• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s what I thought church was all about when I was a little kid. By the age of 8 I knew it was a boatload of crap as there were more mean people in church than nice and friendly ones. Even when they introduced 360 degree handshaking, it still felt contrived.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I learned at a very young age that church’s real purpose is to make shitty people feel better about themselves.

      • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah. One day in the middle of mass everyone started shaking hands with the person on their right, pew ahead, their left and pew behind. It freaked me out the first time I experienced it. All of the pained smiles. This started in early to mid seventies. I don’t know if they still do it. It was a small town roman catholic venue.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah if we could track every dollar of my taxes and exactly where its going, that’d be awesome. But we already know where its going in america- war and politicians pockets.

  • Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    4 days ago

    I do mind, actually. In that I specifically want my taxes to go to that rather than going to more bombs for genociding Palestinians.

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Absolutely, absolutely.

      Okay what about a diversity initiative to fight antisemitism (in in the brains of young children and structurally in hospitals)?

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Structurally in hospitals? I don’t see what hospitals have to do with anti semitism

  • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you house the homeless they are no longer homeless so you can’t house them so they become homeless and then you need to house them and then they are no longer homeless so you can’t house them and then they become….

    Sorry, got in a little loop there. Point being, taking care of people is ok. That’s what money is for. Even after the acute need has passed.

    • dublet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Every single study shows that it is economically cheaper to house the homeless. You literally save money. Less costs needed for policing, health care, social services and all that stuff.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        But without the threat of homelessness nobody will work for me for what I want to pay them with how I want to treat them!

      • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ah! But! Then you create a more functional society with less inequality and greater overall stability! An economy less prone to outlandish bubbles the wealthy can exploit to get even wealthier! Even positive trends in medical outcomes for the population at large!

        Plus all those poor cops you’ve put out of a job! Those are good union jobs, man!

        So there are trade-offs!

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well tough tits, they’re going to killing brown children and making rich people more rich and you’ll like it or you’ll make them rich from within the modern slave system.

  • 13igTyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    “But what about the tax subsidies for billionaires? Won’t someone think of the billionaires for once?”

  • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m probably paraphrasing someone famous but the quality of a society is measured by the way it treats the vulnerable.

  • Guthix@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some people would feed 99 people who don’t need it if it meant feeding 1 person who did. Other people would refuse to feed 99 people who need it if it also means feeding 1 person who doesn’t.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    “I don’t mind” is far too passive.

    I want my taxes to benefit the people on the streets far, far more than the wealthy.

  • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t want people to go hungry or be homeless because one day I could be hungry or homeless through no fault of my own.

  • lukaro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unless of course they voted for people who don’t think that way. I don’t want to help anyone not willing to help someone else.

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 days ago

    In fact, I insist.

    The fact that people would rather see their taxes bomb a brown person’s house instead of building 10 is sickening.

    • Instigate@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s somehow simultaneously terrible economic management and terrible ethical management. There’s just no upside to anyone but the Military Industrial Complex which funds the politicians. I really wish more people could understand that.