Should Donald Trump fail a second time to be re-elected he faces the very real possibility of jail time and massive financial penalties due to the sheer volume of criminal cases and civil lawsuits that are on hold until after the election.

That is the opinion of Syracuse University law professor Greg Germain who explained in an interview with Newsweek that the former president’s only path to get out from under the federal cases he now faces is to beat Vice President Kamala Harris in less than two weeks and then push the Department of Justice to drop the cases filed against him.

As Germain stated, the multiple federal cases Trump is facing are solid and his only path to victory may be having them shut down.

Newsweek source: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-legal-cases-georgia-washington-florida-new-york-stormy-daniels-chutkan-cannon-1974406

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    criminal cases and civil lawsuits that are on hold until after the election.

    Why are they on hold? It’s insane it’s taken so long to push those cases, and it’s even more insane if they are on hold.
    Trump is a normal citizen, and shouldn’t enjoy special privileges.

    Except USA is no-longer a country of law, it’s a corrupt oligarchy.

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Always has been but normal people just finally starting to understand how bad it really is.

      Modern oligarchs dont even pretend anymore and they dont have since peasants are fighting each. They dont care who wins elections for the most part as they will mostly get what they want either way

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Except USA is no-longer a country of law, it’s a corrupt oligarchy.

      It’s always been this way. The internet just does a better job of propagating information about it.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        No, Nixon stepped down because of Watergate, you won’t see similar honesty from Republicans today.
        They are exploiting the judicial system, and to Prosecute Trump for things he did in the open as president to enrich himself and his family isn’t pursued, even now after 8 years.
        After Nixon the Republicans decided to try to control the courts and the political narrative, so they never would lose a case either legally or in the public eye like Watergate again.
        Republicans have been systematically undermining USA for 5 decades now.

        It’s way past the time to stop it, If Harris doesn’t win, and start the process towards legal and political normalcy, it could easily be to late.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Merrick Garland is a failure of epic proportions. It is a small silver lining that the Repugs blocked his Supreme Court nomination, not that their picks were better.

    • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I get the frustration, but I also get where the authorities are coming from. Imagine if precident gets set that a political candidate can be mired down in lawsuits, regardless if they’re plausible or not. Then someone like trump comes along and says cool that worker great against me, I’ll just throw a shit ton of made up lawsuits and cases against all my future opponents.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        No that’s a false narrative, the criminal cases are based on public prosecutors running them.
        What you are claiming is for civil suits, of which a couple have been settled, despite obstruction attempts by Trump.
        If it gets to a point where a politician can ask public prosecutors to put opponents in jail, USA has long ceased to be a democracy.

        Trump is already a convicted criminal, and cannot vote in several states, still he can run for president, and enjoy privileged treatment.
        Where an ordinary person voting because she was told she could, got 5 years prison for voter fraud!

      • jettrscga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Except that he’s explicitly choosing to be a political candidate for the purpose of avoiding the lawsuits. A lot of these allegations occurred before he announced he was re-running, and then the lawsuits got put on hold.

        Your scenario creates a method for anyone to delay consequences by running for office. Although we both know it wouldn’t really work for anyone. Trump gets his special treatment.

      • Volkditty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        In your scenario, do you imagine that all the Trump-appointed prosecutors and the Trump-appointed judges will willingly delay the cases of Trump’s “enemies of the state” until after the election out of some respect for the sanctity of the democratic process?

        It is a horrible, dangerous precedent to say we can’t justly hold the guilty accountable because some bad actor in the future may unjustly hold the innocent accountable.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I for one am livid that I’ll have to wait until after the election to see the disappointing wrist slaps he might get from whichever cases don’t get sabotaged by sympathetic judges.

    • espentan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      It really is outrageous.

      I suppose “I’m running for president, let me go” is the new thing to say if you don’t feel like going to prison right away. /s

        • Orbituary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It is a federal crime to threaten the president with harm or death. It’s a guarantee a federal agent will look deeper at people who make statements like the one you made.

          • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Is it really a threat to muse about what could happen as some random person on the internet?
            It’s not like OP announced to do it or called for it to be done.
            I’d see it differently if a person with a lot of followers (especially crazy ones) would dare to think something like this aloud. Does this law cover former presidents as well?

            Anyway… Remember: it’s a losing battle trying to be tolerant of the intolerant!

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              In normal context, this likely wouldnt amount to a threat however comments like this about high ranking official esp ex Pres will most definitely getting flagged for a review to asses validity of the threat.

              This is just how the system works. And these comments attract spooks so people should be mindful.

              I am not sure if kill the rich comments get similar attention but i wouldnt be surprised.

          • ravhall@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            No one is looking into me, sooo, you’re wrong.

            It is my personal opinion, that his elimination would be better for society. I’m allowed to say whatever I want. And if the “fed” wants to bitch, they can message me and I’ll come down and have a little chat with them. Which will go nowhere, as you know…

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    We don’t get to have nice things.

    Not only is he going to win, by ratfuckery or otherwise, he’s going to jail people like Kamala and Schiff for made up nonsense… We sat through almost a decade of bullshit delays and everybody treating Trump like a king, but he’s going to have his sycophants lay the hammer down immediately on his opponents…

    I really really really really hope I get proven wrong…

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago
    Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Raw Story:

    Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus that Raw Story is generally unreliable for factual reporting, based upon a pattern of publishing false and sensationalized stories. Editors almost unanimously agree that the source is biased and that in-text attribution should accompany each use of the source.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.rawstory.com/trump-legal-peril-2669486881/?

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support