• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I know there are gamer girls on sites like Fansly and OnlyFans that stream their gaming sessions in the same way they would on Twitch. I wonder what the engagement and income is for them on those sites versus Twitch or YouTube.

    EDIT: I just watched Zara Dar’s PornHub video on Loss Functions. Her delivery is a tad robotic but the content is informative.

  • Acidbath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    omfg i remember running into this video like about a year ago. legit good study material :^] (no but fr better than some of my professors). There are also cybersecurity guides but ehh… they all stopped posting.

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This is another sign of how youtube’s story of “we’ve never made a profit” is bogus. More and more organisations are advertising on youtube, youtube is pushing the limits on the amount of advertising that viewers can stand & at the same time they’ve started paying creators less.

    It looks like they’ve really started abusing their market position in the last few years: more income and less expenditure. And it’s probably no coincidence that there are no financial figures for youtube alone.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Does that include the storage costs of the existing exabytes of videos, plus the terabytes of new videos being uploaded every day?

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        21 hours ago

        AWS is incredibly expensive, if you’re hosting something like GitHub or Netflix on them instead of just owning the servers, you’re incredibly dumb

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I found an estimate of annual expenditures of 3.25 billion, without content payouts, but with engineering/legal/moderation costs. As 2024 revenue I found back 36 billion from advertising & 14.5 billion from subscriptions. Forbes had an article where Google claimed to have paid out $70bn in 2021-2023 to content creators, this number probably includes subscriptions. In those 3 years youtube had an ad revenue of 89.5 billion, but I have no number for subscriptions. These are all very opaque numbers. Based on these opaque numbers, I’d guesstimate youtube’s profit margin at 42%, which I find excessive.

        $36bn ad revenue + $14.5bn subscriptions: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/youtube-statistics/

        $3.25bn annual expenditures: https://www.clrn.org/how-much-does-youtube-cost-to-run/

        $70bn payed out to creators from 2021 to 2023: https://www.forbes.com.au/news/innovation/youtube-70-billion-creator-payments/

        Edit, how I got to my guesstimate of 42%:
        36bn ad revenue in 2024. An average of 30bn ad revenue in the 3 years prior. Estimation for the subscription income in those 3 years: 30/36 x 14.5 x 3=36 billion. 73bn expenditures & 126bn income = 53bn profit. 53/126 = 42%.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Also why we hiding the name of the YouTuber? Presumably they actually want people to find their content otherwise they wouldn’t have uploaded it.

      This self-censoring epidemic is getting stupid.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m just imagining a world where YouTube is so shit and pays so poorly that most content creators move to pornhub, and it becomes a respectable place to go to learn stuff and watch video essays, more than porn

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 hours ago

    She’s very suggestive in her choice of dress in most of these videos that are on her pornhub though, so there’s that.

  • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    i really wish someone would makes a great youtube alternative that pays $1-5 cpm, but DOESN’T shut down like blip or vidme. it DOESN’T have to be a cooprative, but it should. seriously!

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I tend to prefer creators who do the donation model (e.g. Patreon). The advertisement and sponsorship models create bad incentives. The donation model can too, but it’s preferable, IMO.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Storing videos, and streaming them without latency is a huge problem. Specifically if you also have to process for different resolutions and such for different devices.

      Edit: I don’t know how true it is now, but in the past YouTube would have local servers and specific agreements with ISPs for higher bandwidth for them in many countries.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s also quite expensive. YouTube only broke even for over a decade after Google got their hands on it, and Google can afford to host the servers, and manage distribution themselves.

        A new player would find it much harder in today’s landscape. When YouTube was made, it had the advantage that of not having that many viable competitors. That’s no longer the case today.

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 day ago

    Doesn’t seem like she is doing this but watching a coding tutorial with a topless girl presenting it would be much more fun. I wonder if there is a market for this

    • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hope not, that would be a crushing blow! Since I generally boycott YT, I checked out Zara Dar’s What is a Neural Network. It’s a good overview, and well presented. Ah, a look there’s a part 2. It would be great if she could hit 1M views on ProhNub, as a result of this post. Only 207K over the past year, with 2K updoots.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      A $1 CPM (per thousand impressions) is actually pretty good for a platform like Pornhub where I assume most people are logged out/incognito etc. on an adult content.

      If YouTube is really only paying out $0.34 CPM to that creator, that is atrocious. They must be getting like 20% rev share.

      • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        you’re gonna have to verify on ph though

        if only someone makes a great youtube alternative that pays $1-5 cpm, but DOESN’T shut down like blip or vidme. seriously!

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      22 hours ago

      That has been true for a while. Ever since “the adpocalypse”. I’m surprised you missed it because it felt like every YouTube creator was complaining about it for an entire year ( which I’m not really against, I just don’t give a shit about YouTube inside baseball).

      That’s why every video now has " brought to you by… Whatever" in the middle of it.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        YouTube creator was complaining

        Yeah I don’t invest much time into addressing youtuber complaints. But I’ll take what you said at face value.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          21 hours ago

          They’re working class in the entertainment industry, their complaints are as valid as any other laborer.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I thought being a creator on youtube was about tricking people into doing massive amounts of video editing for very little pay.

            • jim_v@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Absolutely true. There isn’t a single content creator that knows how to edit their videos. This demanding task can only be done by people who don’t create content. For every successful content creator, there are three broke editors adding JL cuts in iMovie.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            It’s also a machine that thrives on manufacturing drama for clicks. And I just won’t engage in the ‘meta drama’ around any community.

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Working conditions and payment disputes are not “meta drama” and more than a “community” it’s an industry of freelancers. You may not care for it but independent entertainment is a huge part of our culture right now, in terms of hours watched per day and revenue generation. It’s a parallel arm of the gig economy, uncontracted workers entirely at the mercy of huge media companies and the fickle public.