• MotoAsh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably more likely to fire sales people than the dumbass execs that set the targets, too…

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The original sales targets were poor judgement, but isn’t this the best response Microsoft could have had after the fact?

      They realized the targets were unrealistic, significantly lowered them, and didn’t blame the sales people. Many orgs would keep the unrealistic targets and just fire half the sales people

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, yeah. The AI stuff is selling, just not as much as they thought. So you adjust your targets and change your business model to account for that part of the business not doing as well as planned.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Give up. Lemmy understands business… I don’t have a metaphor. They don’t understand business. At all. But yes, that’s how sales targets work.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I wanted to try load one in as an internal knowledge broker, rather than managing a gross knowledge base on SharePoint or some document library or something. Nope. Have to get the license first. I have no idea if it will even do what I want it to do. I made a two page checklist of training items to grade it and I couldn’t even point it to an SP library.

    So obviously I won’t be pushing the org to buy anything. Will wait for some other idiot to do it and potentially get blamed, then do my testing on the back of that. I don’t have very high hopes because Copilot is awful and even failed several times in configuring the agent.