Slavery never left it just got rebranded.

The Thirteenth Amendment needs to be amended.

Per Wikipedia: The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. The amendment was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, by the House of Representatives on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the required 27 of the then 36 states on December 6, 1865, and proclaimed on December 18, 1865. It was the first of the three Reconstruction Amendments adopted following the American Civil War.

  • Mose13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Slavery was never made fully illegal in the US. And if you vaguely define some crimes like “loitering” you can easily arrest people you disagree with.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is a reason the US has 20% of the world’s prison population but only 5% of the actual world population. It is one of the many injustices thrust upon our society by the ruling class for their benefit.

  • nieminen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2023/09/27/updated_race_data/

    graph showing the huge difference in per-capita imprisonments of black Americans vs white

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States

    this is the data that racists (like Kirk) use to justify white supremacy. But the wrongful conviction rate is proven to be nearly the same.

    https://eji.org/news/study-shows-race-is-substantial-factor-in-wrongful-convictions/

    The report, Race and Wrongful Convictions in the United States 2022, reviewed the cases of 3,200 innocent defendants exonerated in the U.S. since 1989 and found that Black Americans are seven times more likely than white Americans to be falsely convicted of serious crimes. This is true across all major crime categories except for white collar crime, the report said.

    We didn’t end slavery, just made it palatable to the masses by labeling it “punishment for a crime”. They just need people to feel superior to those being exploited. Claiming it’s because whites were superior stopped being effective for the majority, so they made it so it seems they do more crime instead.

    Additionally, there is more crime in predominantly black areas, but it’s not because “black people are more violent” or whatever the hell, it’s because racism has made it crazy difficult for black individuals that aren’t born rich to progress. They were only sold houses or given apartments in certain areas, forced into poverty by lack of given opportunity, and while (I hope) that’s less today, there has been a lasting effect on the general population. When you have to do crime to keep you and your family safe and fed, you do crime.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Any time somebody tries to tell me that racism isn’t really a thing anymore (yes, they do), I always ask:

      “Black people have six times the incarceration rate of white people. That can mean one of two things: there’s systemic racism, OR they are committing more crimes because it’s in their nature as a race. So, which is it?”

      They never want to answer. They have to keep the mask on. No matter how hard I press for an answer, they never give one and get pissed off. It’s very telling.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        That can mean one of two things: there’s systemic racism, OR they are committing more crimes because it’s in their nature as a race. So, which is it?”

        The racists will answer “it’s the crimes”.

        Fucking Kirk died with this lie on his lips.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is a good picture of “polite” racism in the North, too. We won’t call them the N word, we’ll just have them taken away.

      • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, makes me wonder who’s in the meat packing plants in WI; I’m sure the answer is more depressing than I thought.

    • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Racists never wish to discuss the nuance. When discussing culture, behavior, and intelligence of the black population, they never wish to discuss the myriad of variables that would cause any negative outcomes. It’s so complicated and does not come down to one race being superior. I will never understand racism.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        When discussing culture

        Also racists have a shit taste in music, can you imagine the 20th century US music scene without black musicians? What the hell would americana have to point to proudly if it weren’t for the countless black artists that built entire new worlds here?

        Like… do they think we get Elvis without black culture??? hahahahaha white people in the US would still be playing fiddles on top of hay bales if weren’t for black people, not that there is anything wrong with that activity but like… just look at how little country music ever changes vomits in mouth a little.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The US is a prison nation.

    If we have a civil war, that can change. I can’t think of better recruits for soldiery and domestic, than those who have been wronged by the opposing force. It is a silver lining to the deterioration of the USA, if this evil can be dispelled for good.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most of the US hates their neighbor/s, hence the strong anti-immigration push. That’s beside the ingrained racism.

      If a civil war breaks out, it’ll be every man for himself or a loyalty pact based on color, origin, religion or geography like Afghanistan or Myanmar.

      There won’t be a “us vs them”, it’ll be “us vs all of the others”.

      But fantacizing about gravy seals is what ya’ll do best.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No no no, in my defense fantasy we all rise up and take out the ruling class and then slowly become just like them.

    • Cassanderer@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What makes you think there will be organized resistance to the party?

      Just oppression, purges, projection onto groups to be persecuted, and their assets atole.

      The disfavored first, soon for the end of seizing their assets.

      Not civil war, oligarcgic repression, as it looks now.

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand how this is so prevalent. Can a prisoner refuse, or just stand there without working? It’s not like the twenty cents an hour or whatever they get is going to make their time much better. Or if their sentences get reduced for arbitrary menial work, that seems like a robbery of justice to victims. Is working in a sweatshop sort of deal so much better than reading books in a prison cell?

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends on where you wind up. You usually get punished, but some places are worse than others about it.

      The most common punishment for refusing to work is suspending “privileges” like the ability to buy from commissary or recreation like yard time or visiting the library. Remember that it’s common for hygiene items to only be available for purchase from commissary, so by denying you commissary access, they’re effectively saying you can’t buy extra tampons if you refuse to work.

      At worst, it can be a reason to put you in isolation, move you to a higher security prison, or deny you parole.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a scam, like everything in modern prisons. They intentionally underfeed prisoners, so that you have to buy extra food from the prison store, where it’s overpriced but at least you’ll get the calories and nutrients you need to stay healthy. Most prisoners don’t have external income, so they are forced to work those prison jobs for pennies on the dollar.

      And this is just one example of how prison administrators have intentionally set things up to fuck over prisoners as much as possible. In the U.S., it is sad but true that a large percent of the general public simply does not care, they think the prisoners “deserve it”.

      Oh, and those books you’re talking about, do you think those come for free? Do you think you’ll get them if you’re on the guards’ shit list because you’re too lazy to work? That varies by location, but you can be sure that there’s no guarantees of access to literature.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s pretty common for people to be released before they’ve served their full sentence. It makes sense if we were to consider the purpose of prison to be rehabilitation — someone who cooperates is far more likely to be deemed safe to release. The problem is that the penal system barely pays lip-service to rehabilitation. Ideologically, it seems like it’s split between two, often contradictory models: the rehabilitative approach, and the punitive approach.

      If someone is in for a crime where early parole seems likely (if good behaviour), then it’s not so much that their sentence is being reduced for doing the menial work, but that they will experience an effective increase to their sentence if they refuse to work.

      Plus even if someone was unlikely to get parole, I imagine they’d still be pretty disincentivised to resist. I know someone who did time, and there was a particular prison guard who hated her, and when this guard was working, she would often find that her food was bad in some way, such as mouldy bread (She struggled with depression and suicidality, which meant there were periods where she would eat her food in her cell alone, rather than in the canteen). She would also receive disproportionate punishment for things under this guard, such as being sent to solitary confinement if someone tried to start a fight with her. I think the original beef with this guard started when my friend spat in her face during initial processing, but my point is that guards have an insane amount of power to make someone’s already miserable life even worse. I wouldn’t be surprised if refusing to work might lead to privileges being removed for the entire group, which would mean the guards wouldn’t even need to punish you — the other prisoners would do it.

      The prison system is disgustingly inhumane even when they’re following all the rules they’re meant to. It’s even worse in reality though, because of how little accountability there is. People trying to push for political change constantly hit a wall because the average politician doesn’t want to stick their neck out for prisoners, and the average voter thinks of themselves as ontologically different to prisoners (who they see as criminals who deserve everything they get (which also ignores the fact that a heckton of innocent people are in prison))

      " Or if their sentences get reduced for arbitrary menial work, that seems like a robbery of justice to victims"

      Victims are already robbed of justice. They are dragged through the courts, often being retraumatised again and again, because the system cares more about punishment of criminals than it does about actually helping people heal from a crime. As someone who has been a victim of a violent crime, one of the most painful things was learning that the same person who had robbed me had gone on to do more severe crimes after their release. I hate knowing that the prison system made that outcome more likely, and I wonder whether there might have been more justice in the world had I not reported my attack. It feels like the sentence they got for robbing me might as well have been a death sentence, from what I’ve heard about them after they were released. Society says “once a criminal, always a criminal”, and then it puts you in a context where all you can be is a criminal. It’s fucked up and it hurts my heart to think about. Someone made a victim of me, and that was something awful that should never have happened. However, it’s not justice to then turn that person into a victim too (especially as I learned that they had had a pretty fucked up life before attacking me. It doesn’t excuse it, but it does help to explain it).

      Sorry. That got longer and heavier than I expected. I feel quite strongly about this topic.

  • dudesss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good time to look into splitting and sharing your Costco membership. Possibly remove you and your partner, and go half with someone else.

  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The 13th amendment says that slavery’s abolished. Look at all these slave master posing on your dollar.

            • roofuskit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Correct. In fact the south almost immediately turned to convict leasing. They could round up and convict black men for pretty much any reason they could think of. Typically “vagrancy,” aka not having a job. And they re-enslaved them quite legally. Keep in mind black people were not permitted to stand as witnesses in pretty much any courtroom of the time. It did not matter if any charges made were accurate, conviction was pretty much assured.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even the punishment for possessing black people cocaine vs white people cocaine is ridiculous. The former used to be a mandatory 5 year sentence, the latter you could walk away with a probation. Fair sentencing act reduced the discrepancy a bit, but not completely IIRC.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    No no no. They’re just temporarily relieved of their bootstraps. Once out, they can again be free and rich. Now, you take a barbarian country like China, Iran, or (gasp) Russia, those countries are crazy. They’re the bad guys.

    We’re the good guys.

    See? Simple. Now let’s go check what’s on Netflix.