• Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yesterday I sat across a woman on the subway who had to rapidly tap her smartphone’s screen every few minutes to stop loud video ads.

    Was tempted to lecture her about the existance of adblockers. (But didn’t, following established subway etiquette…)

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    3 days ago

    Playing through Persona 3 Reload at the moment. Not come across this gem yet but I have come across this:

    Telling a child she's at fault for her parents divorce.

  • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Whenever I disable it to access a feature that breaks under it, I remember how cursed these sites have become. Reminds me of just before pop-up blockers were common.

  • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good time to mention this if you don’t already use it, or if you do use blockers, maybe consider this:

    https://adnauseam.io/

    It’s AdBlocker, BUT actually, what it does is “click” on all the ads. Every adclick costs the advertisers, and makes targeting ads meaningless because of all the noise. From your end, nothing has changed, the ads are gone… but from the advertisers end, you’re costing them more money and making their data useless.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not that cut and dry. Yes, it brings the ad industry ever so slightly closer to collapse…

      But until then, you’re just helping Google sell ad buys faster and pumping up their metrics

      Google has gotten fined for doing exactly this fraudulently multiple times to juice their numbers

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Is it reliable? Ad-blocking is a cat and mouse game and to actually have a useable ad-blocker it needs to be well maintained over a long period of time (for example like ublock origin).

      Their concept looks nice, but they are researchers and I’m a bit afraid that they just drop that, write a paper about it and that’s it. If there is no constant maintenance this will likely stop blocking YouTube Ads once Google deploys the next changes.

      Update: checked the repo and it’s actually a fork of ublock origin, so it should (for now) be pretty similar, but still they would have to keep maintaining that.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I miss policeman. It was the best blocker addon. Fine-grained easy control.

    Brave does well.

    For watching video, use a media player (e.g. mpv + yt-dlp). No ads (except what the content creator added to the video itself… in which case, tap the cursor keys to skip, no problem).

    Maybe those who don’t block adverts just don’t know. Like an animal born in captivity. Like a fish oblivious to water. We can escape, we can evolve, show them the better life awaiting them. :)

  • lonlazarus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminds me of talking to a tech bro excited to give Google more information so his ads are more accurately targeted to him.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the ads actually targeted me with things I’d actually like, instead of trying to manipulate me, I’d probably care less. But they don’t, because shareholders want larger margins.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        True… Except there’s a big problem with that

        There’s not many things I would want that I’m not aware of

        So would they going to show me 2 ads a day, or would the same 4 things be plastered everywhere each week?

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re not wrong.

          I would also add to that list “things I didn’t know I wanted”, but that is hard to objectively differentiate from manipulation.

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    For real. No one else in my life uses Adblocker, so when I visit, I’m reminded of how horrible ads have gotten.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Any term we pick is going to be offensive. We’re gesturing at the concept of them being less human than us

        But like… It’s kind of true. It’s like they don’t experience the world around them, they just adapt to it without comment like a Sim

        They just seem like they’re missing the spark. NPC is probably a kinder term than what we’d come up with otherwise

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    My work PC does not have adblock, and I’m always a little culture shocked whenever I am forced to use Edge for something.

  • Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    a lot of judgement here from someone that doesn’t know what a hamburger is

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yep, its disgusting, major red flag, but shockingly common.

    Apparently my standards are too high.