• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just a reminder that the same people who are against free school lunches for children are the ones who stand in front of abortion clinics screaming about how abortion is murder.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s no contradiction for these people. All fetuses have a right to life and children should suffer if they don’t have enough money. Shoulda worked harder at the bootstraps factory if they didn’t want to eat shit their entire lives.

      They max out at a 4 on Kohlberg’s morality scale, ie the laws are immutable and nothing can change them. The law says that everyone should live and our system is perfect because it’s our system.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg’s_stages_of_moral_development

      • bigb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Sprinkle some smug self-satisifaction on top of this and it’s a real good portrait of the Christian right. Religion is a narotic for these folks who spend their days judging others. They believe in the correct God™ and His prosperity gospel. Anyone who is poor or those who “sin” deserve their lot in life. And how are kids to learn self-reliance when they’re coddled with free food? We’re so weak to let our kids live in such decadent times! What’s next, they won’t have to pay for healthcare after they made the bad decision to get hurt or sick?

        They ask how we can be so wasteful as a society while they clutch their imitation pearl necklace. Meanwhile the public’s share of wealth shrinks and everyone is left to fight for the scraps. When the situation is so dire, it’s easy to fight with each other than to question big business, Wall Street or the financial sector.

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I highly doubt that image represents the food US kids get in school. It’s too healthy and good looking (not saying it looks good, just better than it actually would be).

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    This sounds like a great way to generate a different headline,

    “Local man kills 4 in attack of school board meeting after losing his children over school lunch debt”

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m from this region of Pennsylvania. Abuse and bullying is protected by the culture of this region. The sheriff’s office has done mass murders against strikers in the coal fields. 1860’s I believe. This guy stepped down. But his sentiment carries far in the community. It’s a bigoted hate filled hole.

    A literal gun cult is financing far right radicals into local politics. A hate group is trying to force schools to out children who say they are gay. And YouTube protects their account where they post hours of hate content.

    I worked with the president of the group before. He was fired from his job because he was accused of stealing $15,000.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    6 months ago

    Starve your kid or lose them. That’s quite a choice for a poor parent to make.

    My late father grew up in an orphanage because my grandfather was too poor to care for 5 kids and a sick wife. My grandparents were able to take the kids home on Sundays though, so it wasn’t a situation where they yielded full custody. I’m not saying an orphanage was ideal, but it’s a shame that these days there is not the same kind of middle ground where kids can be cared for but still stay connected to their family. I guess that is too much of a social safety net for conservatives to tolerate.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    6 months ago

    Kids go to public school during lunchtime. Public school feeds the children lunch (something with real nutritional value that we would all want our kids eating). Kids do not pay for this. That’s it. There should be no further discussion here. If you disagree with this I want to put my thumb into your eye socket in the worst way. It’s so fucked up this is even a topic of discussion.

    • CPMSP@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      How dare you invest in the future? Our potential future tax base needs to learn how to starve or go into debt - those are the most important lessons in the good old US of fucking A.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re the future of our country and society, and legally required to be there, but we won’t feed them.

      'cause 'merica you fucking commie.

      • mcv@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        There are other countries where kids bring their own lunch. We always make sandwiches and a snack for our kids to bring to school.

        I do think school-provided lunches are a great idea and if done right, would guarantee every kid equal access to healthy nutrition. Unfortunately we don’t have that in NL, and clearly the powers that be don’t want it in the US either.

        But punishing kids for lunch debt is nuts. That’s absolutely a symptom of the US wanting everybody to live in debt.

        • Inucune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wasn’t it last year schools were throwing kid’s bagged lunches away? So then they force the kids to eat a school lunch or starve, then blame the parents. This is just the next illogical step of the grift.

          • mcv@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Throwing kids’ lunch away should be illegal. What if s kid has special dietary requirements? But if a school does throw it away, they have an obligation to provide a free lunch that’s at least as good.

            • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              It should be illegal to throw someone else’s property away without their permission, right? I mean, it’s basically theft.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree with that kids should be fed, but what’s wrong with homemade sandwiches? That’s what is the norm in NL and if kids don’t have them theaters notice it and will work on fixing it while given them food.

      The shit we had at most schools I went to was well kinda unhealthy crap.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nothing wrong. Bring it and eat it. But if you’re kid and you don’t, school should feed you. In the US kids are legally required to attend school. Forcing someone to be somewhere and not providing sustenance is not allowed in war or prison, damn well should not be allowed in schools.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Trump’s new spending bill is providing $3.6 trillion tax cut for the richest among us. They already pay only 8% on average, but they own the politicians and are demanding to pay even less.

      How are we supposed to pay for that if we don’t rob children of their school lunches?!

      • Spookyghost@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Spending less money bombing children in other places would give us more than enough funds, but that helps funnel money to the aforementioned richest among us, so that’s not going to happen.

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yep that’s right, $8 billion in the new bill for Israel to continue massacring children and stealing their ancestral land.

          Israel First policy is an American notion I’ll never understand. Israel is the biggest terrorist nation-state in the world right now, nobody commits war crimes and other high crimes against humanity at the rate Israel does. It’s so sad to see them dog walking American leaders every day but here we are.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    Eh, not just America sadly. Half the world seems brainwashed into thinking that feeding children is controversial. The BBC did an article the other day about 500,000 extra kids getting them, and it got 9000 comments, split equally between “fair enough” and “but what about my tax money? 😢”

    They should give the Libertarian nutcases a large enclave, and all the people who moan about their taxes being spent on other people should be forced to go and live there.

    Oh, there’s a pothole on your road? Hope one of the residents can afford to have it fixed. You were burgled? Can you afford to pay the police company to look into it? No streetlights, sorry. That’s a waste. You carry a torch and light your own way. Pensions? Didn’t you save enough?

    Stop worrying about the tax bills of billionaires, for fucks sake. They can get by with less.