What older movies made a good use of either side stepping special effects or have effects that somehow still hold up today? Why are they good movies?

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s often hyped as groundbreaking, but that seriously misunderstands what they’re doing. Nothing in Kane is new, it’s Gregg Toland’s homage to the 3D films of the 1930s. Some of the best stuff people don’t even talk about now, like how almost every main character has prosthetics to make them resemble press figures of the time. It’s a satire.

  • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Almost, if not everything, Stan Winston ever had a hand in making. Looking at the new Predator movie out just now, and its all CGI. But back in 87, Stan was creating something that looked so fucking real it was actually scary. Think back even further to 79, and what Carlo Rambaldi, among others, were doing with the “Alien”. Carlo focused on the head of the creature, and fucking hell, it holds up like fucking gangbusters. Carlo would go on to help bring ET to life as well.

    Having less to worth with, made for some VERY smart people to create timeless works of art. Not only using clay, rubber and glue, but light and shadow as well. CGI has made modern Hollywood lazy, IMO. When was the last time a monster actually lived up to the hype once you saw it? I remember back in 2001, watching Jeepers Creepers and thinking it was the best horror movie in years. Then I got to the mid point and they revealed the monster and it… dropped off a fucking cliff.

    Thinking back to Alien, and Carlo engineered the Alien’s head with over 900 moving parts, using a system of cables and hinges to create the lifelike jaw and inner mouth movements. This level of engineering gave the creature a physical presence that actors could react to in real time, rather than a fucking tennis ball and some guy shouting “Now imagine its a big Alien. Its mean looking, its got teeth and eyes, and you’re scared of it.”.

    Only thing I can really think of that matches this level of detail, was the rings trilogy. And you can see the difference when you watch the hobbit. It just doesnt hit as hard because its CGI. And no matter how good CGI is, you can always tell and pulls you out of it a little.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The ridiculous, videogamesque barrel ride pulled me out of the Hobbit completely. I just couldn’t take the movies seriously after that.

  • Masamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    You want old movies? How about Royal Wedding (1951). It has a scene where Fred Astaire dances on the walls and ceiling. There’s no cgi or special effects, it was just done with a simple camera trick.

  • Shanedino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Slightly related but I rewatched robots this past weekend and the animation held up quite nicely for being vintage now.

  • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can find some old Buster Keaton interviews on YouTube where he talks about the craft. Pretty good stuff.

    Terminator, despite being a classic and massively popular movie of the time, is pretty bad by modern SFX & VFX standards.
    The Thing (Jonh Carpenter) for a movie of the same era holds up impressivley well.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Terminator came out around when I was born and I finally got around to watching it tonight.

      I have to give them props for trying with those full-body robot scenes but yeah, they’re rough.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Princess Bride

    The flames are real flames! The R.O.U.S. is a tiny guy in a suit! The giant is… Andre the Giant!

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, the behind the scenes stuff for that movie is wild.

      They had to keep reshooting the fire swamp scene, because Cary Elwes (Westley/Dread Pirate Roberts) kept panicking every time Robin Wright (Princess Buttercup) got lit on fire.

      The R.O.U.S. scene had to be delayed, because they had to go bail the dude in the rat suit out of jail. He had apparently gotten too drunk the night before, and was in the drunk tank on the morning that they were supposed to shoot the R.O.U.S. scene.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jaws.

    The shark prop didn’t work well and looked terrible, which resulted in much of it being left out of the movie. The movie is more terrifying because of this.

  • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    Blade Runner (1982) still looks incredible. The miniatures and attention to detail in design effectively set the tone for subsequent cyberpunk.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    Star wars, with models and miniatures.

    Most great old movies, where cheesy effects were irrelevant next to the story.

    Gravity Falls Little Gift Shop of Horrors, where the characters watch an ‘incredibly expensive’ stop motion scene that we (the audience) only see as reflected shadows.

    • Devadander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Just gave the special editions a rewatch. The cgi inserted scenes have aged incredibly poorly, especially compared to the rest of the 1977 effects

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And matte paintings. Never forget the legendary artists who turned paintings into scenery, or the camera workers who managed to blend in the actors to them.

      • That first legendary pan-down to Tattooine, which the Tantive IV and Star Destroyer then fly past? Matte painting.
      • The sterile hangars and seemingly-bottomless pits of the Death Star? Matte painting.
      • The busy Rebel hangar on Yavin IV? Also a matte painting. I seem to remember reading that some of the hangar floor markings - besides making it look like an actual hangar - served to help align the matte with the set shots and coordinate extras so they wouldn’t accidentally walk out of the filmed segment and behind a matte portion.
  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Gremlins. My brother and I were just discussing this because we heard that the new Gremlins movie will be using analog effects.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      My favorite effect in gremlins is spoken word. Hear me out. The movies aren’t really scary and rely mostly on jump scare effects.

      However the ‘Santa stuck in the chimney’ story is such a powerful, unexpected confrontation with a claus-trophobic (pun trademarked from now on) and disgusting gory event that it makes the whole movie feel so much darker as a kid.

      Trough that scene the whole movie is elevated (in a horror genre perspective) from a funny sorry with jump-starts to something that sticks with you for way longer.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        We live in the timeline that all the other timelines use as a ridiculous example.

        You’re telling me there’s a dimension for EVERY possibility?

        Yup.

        So there’s a timeline where Donald Trump becomes president?

        Twice!

    • stringere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well that takes me back a spell. Great movie. I’d have to rewatch it to assess the effects but I remember them as awesome when I saw it as a kid.