𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Gott'emi.imgur.comimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1imageGott'emi.imgur.com𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square23fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 年前Lemmy should do this automatically on the server to help with our filters. How do we submit a feature request?
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前That would be a pretty expensive feature request.
minus-squareSharpieThunderflare@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前OCR and especially AI image processing takes a lot of computing power, much much more than filtering plain text.
minus-squareqaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 年前Last time I checked tesseract had pretty good performance, but I may be mistaken.
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前You’re right. I’ve preferred it in mobile applications where specialized hardware is not guaranteed and battery use matters. Results are consistent.
Lemmy should do this automatically on the server to help with our filters.
How do we submit a feature request?
That would be a pretty expensive feature request.
Why?
OCR and especially AI image processing takes a lot of computing power, much much more than filtering plain text.
Last time I checked tesseract had pretty good performance, but I may be mistaken.
You’re right. I’ve preferred it in mobile applications where specialized hardware is not guaranteed and battery use matters. Results are consistent.