• CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Still not gonna watch it. The poster neither makes it seem interesting, nor does it indicate someone learned from the debacle that was SNW S3.

    Plus that fucking college jacket.

    • rozodru@pie.andmc.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      crap I’ve yet to start Strange New Worlds as “new trek” really doesn’t agree with me but I was willing to give it a shot. so…it turns out bad? The last Star Trek I watched was Picard S3 and I kinda enjoyed it but that was after I struggled through S1 and 2.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Well, imagine releasing an episode depicting how biological essentialism expresses in vulcans while the world revels in fascism and racists trying to tell us how people are hardwired based on perceived ‘race’ and ethnicity.
        Or while civil societies struggle and fight back against lobbyists, radical capitalists, all kinds of power grabbing individuals, releasing an episode literally saying “good systems are good because good people are in charge”.
        Oh, and there’s the speciesist episode.

        Then there’s even more and overt memberberries.

        That’s six of ten episodes. Another episode is the second part of the last episode of season two. The remaining three episodes are okay.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Season 1 of SNW liked to shred canon almost every episode. And binge watching it:

        spoiler

        the serial reveal of a deep dark secret for nearly every member of the bridge crew got old real fast.

        But the cast was good enough that I kept watching. In season 2 we got Carol Kane and a great cross over episode and that’s most of what I remember.

        I got 3 episodes into season 3 and set it down. I’ll probably finish it just before season 4 starts and that will decide if I watch 4 or not. I still haven’t mustered the energy to watch Disco season 5.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        SNW is largely good, but S3 has an unusually high number of goofy/gimmicky episodes that’s aren’t very good.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Also eugenics advocacy, biological essentialism, and some very gross takes from trek overall. Woohoo?

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Jacket looks slick. I’m in favour of leaning more towards civilian higher education aesthetics and away from military ones. After all, aren’t we always being told Starfleet isn’t a military?

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        17 hours ago

        We are told Starfleet isn’t military, but what we are told and how it (often) acts and is structured like always meant an interesting conflict.

        Also, I don’t mind that it looks more like higher edication than military. I mind that it looks too much like what we have nowadays. Star Trek fashion was, though memeable, it’s own distinct thing. Like we don’t do fashion today as people in the 18th or 19th century, why should 23rd or 24th century fashion look like ours?
        ENT played that nicely, those costumes bridged the gap almost perfectly (especially Starfleet uniforms), looking enough like later (in the timeline) stuff but reminiscend of what we have today, like a natural evolution.

        Bur Academy is to be set in 32nd century, it should be as distant to us as the 10th century.

        • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Alright, that’s fair reasoning. I don’t sweat it when a sci-fi future looks oddly contemporary, just like I don’t sweat it when a period piece does the Bridgerton thing of including modern pop songs and printed dress patterns. A little artistic licence doesn’t bother me for stuff like that, but I get the perspective.

  • Bobo The Great@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Please don’t make it a generic US high school drama. There’s already enough US-defaultism in Star Trek.

    Also, the image is glossy, it feels like AI generated

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      It’s just a lot of HDR processing. You get this when you extend curves to maximize range and then crank the vibrancy and definition sliders to the top.

      it looks like AI because the older Stable Diffusion models had flaws that caused them to prioritize vibrancy instead of realism.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Given the time period it was made (ie, now) it’s entirely possible there was some artist who was ordered by a manager to use more AI in their work and was forced to edit the output to try to make it look less like shit.

  • Klanky@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The more I see of this the more I realize that it’s probably not going to be for me. That’s fine, I’ll give it a try anyway.

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    As long as the Ellison’s control Star Trek it will never have a return to form. So this will be as bland as SNW S3 was when Fascism is taking hold all over the world. I feel classic Trek would have something to say about that.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I debated coming in here and saying I wasn’t going to watch this due to Paramount and Ellison, but I decided I wouldn’t. But now here I am, saying it.

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Make Captain Pike kiss a trans woman damnit. Make a fucken statement! It matters that our media does this.

    • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      No chance it doesn’t suck. They aren’t making it for you. They are making it for young people, new audience, so it will be a cookie cutter bs show, with bad acting, no real story with illogical plot holes all around. It will be pointless and cringe.

      These companies are unable to make something good and the proof is that they don’t.

  • Genesis Climber MOSBURGER@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Can’t wait to see all y’alls bingo cards leading up to this show?

    • Character with dark secret past hinted at in Ep 1 and revealed/confirmed in ep 2 or 5.(Maybe a youthful thug, killed someone / accidental death, or related to a legendary character)
    • Pregnancy scare
    • classroom or messhall inspirational speech by the underdog (teachable moment)
    • cameos, verbatim quotes or callouts to major characters or moments in the first 15 mins
    • bad teacher is good / exceedingly nice teacher is season end villain