For awhile it was single downvotes, but it seems that moved up to 2-3 on each comment. Even the most benign stuff gets hit, the pattern is clear.

Can I find this person and block them from seeing my posts? Never really delved into how lemmy works.

Probably doesn’t matter much because after awhile the forget and leave me alone for a bit.

      • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        For anyone else wondering:

        Divisions by zero lemmy.dbzer0.com

        Be Weird, Download a Car, Generate Art, Screw Copyrights, Do Maths

        Communities about Anarchism, Generative Al, Copylefts, Neurodivergence, Filesharing, and Free Software. (And Math!) Follow the Anarchist Code of Conduct and honor the Disengage Rule. Don’t be shitty to each other. Keep it SFW. Obey the spirit of The Golden Rules. Fuck around and find out.

        • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah… there are a couple of toxic peeps I found from DB0, but I think it might work regardless. I could take a look and see.

          Edit: Taking a look at the sight, it’s really good looking. Too bad their CoC is a thing, as that’s going to cause a lot of problems. Any CoC is bad for a community, and is how you do ethical source software, which I’m wholly against.

            • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Basically, a CoC can be the opposite of what it intended to be, as it can be weaponized by people who want to start problems in a community. They can be vague, punishment can be selective, and they can be confusing messes. I tried to find something on how CoC’s are destructive in this manner, but I don’t recall what it was.

              • Unrefined@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                What specifically about the CoC will cause issues? Can you provide examples or specific concerns? Your comments aren’t making a lot of sense in the context of OP.

                • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I was essentially commenting on a separate comment, not OP’s post in particular.

                  As for concerns about the CoC, people can read the CoC and learn how to bend the rules so as to get people in trouble. That was my huge red flag if there was a CoC.

    • shalafi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Neat! Don’t think I have the energy to do much about it, but that’s a great site, thank you very much!

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Looks like a normal short term lemmy fight, someone didn’t like what they said in a thread and opened their history and downvoted everything on the first screen. Going back 3 days and the downvotes stop.

      lemmy.world appears to be their main account, this seems to be the post that triggered them do do their downvoting spree: https://lemmy.world/post/41260627

      Looks like the sock puppet master was angry for about 20 minutes, and got tired of manually downvoting. Still pretty terrible vote manipulation making lemmy a hostile place.

      @shalafi@lemmy.world

          • CoyoteFacts@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s 2 years old, as opposed to the sock puppet ones which are 4 months old. It’s voting the same way as the other 3 also. I guess it doesn’t really matter which is the main, just thought I’d add it regardless since it wasn’t mentioned.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ve looked at the voting patterns and I can’t establish the link you mentioned, the falsewhite accounts are obviously alts/sockpuppets of each other, that is all I can say

              43 downvotes across 2 minutes but at a 4 hours earlier then the other downvoting falsewhite accounts.

              • CoyoteFacts@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                All targeting the same person as the other 3 accounts, 4 hours apart? That’s quite a coincidence if it’s not the same person. My guess is they first went through with their main account, then decided to do the same later with their other accounts. Either way, it’s the exact same behavior as the others, so it’s worth calling out in the exact same way.

      • Username@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think on the original offending post, OP made some somewhat inflammatory comments about ADHD and Autism further down. I imagine the downvoter felt personally hurt by these comments, hence the temporary spree, driven mostly by emotion. I don’t agree with the vote manipulation but not knowing their full story I would caution against people coming across this and retaliating against this person. It seems like it was just a short response and hopefully they have had a chance to cool off now.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think OP is right to be concerned, because while we don’t have karma like reddit (thank god), supposing someome was browsing old posts in a comm[unity] they might utilise the “Top of all time” filter or even the “most controversial of all time” filter - if our OP here makes a particularly useful post, e.g about a tech support issue - then I’m pretty sure having extra downvotes will actually reduce the reach and visibility of the post, using these filters.

      Also in this case it was just useful because it exposes someone acting in bad faith on the fed.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Up/down voting should just be removed. It does nothing, means nothing and only causes people to bitch. It’s annoying.

        I question the sanity of anyone who gives even half a fuck about fake internet points.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It does nothing

          It helps sort content for visibility. Unless you browse Lemmy ONLY by new, you’re benefiting from the voting system. That includes posts AND comments

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve had posts with hundreds of upvotes and one or two downvotes. It’s interesting to contact the downvoters via PM. Not in an accusatory tone but with curiosity.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can discover who is doing it with Lemvotes

    But no, you can’t block them. Here in the real world (as opposed to the dystopian centralized platforms that have largely supplanted public discourse), it is not possible to isolate a specific individual and deny them access to information provided freely to the rest of the general public.

    Should their public engagement rise to the level of harassment, there are legal options you can take to compel their restraint. But downvoting everything you do does not rise to such a level.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        OP is asking how to prevent abusers from seeing OPs content.

        “Blocking” the abuser prevents OP from seeing the abuser’s content. “Blocking” does not prevent the abuser from seeing and interacting with OP’s content.

        “Blocking” does not achieve OP’s objective.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Blocking a user only stops you from seeing them, not the other way around. They can still interact with your posts.

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I highly recommend going into settings and hiding downvotes from yourself. Stick to dealing with the people who at least bother to engage in written form.

    Downvoting is lazy and adds zero value. It’s pure masochism to let yourself get even a tiny bit annoyed just because some rando on the other side of the world spent 0.5 seconds clicking a down arrow on your comment - which they probably didn’t even read to the end.

  • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m going to say - get over it.

    This is not Reddit, where downvoting would actually prevent you from posting.

    This is the Fediverse, where, you can keep going. Who gives a fuck?

    The whinier you are about being downvoted, the more I think you deserve it. Just like anyone who I’ve come across who has amassed a lot of upvotes, turned out to be the biggest assholes I’ve come across.

    • Aeao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had a Reddit account get to the special place for people who got over 100,000 upvotes. The sub was full of assholes.

      Also I’m an asshole so you’re theory checks out.

      • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I remembered being randomly gilded and you got to go into that special subreddit for gilded users. Same deal.

        • Aeao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah I never had to pay for Reddit because I got gold for my comments.

          Which were normally something sarcastic.

          It’s kinda like the algorithm for social media. What gets engagement? Bad shit.

          So if you get a group together who is good at that… you’re kinda surrounded by broken people lol

    • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The whinier you are about being downvoted, the more I think you deserve it.

      I would argue that his massive history and modlogs of him being a shitty person with inflammatory comments and toxic takes are why he deserves it. It should be obvious that after two years of mod corrective actions for egregious behavior he’s not going to change.

      Him doing the “oh, woe is me” act here feels pretty hollow.

  • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    To prove you wrong I down voted this post and I don’t remember any interactions with you in the past.

  • sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Exellent resource! I look forward to terminating and easing the destruction of some of my own hanger-onners in due time