• SatyrSack@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s the eyes that really look off to me. Unrelated to the fact that your post is an entirely different doll than the original meme, the irises/whites in yours seem like a “confused” AI not being able to settle on something cohesive. I’m not sure how to describe it, but its different than just a poorly-made doll

        EDIT: This slightly higher quality version of the same image is able to shed more light on some of the telltale signs of being AI-generated: https://i.imgur.com/yHYDauj.jpeg

        • ummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Curious. That image looks like the result of an attempted AI upscale of the base image. The hairline is mottled, eyebrows darker/sharper, lips have more definition, and the blotchy eyes.

          Verification aside, it was not my intention to make use of an AI image for a meme as I did not see it as such. Whether that means my perception is dulled to where I can be fooled now or that we’re still overestimating the capability of the tech, is up for debate. I’d prefer the latter.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That’s a different barbie than in OP.

        Last week, some jagoff used ai to “redo” a webcomic into the same webcomic, but worse, and with cats. Didn’t even bother tracing. This is possibly an edit or an AI swap / recreation.

        • ummthatguy@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is definitely AI slop:

          The other image appears to be a manufactured doll that was the basis for the modified versions. Or maybe it’s just been jpeg-ed enough to look more realistic.