This screenshot is old (at least 12 years).

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because trashy people never saw Austin Powers and updated their use of quotation marks to denote sarcasm.

      Quotation marks were historically used to add emphasis to text, the way asterisks are used today. Old people who refuse to change and don’t realize their way of writing is actively making fun of themselves still use them this way. These are also the people who watch Fox.

      • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Scare quotes” definitely precede Austin Powers, though that may have spurred a rise in popularity of the usage. (Also, “trashy people never saw Austin Powers” is honestly a pretty weird statement, IMO.)

        That said, in this case, arguably the quotes are appropriate, because “the github dictionary” isn’t something that happened (i.e. a headline), but a thing they’ve made up.

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Scare quotes are used informally, but it’s not proper usage like a “news” channel should be doing. Which, fair enough, it’s Fox “News.” But it’s already larger text and all caps - why is more emphasis necessary?

      • sfbing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Quotation marks we’re historically used …

        Meh. I am in my late sixties, and that was never proper usage. These people were merely always illiterate.

        • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s valid usage if you go waaay back, i.e. centuries. You also see it in some late 19th/early 20th century newsprint and ads.

          • BatmanAoD@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, because the thing they are naming is “The Github Dictionary”; they’re not applying scare-quotes to the word “dictionary” implying that what they’ve written is not really a “dictionary”.

  • dave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m almost more irritated by the use of two hyphens instead of a colon after the first definition. They just didn’t give a shit really.

  • jimmux@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m surprised they didn’t sneak in a swipe about open source being a socialist conspiracy to undermine American ingenuity.

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    At least chat gpt would have spelled it right for fucks sake.

    Did they let a 6 year old write that up?

    THEY GET PAID TO DO THIS. SOMEONE GETS PAID TO CHECK IT TOO.

    Or am I being trolled.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You know how scam emails intentionally include mistakes because they want to filter out smart people? Same idea.

      Reasonably smart people will see this and go “this is garbage”. The idiots will go deeper, and become loyal gop voters.

    • beegnyoshi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Description says the screenshot is at least 12 years old, though asking google at the time would have probably at least yielded the correct spelling of repository, so I wouldn’t go as far as to dismiss your conclusion

    • Phunter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 months ago

      Either that or they’re doing the same amount of research they normally do. It’s hard to tell.

  • monkeyman512@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Part of me is bothered by those explanations, but if I had to explain GitHub to a tech illiterate grandparent with that much screen space I don’t know if I would do much better.

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why even bother explaining those terms if you only have that much screen space.

      • bonn2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t seen the news release, but I would hope they are explaining those terms because they are going to have someone on to talk about github and they were planning on using said terms

    • Eranziel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      127
      ·
      2 months ago

      Repository: a collection of computer code for a software program (or app if you insist).

      Fork: a copy of a repository so you can edit it without affecting the original.

      Pull request: a request to the owner of a repo to bring in some changes you made in a fork.

      I think I even got the word count down.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Repository: a collection of related computer code, like related files in a filing cabinet

      Fork: a copy of a repository at a certain point in time, like a fork in the road, they diverge from that point

      Pull request: a request that a repository owner incorporate your changes into their files.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      “CI” - “Come In” which is what your boss says when they ask for a meeting after you thought it was fine for that one line change to skip CI and it broke something

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    What the hell? If they just asked ChatGPT it would have been much better:

    • Repository: A folder of project files on the internet.

    • Fork: Your own copy of that folder to make changes.

    • Pull Request: A way to ask, “Can my changes go back into the original folder?”

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    At least they didn’t call it a suppository.

    “GitHub just reached its 1 billionth suppository!!”