Local shopping street in the city of Montréal, It’s the beginning of the summer here, and more and more streets are being closed to cars every summer (although they’re reopened during the cold Canadian winters), the difference in the amount of people there now vs last week when it was still open to cars is absurd.

Even more people! Lil stand

Since It’s the beginning of the summer there was a marching band to celebrate, which was nice.

Businesses set up stands where they sold stuff, offered free samples and stuff like that, and there was also seating and games set out for kids, like a bouncy castle, some (mini) mini-golf courses and a mini skate park.

Just closing the street to cars made the space much nicer, and there were way more people there than when the street was open to cars.

  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is simple urbanism. Cars don’t stop in to see what a new business has to offer, pedestrians do. Pedestrians don’t need parking. Good urbanism makes local business boom. They are terrified of it.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Speaking as a car owner 15 minutes from a big downtown…

    Car friendly downtown is impossible, and this is much better. Have some big park and ride areas well outside of downtown and bus people into the area, with some slow scooters if people really didn’t want to walk that much.

    They closed one of the big downtown roads to vehicles and it’s so much nicer.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    In addition to creating more pedestrian only zones, I like our “Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich (Living Zone?)” too.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    In my city we finally decided to install a tram line over a long avenue. Do you know that “classic” 4 lanes avenue where one lane on each side is practically reserved for assholes to “temporarily park” with hazard lights blinking?

    So it becomes from 4 2 lanes to 2 lanes + tram. Win, right? I read an article about a sports goods store where the owner says “we decided to close shop now (when the tram construction isn’t even started) because next year without the space for customers to park (there isn’t now) how we could we continue business?”

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t understand the logic behind this. Are they expecting folks to shop whilst still in their cars?

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      The argument is that people won’t go to the street if they can’t park, this is a stupid argument, especially in Montreal

      • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But street parking is a stupid idea to begin with. Most of the time I can’t find a spot and on the rare occasions I do, I end up having to parallel park.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I don’t understand this attitude. My town is having the same arguments. We have a central street filled with shops and restaurants that everyone wants to pedestrianize. It worked great for pandemic, and in smaller doses since. It brings huge amounts of foot traffic, tons more business, and gives people a place they want to go.

      The argument against seems especially silly - there’s tons of public parking running behind the shops so it’s not like anyone wouldn’t go there

      My optician is one of those opposed. They apparently think those couple street parking spots in front of their building are critical to their business. I’ve always founded it more convenient to use the public parking lot immediately behind them, no big loss. If the place is welcoming to pedestrians, I’m more likely to also walk up the street for an ice cream, or stop at one of the restaurants for dinner. If they think they get impulse shopping, they should want those hundreds of extra pedestrians when the street is closed

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    In the bumfuck town I live in, they are barring the streets in the old town every weekend because it increases foot traffic and local stores were dying off. It’s still pretty run down and in bad shape, but better than before.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think I told this one here at some point, but in my town we had a particular storeowner who aggressively opposed making a street pedestrian-only. I’m talking camping in town hall as a protest. Threatening a hunger strike. This lady was on a mission. Her storefront was plastered with propaganda about how this was going to kill the town.

    She was an absolute nuisance and her karmic punishment for this? She has prime commercial real estate on the most popular street in town while stores in streets open for traffic had to relocate or close because all the business happens in the car-free area.

    • Lenny@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      damn, I as really hoping the story ended with everyone boycotting her store as she watched her business neighbors thrive before she eventually goes out of business.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nope. Rising tides floating all boats include the really annoying boats, as it turns out.

        Still, she was so spectacularly wrong I do still imagine how she processed that and whether the contradiction ever stuck. She really made a whole personality out of this for years.

  • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    Man, my first visit to Montreal was for heavy Montreal 2019 (BRING THAT BACK DAMNIT), and I loved walking down the pedestrian only streets near where we were staying.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      For sure! I hope they close it year-round so they can put more permanent things like water fountains and trees on the road.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    7 months ago

    Any small, local business owner that believes foot traffic will hurt their business should just close up shop already. Because they are idiots.

    Not only is it better for the health of the community not to have cars there, but it strengthens the community by allowing people to interact with each other like human beings, and not caged animals.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think Jane Jacobs figured this out in 1961.

    There’s always foot traffic by me and I wouldn’t want it otherwise.

    Now if we could get rid of on street parking and put in separated bike lanes…

  • bieren@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    But this street isn’t closed all year is it? I mean, this is part of an art festival. I am all for closing streets and building walkable/bikable communities. But don’t pick and choose based off a single event that draws a crowd regardless of it takes place on a street or in a park.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s closed for three months, and when I went again yesterday it was just as busy. Where’d you get that it was part of an art festival?