You must be age 21+ with a SocialTrust^TM Plus+ MAX! score of 2200+ to access this website. Please scan your federal REAL ID or submit to a retinal scan from a supported device:

Apple iPhone with Apple Intelligence 

Microsoft Windows computer equipped with TPM 3.0 and SecureBoot 

Google Pixel with Android SafetyCore

WARNING: ATTEMPTS TO USE UNAUTHORIZED SOFTWARE SUCH AS LINUX OR A VPN TO ACCESS THIS SYSTEM CONSTITUTES A FELONY!

How about, ONE POINT SEVEN FIVE TRILLION KILOGRAMS PER HECTARE SQUARED!

Or perhaps, TEN BILLION FOOT POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH!

Or even, FOURTEEN MILLION ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTY THREE CUBIC DECILITERS PER YEAR!

$253? Try, SEVENTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX DOLLARS!

I would like to dispute the primary supposition here that pornography is harmful. The use of pornography is nearly universal, and most of the harms that it supposedly causes are symptoms of other issues, or are invented to impose control of sexuality. The ability to reach out with the power of the law to impose religious edicts or project sexual hangups is one of the most esoteric, yet effective, forms of political control available other than violence. If you can control the way that people express their sexuality, you can probably also control their views through the monetization and restriction of sex.

Sexuality and privacy are human rights, and the creation of and access to pornography is protected by the first and fourth amendments under which so-called “age verification” is an unnecessary and excessive burden. If the idea is to prevent access to children, ask yourself why now all adults must now have their access prevented or interrupted.

Furthermore, it is not the state’s role to control childhood sexual development, and the idea that porn is harmful to minors is debatable at best and dubious at worst. Access to objectionable material is solely at the discretion of parents. The fact that they cannot effectively manage this is a symptom of another problem.

When Meta shows teenage girls makeup ads after they delete their selfies, or streaming apps are flooded with violent movies that are easily accessible to minors, this is acceptable. But when I want to watch porn it’s now my job to “protect minors” by compromising my privacy and security?

The real “danger” here is the availability of ideas that do not align with state power.

Except this time the fascist states are nuclear capable. The idea here is to avoid nuclear war.

Move ZIG for great justice!

According to former militia commander Rafeh—who is still living, in hiding, in Afghanistan—the circumstances that shaped Lakanwal were common among resettled militia veterans. “Many former soldiers and militiamen lived for the war and experienced trauma. It’s not compatible with their new lives in Europe or in Northern America. Also, their former NATO allies are abandoning them more and more. Many still don’t have documents while their family members are forced to hide themselves in Afghanistan”, Rafeh said. “If they are also traumatized drug addicts like Lakanwal, they are literal time bombs created through American warfare itself.”

What possible benefit does this offer to Netflix? Are they trying to avoid paying licensing fee or something?

Their push, which includes other priorities, comes as lawmakers gain access to a new $20,000 monthly personal security allowance starting Monday.

How is there no money for healthcare, but there’s money for this?

The constant underlying risk of global thermonuclear holocaust.

I refuse to take sexy AI stuffed animals seriously and nobody can make me.

Oh man, who sells these toys so I can make sure to avoid them? Like, which website specifically There are so many, oh man! It’s so hard to know which specific one to avoid! And also, how do I make sure they can’t be modified to accept a fleshlight? You know, just to make extra sure I don’t get a slutty slop hole of a filth spewing teddy bear that will take on all-comers. No one wants that! That would be disgusting.

The Trump regime killed this woman by unnecessarily putting a military force in an exposed position to perform tasks for which they are ill-suited, just like the US did in Afghanistan. Now, they will callously wield her memory as a political tool to channel racism against Afghan refuges that had the audacity to assist in the US invasion of Afghanistan.

The message is clear: NEVER help the United States government, they will fuck you over just to satisfy the whims of rich narcissists.

Ohhhh shit, blowback? Or false flag maybe?

If the national guard can’t stop gun crime, even against their own forces, why are they there?

Oh I haven’t suffered enough for you while you post all day behind a screen?

I wish this vile woman would take a long tour of the Acme anvil factory on floor cleaning day.

I don’t know why, but somehow this feels worse than the nuclear war.

There is no way forward without about 20-40k public executions, and the seizure of trillions in assets. Dropping nukes on Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and qatar should also be absolutely on the table.

It’s a little unnerving for you to make a fair bit of sense, and then to see this little tidbit of insanity slip in there. Disregarding the call for institutional public execution, I would like to formally object to your plan for nuclear war with the Middle East, please.

There is a lot of policy failure and blowback that contributes to this, but I like to think the party and the people are finally unable to tolerate Trump’s narcissistic abuse.

This idea of a government based on the destruction of perceived enemies is not sustainable, and is constantly eating itself for sustenance. At some point, you have to actually figure out where money for food is going to come from and screaming into the void about Democrats, immigrants, and abortion doesn’t pay the bills. The American people need healthcare, housing, education, childcare, food, and hope. NOT ICE raids, bizarre southern military excursions, shutdowns, and traumatized federal workers.

To me, this is a wonderful reminder that our votes still matter, and our system - as large and slow and complex as it is - has careful structure and momentum. The Republican Party still must respond as such.