Genetic incompatibility - the interspecific cross could only occur one way.
This could be human male-neanderthal female (HMNF) coupling didn’t result in fertile offspring right? Could it also be that HMNF (coupling) didn’t result in fertile female offspring, but did have fertile male offspring?
Human genome contains significant contribution from Neanderthals. Because of the location of the neanderthal genes in our genome it can only have come from male Neanderthals.
He says that the data is not illegal to possess only illegal to sell, so it’s not CSAM. Also you don’t ever actually possess the data, you facilitate its sale though.
The data isn’t accessable. The device is listed for sale (including the HDD with data: I’d guess SSNs because it is not illegal to possess another persons SSN, only to fraudulently use it and to sell it etc). If someone managed to buy it (in one of the brief, sporadic windows we can expect it to be for sale) the artist would still have to physically send the device to them before the data was actually in their possession, but by pressing the button you are participating in the operation of an illegal marketplace.
It’s good art. And it’s a good illustration of why minimum sentencing is a bad idea.
The Iranians have not gotten justice. I don’t need convincing that he was a bad dude, but his death doesn’t cement freedom, and imo the attacks reduce stability and prosperity for Iranians.
That’s only the new testament god. The old testament god would do […]
Yeah and that’s the same god that’s also perfect and unchanging right?
I’m communicating by telegraph I can.
At any time
Isn’t it a probabilistic extrapolation? Isn’t that what a guess is?
Hobby tunnelers agree it’s a great escape
I just don’t think there are enough billionaires to justify a move away from artisanal guillotines.
I’m surprised P ended up that high, the amount of autotune in it sounds like AI speech synthesizer with articulation cranked all the way 11 where it just makes random weird sounds
59.1% AI-detection™ score
A small note: that I wasn’t trying to decide whether something was AI, I was trying to evaluate its creativity. So I actually thought A was real, but that it was extremely generic… I also suspected D was AI but trying to judge on creativity, I was unimpressed with the lyrics (not that creative) but I found the soundscape it created interesting. That’s a place where my (un)familiarity with the genre was a liability. I also found the pitch of “you” in “who are you” nrar the end to be creative, like in the wrong key but in a good way.
Also I only listened to each track once, then decided where to put it in the list. Like “top”, “bottom”, “near bottom but not worst”. And I placed them as I went. If I went through the list again I’d probably swap some but that would have taken way longer and I decided it was more important to be done. I probably should have done some spot checks at the end to make sure things ended up where I wanted.
I’ll put it with the Leader beans
With friends like these who needs enemies?
IVQJHOUPLGCFDNERTSMBKA
Great work. A few thoughts re: methodology.
I’m very curious to see the results. Sorry I didn’t get to it sooner.
I’m actually really happy that a journalist reported that they checked and didn’t find anything intetesting.
Fantastic, I’ll try to listen today
So I’m pretty ignorant of the top of the chart I’d be willing to be a guinea pig. Do you want to send me like 3 chart toppers and an AI song and I’ll see which one is most creative? Don’t tell me which is which.
The purpose of my idea is to average 2g without expecting people to function in 2g. Not just for the purpose of a weighted blanket
I couldn’t get it. Neither could my buddy