They call it “dark traffic” - ads that are not seen by tech-savvy users who have excellent ad blockers.

Not surprised that its growing. The web is unusable without an ad blocker and its only getting worse, and will continue to get worse every month.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Well now, here’s one that comes up under “other”.

    I started using an adblocker because I was using an elderly netbook for my studies. Ads junked up resource usage so much they used to freeze my laptop, and render most sites unusable.

    Thanks to my adblock, I was able to finish my studies.

    These days I use adblock because I object to virus-like code execution on my hardware. I tell others about adblock and get them set up to get free tea/coffee (and to watch their faces as sites become usable again).

    The quiet mention of the 12ft.io being taken down is disturbing, it was a good tool for students to read article sources. This kind of change forces them to rely on AI (Gemini respects paywalks, Copilot just ignores them), which risks misinformation being spread!

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    The web has almost always been unusable without an adblocker. Ads today are less malicious, but more insidious. Clicking the wrong ad in 2003 would brick your computer. Clicking the wrong ad today means you’ll have to cancel a credit card after your personal data is compiled and sold on the black market.

    Nothing new. Ads don’t fuel a free internet. They fuel a business model. The free internet is fueled by the time and donations of kind, dedicated people.

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    27 days ago

    The use of the term “Dark traffic” here is to paint the use of ad-blockers as something nefarious. Don’t use it, fuck these people right in their stupid mouths.

    I propose using the terms “clean traffic”, for ad-blocked website traffic, and “dogshit traffic” for everything else.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      depending on your household’s browsing habits, it can be downright insane how much traffic goes through ones network (and the web at large), that is just nothing but dog shit.

      I monitored my pihole at my place and my own traffic is usually no more than 15% garbage with about 750,000 domains blocked, but the second grandma or grandpa starts doomscrolling boomer things on their phones and ipads. I saw the network traffic at 60% blocked one time and I had to confront them and flatly ask them “what the fuck are you doing on your phone?”

      also set up a Region exemption or whatever, blocking russian, chinese, and a whole bunch of other untrustworthy TLDs and im literally showing my grandmother the repeated attempts to communicate with something in fucking China in real time whilst she’s playing some solitare game she downloaded.

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        I saw the network traffic at 60% blocked one time and I had to confront them and flatly ask them “what the fuck are you doing on your phone?”

        Be careful of the answer. Sometimes ignorance is bliss.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Something simple that people would ask why you want it. Also needs to be non-aggressive. Like non-content traffic. Why would you want something that is not the content?

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      27 days ago

      They are so short sighted to. Ad blocker help advertizers. It allows sites to fill up sites with ads to the point of being unusable while not losing 100% of traffic. That keeps these site relevant enough that old people who don’t have ad blockers end up there too when they follow links or google ranks a site high because it has traffic.

      If they got rid of all ad block somehow they would have to decrease the ads because I wouldn’t use the web. Or online communities would be way more conscious of the ad level of the things they link to.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        27 days ago

        The tech community is pacified into not taking action against the polluters by our adblockers because we don’t see the egregious ads and so we don’t fight the good fight for the user.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          27 days ago

          Ad blockers are the fight. Those users who can’t be bothered to learn a bit about the devices they spend so much time on aren’t owed anything.

          What does “fighting the good fight” even look like to you in this context, anyways?

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            27 days ago

            those users who can’t be bothered to learn
            snooty tech elitism

            What does “fighting the good fight” even look like to you in this context, anyways?
            We built the entire infrastucture, we can poison it’s business model.

            When the first banner ad appeared on the web, the condemnation was not loud enough and it was allowed to fester.
            At this points these entities have become large enough that the evil practice that could have been snuffed out, is now being accepted.
            Now every slimey thing on the internet is due for the mother of all crackdowns. Something like the GDPR times 911.

            I’m not in the mood for centrist technocratic measured solution at the moment.
            If it makes more than a million a year and it’s using any kind of psychological tactics,
            that’s advertising, sponsored search, dark patterns, then BURN IT ALL DOWN

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              27 days ago

              The tech community came up with a technical solution to the ad problem. If the solution you’re looking for isn’t technical, why is your focus on the tech community?

              Anyone can learn this shit. Use any search engine, type “how to block internet ads”, and you’ll see results with “firefox” and “ublock origin”, that can then be put into “how to get” follow up searches.

              The current state of ads is being accepted by those who don’t block them. Everyone who does block them (or refuses to visit ad cancer sites) has cut off that source of revenue, but those who just choose to accept the default option enable them by not just seeing the ads but even sometimes clicking them and buying shit.

    • grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      27 days ago

      Maybe we could turn it around: adblockers are tools that block ads and other kinds of dark traffic such as trackers and malicious scripts.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Well, “dark traffic” sounds SCARY. You wouldn’t want to do anything scary, would you? Like, use the computer you paid for to control the content you want to see? /s

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    27 days ago

    Sites are lazy and greedy. They throw dozens and dozens of 3rd party javascripts into their headers, that punish and annoy people for not using an ad blocker - they slow the site down, bloat the memory, consume energy, track the user and festoon the page with garbage. As soon as people hear that an ad blocker is a thing, then of course they leap at the chance of using one.

    It would be straightforward for sites to insert ads into their content - make the ad urls, images and links indistinguishable from actual content. i.e. serve them up from the same domain, from non predictable paths and use html structure where ads and content are intermingled. Even if an adblocker wanted to block the ads, there are no patterns that work and every single site would require different rules. But that requires effort. I suppose we should be glad that sites don’t do it.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      Exactly, adblockers don’t block a static <div> on the page with some text, an image and a link. It’s only the user-tracking, obtrusive ad-networks they block. Every old-school form of advertising didn’t track users and did just fine. Even today, billboards are priced based on the amount of traffic on the highway, not based on checking inside each car and building a profile on each driver (though I wouldn’t put it past them trying to figure out how to do that soonish).

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        God, I can just see the wet dreams of an advertising exec now. If an australian bloke can replicate million dollar systems with $100, the advertising companies can surely wank out the money for license plate readers a quarter mile ahead of their billboard with good identification. The new electronic billboards already switch what ad they’re showing every half minute or so now, and I bet they could do what ze big boiz do with the auctioning of ads.

        I think right now most of the US doesn’t allow random API access to license plate and registration data, but I really have no idea… How much do you think companies would bribe pay for some laws to be changed about that?

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          Sure, the gov may not allow random API access to license plate registration data, but who knows how many license plates and associated identity are somehow scooped up by some data broker somewhere? You know those parking lots that require an app where you pay parking by entering your licence plate, then logging in with Google/Apple ID, and paying with a credit card? Fuuuuu

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    28 days ago

    When I was about five years old, my parents were shopping for a car. When the radio said Brand X Dealer was the best place to buy a car, I was so excited to tell them what I’d just learned.

    I haven’t forgiven advertising since.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      My daughter has become obsessed with watching videos about the game Wobbly Life. There’s one YouTuber who seems to post extremely frequently and advertises in every video for a subscription mod platform. She is now always asking about that mod platform, and the best way we can explain it to her (because she’s 5 and simply too young to understand what mods even are, has zero room for any nuance on her world views etc.) is we just give her a hard-line “we do not pay for mods”

      • hietsu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Was so proud when my kid stated that ”If the thing is good enough, it does not need advertising. Only poor stuff needs that.”

      • TuffNutzes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        My kid hasn’t ever seen an ad on any streaming service or any web page, ever. And I block ads via DNS. We don’t have any kind of live TV service or cable so they literally have just never seen any ads, ever.

        Sometimes if we’re out at a restaurant, some TV is playing live content and an ad runs. My kid is shocked like it’s the first time he ever ate sugar.

        Glad I can keep that toxic trash out of my house and out of his life.

        • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          Unrelated, but this just brought back memories from long ago when I was a kid and used to watch the advertising channels on purpose. Endless stream of useless gym equipment and weird kitchen tools; they painted such a bizarre and surreal world full of repetition, forced plastic smiles and all sorts of almost otherwordly things that had nothing to do with reality. It was fascinating, almost like watching something of the fae folk

  • anothermember@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    28 days ago

    It’s not about blocking ads for me, that’s a happy side-effect, it’s about owning your computing and taking the necessary protection against tracking. Before “ad blockers” existed I spent a lot of time manually configuring my browser to block websites from connecting me to unnecessary, potentially intrusive third party servers, after all it’s my browser and my internet connection. Now uBlock Origin does that for me, it’s not an ad blocker, it’s a wide spectrum content blocker and the user should have the final say on what they connect to. I think we should stop calling them ad blockers.

  • Gibibit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    27 days ago

    Seeing static banner ads on 2000s websites without popups or tracking: 🤷‍♂️

    Blocking ads on Firefox after popups and other crap started: 😀

    Browsing the internet on Android before I realised the browser supports addons: 🤮

    Blocking ads and tracking on Android via uBlock origin and Privacy Badger: 😀👍

    My feeling of guilt when scummy megacorporations miss out on ad revenue:

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      There are a couple of steps missing at the beginning. There was a time when we only blocked popups; other types of ad were fine, but popups were annoying enough that they needed special attention, and the popup-blocker was usually built-in to the browser without needing an extension. It took a couple of years for the non-popup types of ads to become obnoxious enough to warrant blocking.

  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    mostly desktop, android phone is mostly unusable with ads. use ‘privacy badger’, ‘ublock origin’, ‘umatrix’.

  • chromodynamic@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    28 days ago

    Besides the trackers and malware, ads can be categorised as a flaw in technology. A kind of software parasite that uses a computer’s resources without providing any additional functionality to the user.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Ads are malware (software maliciously made to do something the user doesn’t want), yes. :3

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    27 days ago

    The trade body called it “illegal circumvention technology”, said 12ft.io has been locked by its web host, and promised to take similar action against other paywall bypassing technologies.

    Just because you send bits to my network does not oblige me to render them. That’s like saying I broke the law back when I had cable and changed channels during ad breaks. Falls flat on its face.