• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You can’t fact check something that doesn’t provide any of its work. Where did they get those numbers from? What equations did they use, and do they actually apply to this situation? Is the owl flying through a vacuum, through air, through honey? In reality, it would be flying through air, but we have no idea what the equation says it’s flying through, or even if it is flying. Maybe the equation is for cars traveling on a road.

    Since it’s non-falsifiable, you can just disregard it. Claims require evidence, not assertions.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      For starters, the average owl doesn’t weigh 16 pounds, that’s immediately proven false with a simple Google search. The smallest is an ounce, the largest just over 9 pounds.

      On top of that, I can’t find any species that migrates from Europe to America…

      So false from the jump.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem is not just that the numbers are made up, they are in the wrong units. Watts is not a unit of energy.

      It’s like saying; a cow wants to eat an apple. Each apple weighs five liters. Therefore the cow would need a mouth 2 kg across. It would take the cow seven metres to eat the apple.

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is falsifiable, just from a basic bird standpoint. Energy usage and flight speed is listed on allaboutbirds.org and you can calculate the rest just from knowing how birds work (for one, owls don’t really migrate at all, though there are of course exceptions with everything in bird world).

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        But you don’t know if the equation they used was for if the owl is swimming through the deep ocean. That would take a lot of calories.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    All these people in the comments be acting like owls are real when you can easily see how fake the are when you buy them in Home Depot’s gardening department.

  • s@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Owls expel pellets. E = mc^2. By expelling pellets made of matter, owls gain energy that they then use in migratory flight.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Biggest owl weighs up to 10 lbs. (Blakiston’s Fish Owl)

    300kW has dimension J/s and calorie has dimension J. It’s like saying that you would walk 5km/h equivalent of over 200m.

    I will not entertain the notion that they were sloppy with what units they used.

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      They do not … owls are solar powered, that’s why they are nocturnal… DUH.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Owls don’t weigh 16 pounds (except for fat owls). 300 kilowatts is a rate of energy, not a total quantity of energy. 300 kilowatt hours (which is possibly what they meant?) Is only around 260,000 kilocalories (which is called “calories” on food labels because units of measure were made up by humans). According to an extremely naive google search, that would only take an owl 5 years to consume, rather than 10. If the original number were correct, that would mean this owl eats 8,000 calories per day. Which is not typical.

    Onto the broader point, the efficiency of birds in flight is not as simple as this image suggests. There is no (useful) formula that takes the weight of a bird and the distance it will fly and tells you how many calories that takes. Birds can fly at different elevations, at different speeds. They can fly with or against the wind. They can change many things about how they fly to be more efficient or less efficient.

    If you really want to know how many calories it takes for an owl to cross the ocean, first get the owl to the point of starvation, then bring it on a boat to the middle of the ocean. Feed it a fixed number of Tootsie pops, then sink the boat. With nowhere else to land, the owl will be forced to fly to shore. Based on how far the owl makes it, you can determine how far each tootsie pop allowed it to fly, and derive calories per mile from that.

    • three@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      No one ever looks at the community before replying anymore, huh?

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are flying rates for owls, like the barn owl is 80 km/h. Flying from NA to Europe wouldn’t even take more than 100 hours (60 from Boston to Lisbon), so with that it would mean the bird would be spending 3kW of energy, which is just nonsensical.

      All birds have a kJ/d amount, and even with a huge multiplier you wouldn’t come anywhere near the amount in the meme.

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    3 months ago

    An owl emitting 300 kilowatts of power would explode in a ball of flame that would light up the neighbourhood. I’ve never seen this happen, so I do have doubts about the numbers given here.