The measure at issue is known as the “outbound investment” provision. We have heard for years about the problem of manufacturing businesses shipping jobs overseas to China, with its low worker wages and low environmental standards. China typically forces businesses wanting to locate factories in its country to transfer their technology and intellectual property to Chinese firms, which can then use that to undercut competitors in global markets, with state support.
This paragraph is dripping with liberal hypocrisy on so many levels.
This paragraph is dripping with liberal hypocrisy on so many levels.
You sir, have added absolutely nothing to the conversation. This post is a waste of space.
I bet I can waste more space in better faith and somehow be both more informative while contributing even less to the conversation!
P
O
O
P
Woah, how did you know what I was doing
Wait, wait. The only comment in here, directly quoting the article and disagreeing with it?
That motherfuckin defines “adding to the conversation”
Instead of snark how bout ya be embarrassed for christmas’ sake? Just this one time.
Muahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!
Can you explain what you mean? Is the US known for using this tactic? I guess having backdoors in tech comes to mind.
1: Continued reliance on Chinese manufacturing
2: Poor wages are something liberalism absolutely gags for. Unions fought against it and liberals betray them every chance they get.
3: Undercutting markets with your tech lead built on equal parts intellectual theft and brain drain is literally the American system.
Those are the angles I read anyways.