You must log in or register to comment.
Damn even the cop is cute. Is this a TV production or something?
ACAB
All cops are beautiful?
Bastards can sometimes be attractive, unfortunately.
Not only cute, but she looks cool.
I like aviator sunglasses and I still don’t think I’ve ever thought a cop looked inherently cool (I can imagine a bomb defuser looking cool in the moment, but that’s just because of what they’re doing)
She only looks cool because she looks like she’s part of a rag-tag team of underdogs who infiltrated the courtroom to bust him out. She probably has telekinetic powers.
Except for the last part, this could totally read as an A-Team bit
She does look like she’d get cast as B.A. Baracus in the inevitable all-female reboot
I’d watch that show.
Every time I see a picture of him I’m reminded of this
I know a girl in Huntington, PA who has the same skill. Just ridiculously photogenic.
Well genic is in the adjective itself, so I’m gonna guess it’s got to do with genes
That’s cute to you? 🤮
I’m not into tattoos but something about her arm kind of gets me going. Might by it’s proximity to Luigi.
I thought we had “innocent until proven guilty”. But instead we have a convicted felon for president who’s a pedophile friend, and a guy named Luigi Mangione in jail while we don’t even know who really did it.
When asked if people would rather have some innocent people get jailed, or some guilty people set free (in court).
The majority said they’d rather have some innocent people get jailed. Which to me seems like the worst of both worlds. An innocent person behind bars. And the real criminal is free.
I don’t have a source. Something I remember seeing maybe 10 years ago but it stuck with me. Feel free to ask those you know the question, see what they answer.
Look at that face! That is not the face of a cold blooded murderer! That is the face of caring person who sees the injustices and wanted to protect the country when other avenues have failed.
Luigi shouldn’t be in jail. The insurance racket should be the one facing possible death penalties.
Everyone’s favorite conservative rich kid that only did something when he was personally affected.
Well he, allegedly, did a good thing.
Considering there has been no consequence, he just murdered a dude.
He didn’t even have a United health care policy
At least he did something other than virtue signaling online
He didn’t do jack shit. Nothing has changed. There has been no wave of CEO assassinations.
He did do jack shit, he allegedly shot and killed a CEO. I understand that you are disappointed this didn’t lead to further slayings, but as I said, at least he did something. If you are dissatisfied that there hasn’t been more things done, I would encourage you to be the change you want to see in the world, rather than just crying about it on the Internet.
He killed a scapegoat. He did NOTHING aside from take a father from teenage children.
I don’t want to see a wave of assassinations, anyone who thinks they’re going to “scare” corporations into doing the right thing is fucking stupid.
Meanwhile, we let Republicans take, who offer zero chance of any reform.
I don’t think that’s true. I made the prediction, after that healthcare CEO got shot, that Stochastic Political Assassinations would be the hip new thing, and I think this past year has proven me right.
Charlie Kirk, multiple Trump attempts, the Pennsylvania Governor’s mansion got firebombed.
Those legislators in Minnesota getting assassinated
Some smaller CEOs had attempts on their lives also, Like the Michigan company president who got stabbed
So, no more healthcare CEOs didn’t get got, but people across the political spectrum have.
That officer is a named character. Her importance will be revealed during the big twist of this arc.
I can fix him. And if I can’t, I can fix his sink, his tires, his shirt stains, anything he wants.
Can’t fix what’s not broken
I’m about to break something, then 👀
Mangione might be the richest person Lemmy loves.
He’s also a Musk fanboy and rails about the “woke mind virus”.
Which is interesting, if Luigi is conservative, does he oppose universal healthcare?
any citations for that? or…?
You’re on the wrong website buddy.
We get it, no one is pure enough for you.
I dont care what his political beliefs are, hes a comrade of mine.
Why did you stop at Musk. Why not Hitler?
He violently opposes getting screwed over by somebody. You know, like, I don’t know… somebody in the mafia might.
It’s either him or Taylor Swift.
deleted by creator
I’m so glad we have actual freedom of speech on Lemmy
No fucking auto-mods to ban us for mentioning a person’s name because it hurts advertising revenue
Also I don’t think there’s a jury in the entire United States that would actually convict Luigi
Idk man. We got about 1/3rd of the country gleefully supporting actual child rapist Donald Trump
I’m so glad we have actual freedom of speech on Lemmy
Eh…
Have to go to .ml to properly comment about american imperialism and other things that jordan doesn’t like.
Have to go anywhere but .ml (except slurping up more of that .world slop) to properly criticize china, russia, or north korea.
Have to go to hexbear to see my pig shit on pig balls.
Have to go to tiny, one user communities to see insane harry potter fan fics…
What is this world coming to? Why can’t I have it all? Free speech? 6/10, provides a minimum, but could be better. Would use again.
User was banned for this comment
A ban from .ml is a badge of honor.
lemmy.ml joined the chat
Never been banned by an .ml mod. Now .world? Some real psychos there.
I’ve had the opposite experience. I was mobbed and then site-banned by .ml for mildly criticizing communism in China and defending my opinion. But the hateful, rule-breaking comments, the derision, the incivility–all of that stayed up right where it was.
Neither did I. I went ahead and banned their instance before they ban me. 😉😉
If you say someone bad specifically about russia or china, .ml mods are likely remove your comments.
You talk about healthcare ceos or nazis and you risk getting moderated here.
I recieved both a ban and a death threat from a .ml mod.
My opinion was that Harris would have been better than Trump. I even included that I didn’t even like her or the democrats. I just view them as, unfortunately, the better option right now.
They told me I should be executed and thrown in a pit with the rest of the garbage (ie the other people they view as undesirable) and promptly banned. It was a crazy escalation
Can you share their comment/message?
.ML needs to be exposed further as too many people defend them because they don’t realise how scum they are.
.ml is a shit hole and bans more than any other instances.
I even remember seeing evidence how the admins have altered modlogs before to hide what they do.
lol lemmy.ml wouldn’t ban someone for posting about Luigi, are you being for real right now?
Maybe not Luigi specifically, but freedom of speech on ml is… questionable.
I agree, although I feel like that’s across the board for Lemmy. Mods aren’t all joining together and discussing the rules they will enforce. Every community has its own idea of how moderation works, and we all do what we see fit or please. I’ve seen some stupid shit on the modlogs everywhere, often using the ban and remove content feature that essentially scrubs the user’s history, which imo should be fixed.
I do feel like .ml takes that to an extreme, though. Like, what do you mean you can’t criticize Russia or China without being banned by an admin? Dessalines is especially guilty of this, and the other admins deflect and defend his behavior.
Have they banned you yet for being obsessed? They should.
Thanks for proving their point.
What are you talking about?
Also I don’t think there’s a jury in the entire United States that would actually convict Luigi
Is he that good looking?
I mean, have you kinda ignored the whole of US politics? Finding 12 people that will have him killed is easy.
Yeah exactly. I’m not as optimistic. But hopefully his lawyer doesn’t let the prosecution stack the jury.
Didn’t his legal defense fund pass $1 mil? I’d think it wouldn’t be that hard to avoid letting that happen in NYC.
I don’t know enough about high profile cases like this to know if one mill is a lot or not though. I feel like it’s not but I have no idea.
you could probably find 12 people to execute him just because he’s Italian.
Good thing we thought of that already (250 years ago or so) and don’t let the prosecution just pick whoever they want to be on the jury.
Here, have a read: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/jury-selection-criminal-cases.html
I’m mistaken, then, sounda as well thought out as the rest of the US system, like the winner-takes-all “democracy.”
Man, those guys 250 years ago were so smart! Like so smart you should never ever do anything differently than they’d do it.
It’s a pretty bedrock part of every nation with trials by jury that the accusers don’t get to unilaterally select the jury. “Finding 12 people that will have him killed” would as you said, be easy. So would finding 12 people that would not. That’s why the prosecution and the defense are given equal powers to appoint and reject jurors, in a process that sometimes goes on longer than the actual trial.
It’s interesting to me to note the differences in jury selection between the US and Australia: here in Aus (at least in my state of NSW) both sides get to strike jurors, but there isn’t a round of questioning - it’s purely based on physical appearance - and each side only gets three challenges (per accused person). That means for most trials, those with only one defendant, at least six of the original randomly selected jurors will end up serving.
I’ve done jury service twice - once I was part of the original 12 and wasn’t challenged, and the other time I replaced the last challenged juror but each side only ended up challenging two.
I feel like not being able to question jurors and having limited strikes makes the system far more random and, therefore, more just in terms of the jury being a random selection of citizens.
That is really interesting the differences there. I think the intended goal of the US system is to make sure that you get 12 people capable of being objective about the subject at hand, rather than 12 random people. For example, it usually takes all 12 jurors to make a conviction, so if you get just one person who won’t convict no matter what because of religious reasons or pre-existing biases or whatever, then automatically you have a hung jury that can’t be swayed by evidence. So the US system tries to insure we get 12 people who are willing to put aside their biases and be objective (enough) to render a verdict based on the facts before them either way the facts lead. So it’s a long process, but in our system anyway we try to weed out anybody who might believe, for example, that all Mexicans are criminals if it’s a Mexican on trial, or someone who doesn’t believe that rape should be a crime in a rape case. And the big one of course, people who are already so convinced by media they’ve consumed that the person is guilty that they can’t act as a fair juror.
Yeah, it seems clear that the goals are different and so the methods of selection have to be different in order to try to achieve those goals. I wonder if there are any statistics available to determine what approach results in more accurate results in terms of convictions! Personally I see the merit in both approaches, and potentially in other approaches to the jury selection process.
deleted by creator
This reminds me that we need a c/MemeEconomy because this image is going to the moon.
💎 🙌🏻
We Like the Stock
I hope he gets off cos I’m about to 😩
His trial is still ongoing but you’re guilty and going to horny jail
We need some posts about Charlie’s dispatcher, too, they were doing every bit of god’s work.
It’s concerning how quiet the media is about him. And there’s been a lot of confusion about the evidence in that case. The guy supposedly changing his outfit, the rifle supposedly being assembled and disassembled, there was a note that “got lost”, the trans girlfriend that has “disappeared” it’s conspiracy theory level of shady.
Kash solved the shit out of that case, like Scooby Doo. Don’t worry about it
ruh roh
deleted by creator
Someone should run for the governor of NY on a platform of offering Mangione a full pardon.
They would win in a landslide.
I somehow doubt that. I understand people think the healthcare companies were shite, but most people don’t believe vigilante murder is fine
That’s what the news kept reporting.
It’s not the reaction I was seeing, in person or online.
When justice no longer serves the people, the people must serve justice.
Mamdani won already, but Mamdani needs to also just pardon Luigi as a gesture of fuck you to private insurance.
That isn’t how government works.
If government ‘worked’ then nothing Trump has done would have been done. It turns out you can just do stuff.
That’s not how this works. A mayor can’t pardon someone for state crimes.
Mamdani won the mayoral election. Kathy Hochul is the governor.
He’s a mayor. Mayors can’t do that.
Then I stand corrected. But if and when (and I am really hoping here) Luigi goes free I want Mamdani to at least shake his hand.
yeah because we don’t have enough islamophobia
I think we should make owning the conservative fascists a point. They have always been accusing anyone opposed to them of doing this shit even if we didn’t. Why not give them a well earned fuck you?
there are people who can afford to do it and people who cannot. minorities know this very well. mamdani represents multiple minorities whether he wants to or not. he cannot do this.
He should run then call the trial a political which hunt
