• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There’s also an argument that the moon isn’t actually a moon since it doesn’t actually orbit around the Earth. If you look at their respective orbits, the moon and Earth kind of shift places like a spinning helix pattern and the orbit of the moon is more tied to the sun than the Earth.

    I haven’t watched this all the way through, but it looks to largely cover the same material. I don’t know how common this is among moons, but I think it makes Earth’s relationship with its moon that much more special.

  • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yeah I think the impact that created the moon is the main reason why there’s life on this planet. That impact also mixed up the heavier metals and liberated enough phosphorus making the composition of earth’s crust unique. Also the two metal cores fused and made it oversized, prompting the difference between the rotation of the Earth and the core, making the magnetic field that protects our atmosphere possible…

    So yeah, I’m definitely not optimistic about life on different planets…

    • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      But hey, if it happened once, maybe we’ll get to find some remains of another system to which this happened as well. Or maybe, someday, someone else will find ours. Or perhaps gravity is the only force keeping us from drifting off the surface of our rock, preventing us from falling into the darkest void for eternity, with the vain hope that your frozen corpse will someday land in someone else’s yard, like a cosmic frisbee.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        The universe is large enough that similar combinations of events could have happened elsewhere too. But it’s also large enough that those places are most likely further from us than our species will ever travel.

        • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Perhaps too far to ever travel, but if we can detect it to at least be aware of their existence, then that might be enough for us. Just an answer.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Honestly, if we ever got a really credible answer, I’m sure we’d dramatically increase the pace of space travel research, to the point where we might innovate a way to get there. Maybe we do one of the space/time bending options, or maybe we find a way to punch a hole through spacetime or something like that. If there’s a will, we’ll put a ton of resources into exhausting every potential way to do it before giving up. It might even create multi-national unity in a way that we’ve never thought possible.

            So please, if you’re an alien that’s been quietly listening to our broadcasts, please send an answer somehow.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      And I’m sure the strong tidal pull likely had an accelerating effect on the early stages of the emergence of life, since the first steps would have basically had to crash into each other in water without having any other way to move. There are many other ways for that to happen on the “millions of years” time scale, but the amount the moon moves our water has got to have had a notable effect.

      • Scribbd@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Earth is and always has been the giant beaker of chemicals that has one of those magnetic stirrers in it, thanks to the moon.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        One of the current theories of life formation involves thermal vents, which provide energy and motion (and necessary chemicals) without any need for lunar tides.

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, I suppose I could have made a list of the various other ways, like the water cycle, thermal vents, and the effects of surface level winds on water below the surface too. But even given all those methods, anything else that helps move water around faster is gonna have some effect.

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I believe there is but it’s also kind of unnecessary to think about it since regardless of where it is past Mars and Venus it’s unreachable anyway.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    5 days ago

    In the fifth or sixth book of the Foundation series they follow a map to Earth that mentions a planet with huge rings and a planet circled by a giant moon. Throughout the universe, this combination was so unique you could identify the home of humanity among trillions of planets.

    It’s a weird book but I’m glad I read it.

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      And the idea of such a big moon was part of why it was largely thought of as an unfounded myth.

      • Klear@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        And it shows how Asimov had zero conception of how ridiculously huge the galaxy is, though that’s just the storylines being a product of their time, probably.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          Or he was writing a fiction and knew he could play fast and loose with scientific laws.

          Asimov wrote non-fiction books about astronomy; I’m sure he knew as much about it as you do.

          • Klear@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            Nah, I read the whole series recently and for some details that bothered me looked up the how the science on that progressed. I can’t give you exact examples as I don’t remember details, but I do know that there’s a bunch of very mistaken assumptions that the series is built on that he had no way of knowing back when he started and had to keep going forward (remember, the series was written over several decades starting in the fourties) and also a bunch of errors where he could have known better but just messed up.

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Okay. We both agree that you have access to information that some who died in the last century wouldn’t have known.

              • Klear@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                I mean, obviously? That’s not what I was saying at all. I think you misinterpreted my original post in a big way.

  • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 days ago

    Due to tidal effects the moon is slowly getting further away from the earth, so we’re living at just the right time to see such spectacular eclipses

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    There are some schools of thought that say that a large moon like ours should be a part of the Drake Equation, because without which life would have a very hard time even on supposed “garden planets”.

    Another factor that is likely to affect civilizations is an easy source of energy, like oil. We got lucky, in that the evolutionary development in Lignin in plants - and the several million years needed for bacteria to catch up and be able to break it down - are what created those massive deposits of organic matter that became trapped deep in the Earth and modified into oil. Without that oil we are unlikely to have reached several milestones, including transportation, population levels, trade, high technology, and even access to space. And this would start affecting us several hundred years back, with steam engines.

    • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      But maybe that’s what normal civilizations go though before leaving their planet, and the abundant access to oil will cause us to destroy earth before we can leave it 🤔

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I recall one paper that tried to analyze how long it would have taken to go from a pre-coal civilization in the 1800s to spaceflight, all without hydrocarbons from the ground, and they estimated over 8,000 years to develop sufficient biological sources of hydrocarbons that could advance tech enough to just get into orbit. And the planetary population would have never exceeded 2B in the process. Oil, gas, and coal have done a shitton to enable technology. Even something as simple as electricity requires significant hydrocarbons Just in the infrastructure, not to mention the production of electricity itself.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Our moon is only the largest moon to planet ratio in our solar system if you discount Pluto as a planet.

    • lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Fun fact: if Luna was only about 30% heavier than it is currently, the Earth’s barycenter would lie outside of Earth, which would potentially make Earth not count as a planet by the modern IAU definition.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I like to imagine an alien “watcher” with a lifespan measured in billions of years who has been hanging out in our solar system since its formation. It finally decides to contact us humans and tells us that it saw our moon being formed from another planet smashing into Earth billions of years ago. “Yeah, we know - wanna see the movie we created showing it?”

  • SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    I love that one of the characters in Iain Banks’ “Transition” tries to find aliens by spotting airtight -looking vessels (ships, vans,…) during solar eclipses, for this exact reason.

      • SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hell yes it was weird as hell! It was also the most conceptually mind boggling (with all the gender and sexual fluidity on top of everything else). I felt from style of writing and tone it was very personal and intimate, guess thats why I liked it so much.

        The weirdest book to me was feersum endshin (sp?), but I mean, we’re reading Banks “it was the day my Grandmother exploded”, so…

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Feersum Endjinn that took such a long time to read the phonetic bits. Loved it though. Subsequent reads were better.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The Whack theory still has some important exceptions, which is why there’s a Double-Whack theory, which also has exceptions.

    “The moon was created this way” is an opinion.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Hypothesis:

        1. A tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.
        2. Something taken to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation; an assumption.
        3. The antecedent of a conditional statement.

        I’d agree if it was stated as “current thinking holds that” or “one theory is” not just “here’s how it happened”. The latter is an opinion.

  • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    So evangelion was right?

    Jokes aside, the probability of moonlike-moons forming in earthlike-planets should be added to drake’s equation and see what that begets.

    Might explain a lot of the silence, at least for life as we know it

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The drake equation is a bogus probability that really means ultimately nothing. I wouldn’t put stock in anything it says.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 days ago

          The Drake Equation was not really meant to be used. The original purpose of the Drake Equation was to drum up conversations surrounding the first SETI. All it really did was condense everything someone should look for in a possibly human habitable world where aliens may exist. We have much better ways to calculate and search now.

  • ferret@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    But the moon size thing isn’t a coincidence, thats part of what makes solar eclipses so rare, the moon needs to be at the correct distance when it passes in front of the sun or it isn’t as impressive, and it does do that some times.

  • Estra (she/her)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Sometimes I wonder if the moons size / existence is one of the reasons why life is even possible in the first place - Maybe aliens would know what it’s like to have a moon a quarter the diameter of the home planet because otherwise life has no chance, maybe life is even more likely on dual planet systems like Pluto and Cheron, maybe that’s already too similar in size and life has no chance, maybe the median sentient creature in the universe has experienced a tide, or maybe not - anyways I dunno that much about exoplanets or astronomy in general so every thing I’ve said might be completely bonkers xD

  • Mpatch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It sounds more like the moon is just earth spare parts. Like when I put things back together. Always a bin of extras that hang around in the back of the truck, sliding around and what not.