You must log in or register to comment.
That’s not collapse, that’s just justice. That’s people being held accountable for their crimes. Society is still going to function fine without them, their roles, if they even have any, will just be taken over by the next person in the command structure.
Or, better yet, we (as in society as a whole) can take the opportunity of clearing house to restructure our government (and, by extension, economic) systems to one where corrupt individuals cannot readily acquire hierarchical authority over others and entrench themselves behind layers of systemic powers.
Instead of an electoralist system where we elect representatives to dictate at their discretion which interests they will ultimately support for a federated system of syndicates where each has a set of delegates which have been assigned a specific responsibilities and expectations where, if those individuals are found to neglect their responsibilities, we can readily rescind their power of authority and replace them.
Power must come from the bottom up, otherwise we are slaves to the whims of those who wield authority from on high.
This is such embarrassing fantasy that it’s almost hard to believe that real people believe it, but traitor lunatics thrive on nonsense. This Epstein list is like the pizza parlor conspiracy.
If they can be destroyed by the truth, they absolutely must be destroyed by the truth.
From this point on, reporters should work off of the baseline assumption that everyone who voted not to release the documents are mentioned in the documents. Until proven otherwise.
I hate how hopeful I am. I keep believing that at some point these people on the right are going to wake up and realize what they’ve voted for.
And I am continuously disappointed as they make more and more excuses for the criminal acts their leadership has committed each time they come to light.
=/ I have my doubts
i doubt it, they are “into deep” so they have to double down, or shift to something like “i never supported that.” never have a self reflection to admit thier wrong thinking.
It would in no way impede the stability of society, quite the opposite. Those are the very same people who are responsible for much of the instability. If the US were to start prioritising the public good over the profits of the oligarchy, 99.99% of society would benefit.
Yeah. The only thing I see wrong with this is not doing it. If my reps are kiddie diddlers, or kiddie diddler enablers, I’d like to know so we can kick their asses straight to jail. I don’t really give a fuck if I need to participate in another election.
Trump says it can destroy innocent people? Why would innocent people be against publishing a list of pedophiles?
Here’s Katie Johnson’s testimony on how Trump and Epstein brutally raped her and other 13 year old girls: “Katie Johnson’s full testimony of 2/11/16”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo
I’m amazed it hasn’t spread any more yet.
He’s hijacking the point that victims need to have their identities protected. But instead of victims he means the perpetrators.
The same shitbag that was incessant about naming the jurors in his own corruption cases.
Fuck me I hate how airheaded the masses are.
he was jury tampering, so he can force them to replace the jurors, that way to delay it, and the courts were just giving him what he wants.
Innocent?
Yeah, they’re innocent people who do horrible crimes now and again, as a treat. But they’re “good people™”, so it’s considered very impolite to even suggest consequences for them
As opposed to criminals, who are definitely guilty of something, so it’s fine to punish them with or without evidence of any actual crime
This is genuinely how it works, it’s just cartoonishly obvious now
The worst thing that would happen would be the power vacuum it creates. I can totally see the Democrats splitting and a third party joining in, all fighting over what’s left.
And that would most likely be an improvement.
Like the Panama papers?
Innocent?
If they are innocent, how would releasing the document destroy them?
In trump’s mind, there’s nothing more “innocent” that forcing two underage girls to dress up as maids, force them to perform sexual acts on each other and him, sexually assault them, and then tell them they “performed adequately “ before leaving them
That’s oddly specific…
Specific yes, but not oddly: this is paraphrasing from an actual testimony of victims.
It’s referencing this account. I wish I had a better link than the Daily Mail
Fucking hell I’m in shock. I just can’t believe this at all. There’s no way this happened. The Daily Heil did some serious journalism. The Trump stuff sounds about right though.
Trump will play this one like he’s played so many others: “It’s a witch hunt. They’re making up accusations to smear me. They’ll do anything to take me down because they hate me. They hate you too. See how the woke mob treat people? This is why we must destroy them.”
Allegations of sexual misconduct have a mixed history (at best) of being taken seriously. Unless there is airtight evidence locked up in those files which was specifically composed for the purpose of implicating people, and then sealed for blackmail leverage or something like that, I can’t see any charges sticking to Trump. I mean the fucker is already an impeached convicted felon and self-confessed (on tape!) rapist. His flock will never turn against him.
“It’s good innocent fun that boys do, we have to stop persecuting these men for just doing what all men want!”
This is going to be the pro-pedo narrative that the entire right does their abrupt 180 with.
Because rich people are allowed to rape children. Innocence is bought. Sometimes the language they use just exposes what they really mean. You just have to pay attention.
They’re not dumb. The language and the words they use reveals a lot. They are saying that revealing the worst crimes of the capitalist class will destroy the world because the capitalist class will side with pedophiles before they let the proletariat take their power.
They are saying “don’t make us go full fascist death camps. Revealing this will just lead to us treating the entire population like we have Gaza. We’ll defend our pedophiles if we need to to maintain power”
yes no they won’t get imprisoned, they will just be forced to pay pocket money
I severely doubt society would collapse. I’m even willing to bet that it would begin to flourish. If people with power and control are willing to do these things to kids, imagine what they do to you even now with their executive powers.
I’m seriously wondering that if these people refuse to release the information, it’s time to vote for these representatives with lead next. This cannot be tolerated and we need to ensure people are afraid to commit such atrocious crimes on our young.
You don’t understand. When they say “society will collapse” they mean for them, not for us.
Ah yes, the world will collapse because of a problem that is almost exclusively in the USA.
On an unrelated note, have you ever heard of Americentrism?
The world’s most powerful people going to prison would not cause the collapse of society. That is just not what society is. Even setting aside all hate for the 0.1% and judgments about whether they deserve prison, it’s just ridiculous to say that society depends on them. Who even wrote that line? Ayn Rand’s grandson?
