axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoWhich git branch are you on?locklemmy.cafeimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1396arrow-down118
arrow-up1378arrow-down1imageWhich git branch are you on?locklemmy.cafeaxEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squareLembot_0004@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up75arrow-down15·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 months agoTrunk would be better because of all the branches.
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·6 months agoI know someone with a master’s degree from university. Well, he cut me a golden master copy of the track, anyway.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down8·6 months agoWhy master? main is much clearer
minus-squareyarr@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·6 months agoWhy main? m is much clearer
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agowe should make the empty string the name for the default branch
minus-squareLembot_0004@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down7·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·6 months ago everyone understands no, new people learn git every day. ‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
minus-squareDerpgon@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down6·edit-26 months agoWhy not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner. Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves. Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
minus-squareCubitOom@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up47arrow-down2·edit-26 months agoMy scrum master said that we need new tickets to update the git branches and pipelines to use main instead of master since master was a bad word. I asked him what his job title was again and there was a pause. Then he said we can’t say that we are going to groom the code base anymore.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·6 months agoIf we are not grooming the codebase, are we then waxing it? Or is it more eco-friendly to let the codebase grow wild and untrimmed?
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·6 months agoI’m gonna go ahead and assume your scrum main doesn’t groom themselves.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Trunk would be better because of all the branches.
I know someone with a master’s degree from university.
Well, he cut me a golden master copy of the track, anyway.
Why master? main is much clearer
Why main? m is much clearer
we should make the empty string the name for the default branch
deleted by creator
no, new people learn git every day.
‘main’ is much clearer. It’s maybe not the same readability gain as ‘blocklist/allowlist’ over ‘blacklist/whitelist’, but it’s still there.
Why not change “walkie talkie” to “radio phone”? It is so much cleaner.
Because change for the sake of change always brings more work than what it saves.
Why change something that works and everyone recognizes it? Of course, if this debate was there when the standard was created…
My scrum master said that we need new tickets to update the git branches and pipelines to use main instead of master since master was a bad word.
I asked him what his job title was again and there was a pause.
Then he said we can’t say that we are going to groom the code base anymore.
If we are not grooming the codebase, are we then waxing it?
Or is it more eco-friendly to let the codebase grow wild and untrimmed?
I’m gonna go ahead and assume your scrum main doesn’t groom themselves.