• nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well yeah but we’re not born rich to the ruling class. Our fathers and grandfathers weren’t Senators like Mattys were.

        Rules for thee, not for me.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hahaha you expect politicians to hold themselves accountable!? That would take things like integrity and honesty. You know honor, that thing the we just voted to kill forever.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    And Congress knew and knows about others yet they think that they should still be the ones leading our representative government.

    Why are these people living on the people ?

    • Worthess@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think it’s a perfect time to realize that there are perverts on both sides of the aisle, and neither aisle cares about their constituents.

  • roofTophopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    How could he possibly not? How could people look at him and think he wouldn’t? The dude FUCKING looks like some sort of evil villain. That or a Dollar Tree Beavis.

    I knew about this years ago. You knew about it. Our neighbors knew about. But still we gotta go through this wishy washy bullshit from those who are supposed to be leaders saying that this is all suddenly “coming to light”. Fuck no it isn’t.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Seriously, it wasn’t even as lite as the titile makes it out to be.

      “Gaetz did drugs while paying a child who hadnt even made it to her final year of high school while serving as a GOP representative and the GOP covered for him” would be more accurate

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        “Matt Gaetz does Republican shit.” would’ve been accurate.

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fixed: Matt Gaetz, former Trump AG pick, had sex with raped an underage girl while in Congress, House Ethics report says

    A minor cannot consent.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      In Florida a 17 year old can consent.

      Matt Gaetz being older than 24 is the illegal part. He groomed a young girl.

      Also, because he paid her, then the offense involves the procurement of a person who is under 18 years of age, so the charge increases to a second degree felony, which can result in up to 15 years of imprisonment, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        No she couldn’t consent to anyone over 24, which he was. Also, I would have to play catch-up, but if this is one of the girls he flew to New Jersey to have sex with… It’s sex trafficking a minor right?

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think consent is the wrong word here. A 17 year old can consent to a subgroup of people (under 24). Therfore she is above the age of consent.

          The girl has full control over her decisions but, more importantly, should not be charged with any crime.

          Gaetz on the other hand …

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Consent is tied to legality. You can consent to a credit card at 18 but not 17.

            I can tell someone it’s fine to punch me in the face, and you could call that consent. When the person next door sees it out the window and calls the police, they show up and will arrest them. Both parties say they approved of it and no one wants to press charges. Tough shit, if they follow the law they arrest the person, charges for assault are placed against the person who punched by the State it happened in.

            The “victim” who thinks they consented can tell the state prosecutor they don’t want there to be charges when they get a subpeno to show in court.

            So did I ever actually give consent? No… I never had legal right to at any age.

            (There are some loop holes in a few states, and ways to get out of it, but you get the point)

            Note: This is a another huge example of how laws are broken and ignored by companies and people with money as well. An NFL contract may list that consent was placed to be hit during a tackle, but when a play is over and someone intentionally kicks someone in the ribs, slams someone’s head down into the ground again or hits a player the league “fines them or suspends them” but they are criminal charges so they should be out in front of a judge. Why would they be exempt from the law.

            Fun example: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CgjAN_wgmiI

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                You have no idea how assault charges go. The charges are from the State, not a person. It isn’t a civil case. (Also you could be in another country, so maybe it is different in your country)

                Also a civil suit can be filed separately for restitution by the person. So you could have criminal and civil suits side by side

                Note: most domestic violence charges in the U.S. the partner does NOT want charges to be placed.

                • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  “the charges come form the state” So there are charges. That’s what I said. Are you slow???

              • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                That’s not how criminal law works, actually. In criminal courts the State brings charges regardless of the victims wishes.

                Is there a c/confidentlyincorrect ?

    • Korne127@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t know about this case, I can definitely imagine him raping that girl.

      But from a European perspective, saying minors cannot consent is definitely one of these very stupid US takes. It is honestly insane that in the US 18 is treated like a god, and if one partner is some months older, it’s illegal.
      Obviously, minors can generally be influenced more easily than older people, and it’s important to have safeguards in place, but such a statement is just genuinely ridiculous.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s not the case in this scenario, and rarely is. It varies by state, but Romeo and Juliet laws are common, which cover these kinds of circumstances.

        Basically, the law will set an acceptable age gap where consent can happen; If the gap is 5 years, then a 17 year old won’t be able to consent to sex with a 30 year old, but can with an 18-22 year old. So it helps maintain the “this is obviously a child who was groomed by a creepy middle-aged person” statutory rape laws, while still allowing kids to date each other.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          In some states they just straight up do the European thing where all that matters is being at least 16. In my state the age of consent is 16 and that’s also the age where you can be tried as an adult. They recently voted on whether or not to raise the age, and they decided no.

          There is still push for that to be changed, though only for the age of being tried as an adult. The former they’re kinda keen on keeping where it is.

      • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is honestly insane that in the US 18 is treated like a god, and if one partner is some months older, it’s illegal.

        You’ll be relieved to know that this is never the case.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Let me tell you about Wisconsin: We regularly bump 17-year-old offenders into adult court. So, yes, we have had cases of 17-year-old couples tried as adults for having sex with a minor after they had sex with each other.

          If the implication of that fact hasn’t sunk in I’ll make it explicit: We treat them as adults for the purposes of being a criminal, and a minor for the purposes of being a victim.

          • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ok that one is on me. I don’t know why I expected Romeo and Juliet clauses to have some level of consistency in all states.

  • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    … had sex with an underage girl…

    So, rape? Underage people can’t consent, it’s rape. He’s a pedophile.

    • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup. The report specifically found he violated FL statutory rape law, among other laws, but headlines continue to not call it what it is.

      • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        4 days ago

        America’s willingness to elect pedophiles/rapists to the highest positions in their country is… baffling. To then have their news not even use those words just makes me worry so much for women in the US. Like seriously, ‘sex with underage girl,’ we have specific words for that. Embarrassing.

          • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            As a non-American (Canadian), it’s baffling to me. Our Conservatives have been quite horrific in many decisions (like refusing to admit climate change exists, for example), but I do actually think they would turn on one of their own who was a pedophile. Maybe not in a year or so, but for now, I do believe they would. To see people celebrate these monstrous things in their leaders is terrifying.

        • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Just look at religion for answers to that puzzle. The entire schtick is a manual for giving yourself and your friends easy outs from your constant and consistent bad behaviour

          • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Just look at religion for answers to that puzzle. The entire schtick is a manual for giving yourself and your friends easy outs from your constant and consistent bad behaviour

            I guess that could be why; up here in Canada it’s political suicide to be openly religious (though I think the Cons will change their tune on that next election.)

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          It is baffling, especially since this is the same country where people have been arrested for CP because they had photos of themselves.

          It’s the double standards in these laws that get me.

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Paragon of conservative virtues and former leading figure of elected government officials, everyone.

    • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Sorry, you must have missed the meeting, we do not do repercussions for anyone worth more than $1 million and a light skin tone. As punishment, we will just give him a high-paying political pundit job on OAN. Thank you for your concerns and please get fucked. Sincerely, United States Judicial System.

      Edit: I can’t spell

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    5 days ago

    I seem to recall this asshat and his best buddy Fred Flintstone MTG going on about “groomers” all the time.

    Looks like we found the actual groomer.

    And as usual, it’s ALWAYS projection with the qons. Always.