plumbing company $300/hour. The plumber would be lucky to make $30 of that.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think a lot of colleges clowns are learning that too much supply means.

      Everyone was mocking trades 20 years ago. It was hard to get in to with boomers being boomers.

      But people my age who got into trades are doing quite well, ie they got their own businesses now.

      I am still sucking corporate dick for no raises 🤡

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Man people have been telling everyone about the shortage of people in trades since at least 25 years ago. Every year there is a news outlet saying 150k plumbers are needed, electricians and what not.

        No one had mocked trades. People just follow what they think it’s best for them

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      The plumber wasn’t making that much though. That $300/hr includes a lot of buisness costs - someone needs to pay for the fancy van they drive in, the office workers (which is often private equity backed and has a lot of office staff and CEO that you don’t care about), advertising, and whatever other costs. Plus the plumber often only has 20 minutes of work in your house, but between jobs taking an unknown amount of time, and drive time to the next job they need to charge for a lot of time that they are not working.

  • Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just in time to finish your uni degree which you started 3 years ago then…

    No wonder business is complaining that uni grads are so unprepared and lost.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      In fairness, we’ve been complaining about university graduate computer programmers being nearly useless since as far back as when I was an almost useless university graduate computer programmer. Ha ha.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s a pretty interesting field!

      Surprisingly (considering everyone’s fears of being replaced) - software engineering for construction is rarely profitable.

      The demand is surprisingly low for computers and robots that can replace low paid humans.

      It turns out there’s a metric ton of us humans around, so any replacement for us usually needs to be economical in ways that won’t pay for the necessary metal and plastic and circuits and engineering skill.

  • troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    The use of AI by non-developers to produce code will greatly increase the hourly rate I can charge.

    The number of security holes produced is absolutely fabolous.

    • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Back when I practiced law, I thought the same thing about services like LegalZoom. Thing is, laypeople are terrible at evaluating risk in a professional way. All they see are prices and marketing. Nobody cares about cybersecurity until they get ransomwared AND have a financial motive for preventing it. And most attacked companies now just shrug and hand out a year of credit monitoring from a company no one’s heard of.

        • DireTech@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          That act doesn’t seem to do anything to avoid the shrugging and free year of credit monitoring we get in the US. Until companies are liable for lost data, I don’t see that changing. I bet it’d change in a heartbeat if monetary loss from identity theft could claimed against any company that lost your data in the last year. Individuals wouldn’t even have to do it, banks would automate that and HOUND those companies for payouts since they’re the ones that take the biggest hits.

          • troed@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think you misunderstand how the EU enforces law compared to the US.

      • MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The companies care when it is company money being stolen.

        As an aside, the overlaps between lawyers and tech is huge.

    • Lucelu2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was wondering if the AI would expand the role of humans in the security sector of tech.

  • Demonmariner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m fairly sure the “learn to code” thing was just a media campaign by corporations to assure an abundance of programmers, leading to decreased labor rates. Years earlier it was a push for electronic engineers and technicians.

  • buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    The reactionary “learn to code” nonsense started a lot further back than a few years! Also, who told you there won’t be any software development positions in 10 years?

  • epigone@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    If machine intelligence is indeed a different form of intelligence, then it can be observed and judged on the basis of its own merits, as opposed to a messianic waiting for a moment where it might equal or eclipse (weakly defined) human intelligence. This would even render obsolete the question as to whether or not machines can think—which in itself willfully glosses over the corresponding opposite question, “Can humans think?” posed by the former Fluxus artist (and Emmett Williams collaborator) Tomas Schmit in the year 2000 (Schmit et al. 2007, 18–19). — Crapularity Hermeneutics: Interpretation as the Blind Spot of Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Other Algorithmic Producers of the Postapocalyptic Present. Florian Cramer.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nah, it’s just changed from

    Learn to code

    to

    Learn to AI prompt engineer, bro!

  • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The code will break and they will be back. People are buying into the bullshit until they realize its just marketing and has no practical application

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Interestingly, that’s how it works for construction jobs too!

      Things will break and they will be back.

    • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Doubtful. The oligarch class only needs a handful of good developers to make working code for rich people use. The rest of us are being stuck with half-assed AI slop. They’re trying to carve 99% of us out of the economy (the parts that pertain to them) and relegate us to backbreaking wage slavery. Killing middle class jobs is the point, they think.

      Not saying it’s a good plan, but it sure looks like what they’re trying to do.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re not going to make any money selling to other rich people. They didn’t get rich buying someone else’s trash.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That is the plan. But eventually they will start dying to the same buggy hospital code that the rest of us use, or whatever other issue.

        There’s a billionaire fantasy that they can afford to buy artisinal everything, and not get poisoned by the results of their own stupid callousness.

        I don’t believe it. I do believe they will try, for awhile.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yet it’s not a popular way to do it, and multiple company closed after a few years of operating.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s right. I’ve seen 3d printed houses that were every bit as complete and ready to use as any vibe code program!

      (This is an attempt to humorously point out that both are cool and useful for an actual professional, while useless to anyone not willing or able to actually finish the job.)

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I work in software development but I also have a second job as an arborists offsider because I’m pretty sure trees will never stop fucking growing.