• Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ll give it a watch, thank you! I’m not saying it’s not problematic and doesn’t amplify the crazy, btw. It most certainly does. The sickness is not creating a society that has time, money, and skill set necessary to well… properly socialize our population, as well as innoculate them against this mess. But in a sane world, most manosphere garbage would be banned as hate speech, probably.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          100%, this video mostly goes into how fascism requires violent men to sustain it, and so violent men it will create through isolation and harmful propaganda. it’s basically positive feedback loop where as fascism gains more ground, it isolates us more, making it easier to make men feel lonely and like they’re failures, and that the system doesn’t work, but instead of trying to make the system work by embracing a new view, they instead move from violence to hyperviolence.

          the video basically both agrees with you, and at the same time makes a compelling argument that all the people killing us right now are sad pathetic losers whose daddies never loved them, and they see no avenue to a better tomorrow so they do… this

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            the video basically both agrees with you, and at the same time makes a compelling argument that all the people killing us right now are sad pathetic losers whose daddies never loved them, and they see no avenue to a better tomorrow so they do… this

            That’s basically why I’ve moved from a “f them , they get what they deserve” to trying to establish dialogue that offers a path to redemption/atonement. If the person demonstrates no good faith and continues to attack, boundaries must be set and enforced. When good faith is demonstrated, we try again. If they revert to abhorrent behavior, we set former and more extensive boundaries. If they are straight up belligerent/dangerous, we segregate and rehabilitate/re-educate humanely, and attempt reintegration. Capitalism is not the system for that. It’s time to try socialism.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I haven’t seen that one, but I love FD.

        Check out Sixteenth Minute of Fame, too. Jamie Loftus did a multi-part series on the Manosphere, and it’s excellent.

        It’s serious but still funny, rich in historical detail but still personal, and she portrays it as patriarchy vs everyone (not men vs women) without turning that into a free pass for men.

        You can tell she put a ton of extra care into these ones.

  • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The problem is that something is missing and it’s being filled by angry reactionaries and right wing grifters who prey on the particular insecurities of young men, specifically insecurities around masculine values.

    What’s missing is a foundational framework for understanding the male experience as distinct yet coequal to feminist theory. A framework that seeks to promote a balanced, respectful dialogue by articulating unique structures, values, and challenges faced by men, in order to offer a lens through which male identity, struggle, and transformation can be understood on their own terms, while upholding - acknowledging - the progress and insights of feminism.

    These men feel like they don’t have purpose or identity. They need a framework, but unfortunately efforts to define and build such a framework are often hijacked by extremists that just hate women and minorities. Like we see now.

    • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      How can right wing extremists hijack a “foundational framework” when you offer nothing. For them to hijack the conversation you would first have to offer substance that then is taken but you don’t offer anything. That is why they vote against you. You are for the betterment of one sex and that doesn’t include them. Why would they vote with you? If the situation were reversed you wouldn’t vote with them either.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I must live in a bubble. Both of my (university age) kids and their friends are vocally offended by Trump and Musk, and they think Polierve is a bad joke.

    My oldest games online with a few Americans and they are also very anyi-trump. (“They wouldn’t be my friends if they supported him”)

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Shitty parenting and the education system being eroded year by year. This is the generation that the billionaires wanted. Poor, stupid and complicit.

    • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, make them idiots and then tell them they’re the most important idiots and shouldn’t feel less than. It’s a Republican politician’s wet dream to have a population of slobbering assholes who feel like they deserve more than everyone else and are being denied it

  • arankays@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well the kids are leaning right because of propaganda and mind control. Plain and simple. Instagram and Twitter actively push ragebait content designed to radicalise impressionable kids.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Talked to a few of my friend’s kids. They all think Musk is a genius.

    I see Andrew Tate victims in all of them.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    Both JP and PP couldn’t fight their way out of a wet paper bag and they’re waxing poetic about masculinity?

    PP’s so masculine that when one of the racist supporters said he’d rape his wife, this powerhouse just pulled down his pants, bent over and took it.

    Anything these twats says is absolute nonsense.

  • senoculum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gen x parents have dropped the ball so hard it’s not even funny.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Look, the only reason people start getting conservative, is when needs and wants start getting harder to acquire. Want to change that? then have affordable living make a come back. There’s a reason why a decade ago people were more liberal, because shit was more affordable.

      • Alpha71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        How long have the Liberals been in power? And did they do anything about the current cost of living crisis? They’ve had every opportunity to fix this situation but they haven’t. There’s a reason why a Conservative win was predicted before trump went off his meds.

        DO I think Conservatives would do better in power? Hell no, but they were at least saying “hey, we’ll fix this so you can live on your current wages again.”

        The fact that they were American Republican Lite didn’t matter.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I mean they did a fuck of a lot more than Harper!! Do you REMEMBER what life was like under Harper?? PP isn’t a clone of Trump. He’s a protégé of HARPER, a controlling, paranoid little facsimile. All this shit with oppressive narcissistic control of the press is exactly how Harper behaved.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There’s a reason why a Conservative win was predicted before trump went off his meds.

          What

          How long have the Liberals been in power? And did they do anything about the current cost of living crisis?

          Man you are going off

          Yes, people are shit ass at understanding economics. Neither liberalism nor conservatives are great at balancing budget. But conservatives sute as shit are a whole lot worse at it.

          • Alpha71@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes, The Conservatives in polling were looking at a possible majority acording to then current polls. But once trump showed his ass and the Liberals didn’t back down, the Liberals polling numbers went way up. It probably also helped that Justin was forced decided to stand down as the Party leader.

        • WheelerSelanne@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          So because they’re willing to say anything to get elected they’re a better option? What have the conservatives actually done in the last 30 years to help working class Canadians? Are we supposed to suddenly trust them now that they realize they have to have actual policies instead of just ‘hate this one guy’? Are we meant to ignore decades of Polivere’s voting record?

            • WheelerSelanne@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes, but the question is why. Is it based on logic based reasons or due to the misinformation campaign? Because they think the current Conservatives will actually do anything to make substantial changes to address these issues or because idiots like Rogan and Mcleary tell them to hate the other side? Is it because they’re not getting enough or just because someone else is getting something?

              It’s not like anybody is going to start building thousands of $500000+ houses and selling them at cost to the middle class. The only thing the feds would do to address housing would be to build low cost housing again. I can imagine how that would go over with the crowd we’re talking about

      • GuardYaGrill@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Eh became conservative when my liberal government started banning a hobby I recently found relieved stress.

    • WheelerSelanne@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve lived in a small rural prairie riding all my life. It’s been not conservative one term in the last 40-50 years. The people who complain the most about Canada being broken are the ones who have owned their houses since the 90’s and worked the same jobs for pretty much as long and have the health care system all their long lives and starting to collect cpp even while continuing to work, as long as it doesn’t put them too much into the next tax bracket. They can’t really explain how Canada is broken for them, beyond talking points. They can’t really explain what they think Conservatives will do to fix the things they don’t really know are wrong. They just vote conservative because liberal bad. The fuck Carney signs came out the day after he was confirmed as Liberal party leader. There was no time to formulate a hate for him, it was immediately implemented mindlessly

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is correct, but I’d just like to add, it’s because conservatives always provide simple answers, to complex issues because they don’t actually care about fixing anything.

      Housing too expensive? It’s the immigrants!

      Food too expensive? It’s the liberal regulations!

      Taxes too high? We’ll lower them!

      Every issue, they provide a simple, yet absolute bullshit fix for, but it’s easy to understand and for a simple mind, simple solutions are the answer.

      Liberals have failed to make progress on these issues because in part there’s corruption, ineptitude, but for the most part because the solutions required are complex and take a long time to fix. And no-one has the courage to say this shit is fucked and we need a fix that addresses all of the facets of the problem.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I still don’t understand how they are doing it.

    At no point in history could you go to the woman dealership and buy a woman. You could maybe pay for a little time with a woman, or buy a slave at a slave auction. You could negotiate with a woman’s father some exchange for his daughter. But that exchange usually had to have something of value, and it also meant you lived beyond the age of 30.

    Like I get that younger people are dumb, and being a man, I can attest that men are particularly dumb, but how fucking whacked are these men thinking they will somehow benefit from this?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      The strict dress code for women came about because debt collectors would show up to farms in the Fertile Crescent to demand payment on a loan, and decide to take their daughters as payment. (Drunkenly-remembered source: Graeber, “Debt: The First 5,000 Years.”)

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Where are their fucking parents? My generation bitches endlessly about boomers, then…raises another generation of them?

    Nice.

    • nroach44@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Both working and burnt out by the rise in everything costing so much but wages being stagnant?

      • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Does that make it okay to raise monsters?

        If you can’t raise your kids how about don’t have any? This world is pointless and cruel by default anyways.

        Edit: so, downvoters think it’s justified and not a negative character flaw to crank out broken people because…? I guess it’s inconvenient when executing lifescript.exe thoughtlessly with no regard for anyone but your selfish self.

        There’s been no justifications, just excuses.

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          It takes a village to raise a child. The village abandoned them. This is on society as a whole.

        • nroach44@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          A big part of solving a problem is understanding what leads up to it.

          If it were just one family? Fine, ignore it, blame them.

          If it’s a lot of them? Maybe, just maybe there is something going on in the bigger picture.

          • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Good luck, it’s been one for as long as we’ve existed.

            Meantime this doesn’t excuse the majority’s lacking ability to take personal responsibility for their choices made in the here and now.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Social democracy let everyone down (by being neither social or democratic, thanks to politicians thinking about their rich friends) and now people are surprised that a generation started to believe that an authoritarian leader would be better.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Are you kidding? All crown corporations are getting privatized, they’re intentionally destroying social services in order to justify giving more space to the private sector, they only built housing long enough to comfortably house boomers and X and then they gave up…

        No it’s not social democracy at this point, it was still sold as being it way longer than it actually was though and that’s how people became sour to it. If you convince people that social democracy is them not being able to afford to live, they’ll get hooked to the first alternative they find.

        • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The reason I asked is because I feel that you are blaming social democracy and I think you are painting with too broad a brush. Capital should serve the state, the people, not the other way around. Social democracy is in part about strong regulations on capital. We need to stand by that and support it. Throwing it away cedes power to capital.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I’m not blaming social democracy, I’m describing how people feel because they’ve kept being told that’s what they were getting even when they weren’t until they started to believe that social democracy was the problem to begin with.

            We won’t get social democracy with the choices offered to us either so what then?

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I vote for counter propaganda feeding them that right leaning people are all child predators or will become one. Make them demonized the same way they demonize the left.

  • PandaParent@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t buy into this whole narrative. There’s a 2023 study that shows very little change in men’s political views over the past four generations. It’s women, especially white women, who have swung hard to the left, and Gen Z women are twice as likely to call themselves “liberal” as Boomer women. Young women cited the following reasons:

    “The #MeToo movement was a defining cultural moment for many young women, informing their views about the treatment of women in society. Donald Trump’s election in 2016 was another formative event for many young women, who remained uniquely opposed to him throughout his presidency. Finally, the overturn of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruling that established a right to abortion, was a uniquely salient issue for young women, who identified it as their most crucial concern in the months following.”

    The caveat is that this is an American study. But if we extrapolate to Canada, it’s women who are driving the gender gap between the LPC and CPC. Men are just as conservative as they’ve always been. The only difference between now and 1965 is that they’re all shouting about it on social media, whereas back then, they just bitched about it in bars.