• dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s freedom from government regulations, many of which stem from the last time we let companies set up their own towns. What could possibly go wrong?

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 days ago

        Last time we got full scale shooting wars between workers and companies. If I’m putting on my optimist hat then I’d say at least we’ll get to shoot some rich folk.

        • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 days ago

          I doubt they’ll be on the front lines. It’ll just be the poor shooting at each other. The only real solution is Luigi, until they’re scared enough to negotiate in good faith.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            Oh for sure, but if it gets to the point where I need to fire my gun at somebody it’s definitely not going to be aimed at some low level corporate thug. That is, unless they’re standing between me and their boss.

    • techclothes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes, but it does follow republican naming convention. Right to work states are anything but, for example.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Honestly, the beauty of the game is the sheer irony of it all.

        And I kinda wish those neo-kitsch high fashion Kevlar-lined clothing was real, because some of the Corpo drip in Cyberpunk looks cool as fuck.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      It makes much more sense when you understand the differences between the Northern version of freedom vs. the Southern version of freedom. These asshats think of freedom as the freedom to rule over others.

  • Kane@femboys.biz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    8 days ago

    “ You load 16 tons, what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt St. Peter, don’t you call me 'cause I can’t go I owe my soul to the company store “

  • chetradley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    In September of last year, the podcast Behind the Bastards did a two part series on right wing blogger Curtis Yarvin, his connections to Peter Theil, and his influence on JD Vance. I highly recommend these episodes for anyone who wants to know where this is all headed.

    Yarvin has, for years, pushed the notion of RAGE (retire all government employees), and his dark enlightenment movement centers on dismantling democracy and installing a neo-feudalistic system of government in which oligarchs rule as kings.

    This is not some crazy new proposal that will be ignored by the people in power. This is the endgame. The oligarchs and right wing fascists Trump has surrounded himself with have been pushing this for years, just waiting for their moment.

    If you don’t think this is a big deal, then you probably won’t realize until it’s too late.

  • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is the dumbest branding exercise ever. There are no additional “freedoms” that you can get in a corporate-run city versus a regular city; except that perhaps the corporation has more freedom to trounce upon the rights of the citizenry.

    If the future that Curtis Yarvin and his type envision starts to shape up, we’re gonna need to go full, 100% anti-corporation to push back.

    • except that perhaps the corporation has more freedom to trounce upon the rights of the citizenry.

      That is exactly the kind of freedom they are looking for, and don’t underestimate the psychology there - it feels like freedom to them, the kind of freedom that allows for injustices to prevail. I’m reminded of an anecdote of Ẑiẑek, talking to a bunch of fascists in former Yugoslavia, where they in no uncertain terms revealed, that it had been tyranny to them to not be able to be violent, rape, plunder, etc. and that the chaos of the breakup had been a liberatory event for them, psychologically.

      Never assume “freedom” is something, that opposing classes and groups in general agree upon when it comes to its definition.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      We should really be doing that regardless, the corporation has outlived its utility and has become a chain on the collective neck of humanity

  • Azal@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    You load sixteen tons, what do you get?

    Another day older and deeper in debt

    Saint Peter, don’t you call me 'cause I can’t go

    I owe my soul to the company store

  • imvii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    These zones would allow wealthy investors to write their own laws and set up their own governance structures which would be corporately controlled and wouldn’t involve a traditional bureaucracy.

    Why do I read this as incel rape cities?

  • socphoenix@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 days ago

    According to interviews and presentations viewed by WIRED, the goal of these cities would be to have places where anti-aging clinical trials, nuclear reactor startups, and building construction can proceed without having to get prior approval from agencies like the Food and Drug Administration, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Yes because the first thing I think needs regulations is fucking nuclear power!

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 days ago

      If anyone reads that and goes “hell yea”…

      Also what the fuck is a “nuclear reactor startup”?!? God, tech bros really take a whole bunch of privilege and advantage and just throw it all away to be dumber than anyone could have thought possible.

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s like a regular nuclear reactor, except it’s run by people who don’t know anything about nuclear reactors, the waste is dumped wherever without consequence, and the power output is only used to run an AI and mine cryptos.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Likely still a net improvement over all the fossil fuels they’re burning for that shit now.

      • Celsulus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        The double-meaning of the word “startup” might throw people off, but when the other items from the list in the quote are “trials” and “construction” you can imagine they are talking about an action rather than an entity. Here a “reactor startup” would be the process of a reactor going from subcritical, extremely low power state to the point where it can heat water on its own through fission. This is a standard term in the nuclear power industry, and this confusion seems like one more reason reactors should not exist in an unregulated venture capital environment.

    • chetradley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      The “move fast and break things” mantra of silicon valley is bad enough when you aren’t talking about breaking a goddamn nuclear reactor.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Can we just build an artificial island in the middle of the ocean for these losers? Just drop them there and let them try to figure it out. See how long before they come begging for help.

  • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    I just wish they would be honest with their naming schemes. Stop with the “freedom this” and “freedom that” nonsense. They don’t give a good goddam about freedom and we all know it. They are just trying to build “company towns” with touchscreens. We’ve already been down this road. You can slap all the lipstick you want on it, but it’s still a fucking pig.

  • Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 days ago

    I didn’t think I would live to see Cyberpunk become a reality. Or the return of Company Towns. Either one sounds preposterous.

  • Polderviking@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    This reads like an email or news message you find on random computers in dystopian computer games like Deus Ex or Cyberpunk 2077.

  • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 days ago

    So like a town, owned by a company, like some sort of company town, but now with freedom! The freedom to live in a house owned by your employer, shop at a store owned by your employer, and you have to use special money that your employer pays you in. Yup, nothing says freedom more the having incredibly limited choices.