• IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Age verification is one thing, but I routinely verify my id online. Banking, insurance, taxes, various other government things, car registrations, some of the kids school stuff and so on. We have pretty decent infrastructure in place here in Finland and the entities I identify myself online already has my info anyways. I can use either my banking app or mobile verification to securely prove I am who I claim to be and the systems have roughly the same user experience than MFA tokens.

    Each of those are roughly zero-knowledge, the website I log in receives just “User with login token xxx is IsoKiero with SSN 123456789” and the tokens expire after a while. Also there’s restrictions in place that my insurance company can’t just sell my data to whomever unless I opt-in for their “marketing” program (not going to happen) and even then there’s some limitations on how they can use the data.

    The same system could be adopted to age verification, but that’s a whole another can of worms.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      My bank once sent me a letter to my address, to tell me that they did not know what my address was. So I’m not completely sure they are exactly on the ball.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fidelity, Banks, Coinbase (before I got out of cryptocurrency entirely).

    But, basically, only when government regulation does (or SHOULD) impose KYC requirements.

    Age and ID verification might be good in a very few cases, but it should definitely be a deviation from the norm.

  • super_user_do@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Same for me my man. I hate the fact that anonymity on the internet will eventually fall before the end of this decade. The west is not that far away from the authoritarian regimes it claims to be fighting against

  • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    YouTube’s can be broken and that’s the only one I cared about. I guess steam would be an issue if they tried it.

    Pretty sure anything else I can easily just bail on.

  • Arkthos@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I ordered some alcohol online because I couldn’t find the brand of rum I was looking for locally. They did some age verification before I could order, same that I could have encountered in a grocery store.

    Of course they just got sent a token and not a photo id which changes the calculus some. I’m against trusting random websites with personal information, not an age block on its own.

  • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    IMO steam does a reasonable job of age verification - if you’ve registered a credit card, you’re obviously old enough to have one.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A few years ago the IRS website wanted me to take a “video selfie” using a webcam to log in to access my tax stuff. I said Fuck That and ended the session. Finished my taxes through a 3rd party vendor instead.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is no way the states is a real place. That’s beyond crooked and clearly trying to push people into using a 3rd party product.

    • londos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      IRS should already know what I owe and not worry about who logs on to pay it.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh yeah, the states is like that right… I meant for filing and claming tax benefits.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Age verification wouldn’t be a problem if there was a service I trusted that could verify my age, generate an anonymous one way hash or public/private key pair that could verify my age, and then dispose of all information that would could tie me to that info, I’d be ok with it. The problem is there isn’t a group that I’d trust (well that would be willing to do it) and everyone wants to hoard information and create a central repository that will be broken into. It’s not that there is a possibility it could be, but a certainty that it would be. This isn’t really an unsolvable technical problem, but an unsolvable trust problem.

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The EU actually was working on a system described above based on some sort of zero knowledge proof (so verification via your gov’t id, but without the verifying party being able to assert anything other than age > 18 or whatever data you want to verify)

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think that’s the idea of zero-knowledge proofs. Nobody ever knows anything about the other party. Monero uses them (among other things) to be truly anonymous.

  • SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Personally I’ve found online banking, medical and travel services rather hard to resist.

    Those new mobile phone things the kids are using also have biometrics and internets and look pretty handy to have around.

  • deadymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you’ve put your real identity on your passport on some platforms and you’re going to use those platforms for purposes other than work, get ready to be a good and loyal dog.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are we really “protecting” the children? Or is there a huge amount of powerful and wealthy individuals searching for an easy way to get to the children. With the global Trump Epstein Files scandal currently happening, how do we know they are not just stalking more kids? Not a conspiracy theory, just a different point of view. So many horrid groups in the world claim to be protecting children, but they always have a hidden nefarious agenda.

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is just more child abuse disguised as “parental rights”. It becomes clear how harmful this is when you realise that not all parents have their childrens best interests at heart (even if they think they do and sincerely mean well) and allowing parents to censor the information children have available to them allows them to censor information that the children learn only too late to prevent harm.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The issue is that any software is a blackbox when running.

    There is no way for a user to know what code is running let alone verifying that a specific code is actually running on a device, combine that with a sector that keeps wanting more data.