• Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Newsome too busy pandering to shareholder grifters to actually do anything that helps the working class

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It is contrary to Elon Musk’s interests to build public transport. He wants it to be private and operated by him. See the robotaxi and all the bullshit with his tunnels which even at the diameter they bore could accommodate a proper mass transit system but don’t and never will.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The point of hyperloop and the boring company was to kill real public transport projects. He probably doesn’t care if those companies make money or not. As long as he can fuck up public transportation projects by claiming to a better alternative.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Are you really saying you want an authoritarian to make the trains run on time?

    Don’t you think that’s a little unoriginal?

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You don’t have to have the authoritarianism, China is simply doing the most cost effective way of providing public transit for as many people as possible.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They are only able to do it because their authoritarian regime… It’s easy to do mass public works when you flay anyone that resists…

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They are only able to do it because their authoritarian regime

          Ridiculous. Not even gonna waste my time. 0/10 apply yourself

        • Darkness343@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          How can I implement this in my third world country?

          We truly need something different than the corrupt democracy we have here.

          It’s the government of the people, for the people, by the people, but the people is stupid lazy and easily corrupted

  • Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    California never cancelled the high speed rail, it’s just taking forever because it’s so easy to mire any project in bureaucracy and lawsuits.

    On the plus side, it’s probably the hardest regulatory environment to do such things, so, once it’s finished, my hope is that it’ll lead to an explosion of high speed rail now that it can be done with the benefit of all of the lessons learned.

    I mean, at least we’re still fuckin trying.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s more the fact that our topography is extremely difficult to make level to the degree that true high speed rail needs. Most of the environmental review, and land acquisition (the hardest and legal parts) are mostly wrapped up from San Jose into LA now.

      The bigger issue with what’s made this project take more time IMO (and as a California resident) is that we basically refused the help of high speed rail engineers and designers from the EU and Japan. They showed up the day after the initial prop passed to help and we turned them away. We like to try and do things our own way here in Cali and sometimes that really bites us in the ass. I’d rather have some of those tax dollars “leave” the state or country in exchange for knowledgeable people helping us get it done faster.

      Also, I’d advise anybody who can to drive around the Central Valley. The scale of high speed rail projects and the size of them is INSANE. Especially compared to the surrounding environment.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember when the Texas Lone Star Rail project between Austin and San Antonio finally got “fully funded.” I was in college taking a transportation systems course, and one of our guest speakers was the director of the project.

      I realized how doomed we were when I found out she was the only employee of the project and only worked 20 hours a week - almost all of which was speaking engagements.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pretty sure like 80% of it got put on hold indefinitely. They are doing only like Fresno to Bakersfield or some bullshit instead.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re not wrong. It’s mired in legal BS. Lawyers saw deep pockets and NIMBYS, and are dragging their feet through the courts and are making free money while costing taxpayers multiple of millions.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      mire any project in beuracracy and lawsuits

      That may have been true in the 2010s for cal hsr, but at this point the thing holding it up is just money. The environmental review is done for the segment between san Francisco and Los Angeles and everything has been cleared and construction is going on for the initial Bakersfield to Merced segment. There’s just no money to build it, the only consistent form of funding for it is California cap and trade sales which only nets $750 million annually on a project estimated to cost well over $100 billion. They occasionally get some money from the federal government only to have that taken away or suspended whenever trump gets in office.

      That’s what really separates China from the US, the people in control of their tax dollars are using them to build infrastructure for the people instead of using it on billionaire tax breaks and to make jets and bombs to drop on Palestinians.

    • meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly- California has to negotiate with every landowner, government agency, business, etc. to build a railroad. China doesn’t have to deal with that. If they want to tear down a building, they just do it without caring much about the person they are taking it from. Authoritarianism is really good at doing big things really fast.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        tbf I’d rather have my landlord’s house eminent domain’d if it meant high-speed rail.

      • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        No they don’t. They offer compensation and if the owner still refuses they build around them. That’s what leads to all those wacky photos of highways going around a single house.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve heard it mostly goes the other way (I mean even the US has eminent domain), do you have any examples of the wacky highways/railroads?

              • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                What difference is there in telling someone “hey we need to demolish your house for a highway/railway please accept this compensation”

                • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  In China? A lot. It’s the difference between a national need and a local want.

                  It’s in how they’ve prioritized things. The owner will still get compensated but they can’t say no.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s why China is going to win. The west is fighting itself and only planning 4 years in advance. And can’t puss off the voters or we won’t get in again. Then it switches sides and everything gets torn down.

    Where China just does it and can plan long term. At this point I don’t k kw which system is better. Used to think democracy but it just seems to crumble and honestly most people don’t care enough that they are easily controlled.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      piss off voters

      Do you think voters hate cheap, fast, convenient travel? Do you think they’d just hate freedom healthcare too?

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every system is imperfect when taken to its natural conclusion, that’s why most rich countries are moving towards social democracies in which capitalism is generally restrained, but that’s a fairly new thing in its own right, and what’s to say capitalism won’t corrode them in time? Very little, grand scheme of thing. This is why the founding fathers talked about a rolling revolution, needing each generation to see clearly as threats would be constant. Instead we watch Netflix while our decisions are made for us in halls we will likely never walk. Unfortunately I think we are in for the suffering phase, Hindus say we’re already in kali yuga, which is the FAFO end of the whole cosmic cycle, hopefully towards the very end if you believe in such things. Personally I think we’re just fucked.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        that’s why most rich countries are moving towards social democracies in which capitalism is generally restrained

        ???

        What planet do you live on? This is literally the opposite of what’s happening.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You forgot the part where California decides to dump Elon and keep going on it’s own project, only for Trump to try and shut it down.

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    China: We are building out infrastructure because it is good for our people.

    The US: Auuuurrrggghh! WHoSe GoNnA PaY FoR ThiS!? WheN CaN I ExPecT a PROFIT!?

    • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      US: We need to make 500 more billionaires, and we could probably do both the same time, but why risk it.

    • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      China: we are building out infrastructure because it is good for the people

      Lemmitors: no, that’s actually because they’re very authoritarian, building public infrastructure for public use is exactly what evil dictators do

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Reasonable people: no, it’s because it’s good for their people and economy, but that has no bearing on whether the country is authoritarian or not.

        China Good and China Bad are equally annoying opinions to me.

        I’d still choose to live in China over the USA any day though haha

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Authoritarian is when Elon Musk doesn’t have the freedom to choose whether you build HSR or not.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

      Michael Parenti

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    2 days ago

    This was the most infuriating bullshit. Why is anyone listening to Musk? He’s there to line his pockets, that’s it.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      People fall for the con man that only has “concepts of plans”, the con man with actual “plans” is literally invisible to them let alone a blind spot.

    • poopsmith@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s there to line his pockets, that’s it.

      Well, that and widespread promotion of fascism, misogyny, homophobia, and white supremacy.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Musk has nothing to do with the woes of the California High Speed Rail project. He’s just commenting from the peanut gallery and getting picked up by the news. He admitted hyperloop was never a serious proposal and it never factored into the actual decision making process for the project.

      The reason the project is so delayed is because of democracy. It’s a long distance route so it crosses many different county lines and properties along the way. Each of those counties have their own municipal governments involved and there are lots of private property holders along the way too. Couple that with the public consultations, the bidding for all the contracts, the environmental assessments (which are the bane of every construction project in California), and the high cost of labour for workers in California (and USA generally).

      All of this comes long after the US had engaged in the process of outsourcing manufacturing and importing (in the form of undocumented workers and other low-skilled migrants) its construction workforce. This has left the US very badly equipped to handle large construction projects even after finally approving them. The US is a very different country, skill- and education-wise, from the New Deal era of the 1930s.

      • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        The reason the project is so delayed is because of democracy.

        Next four largest high speed rail networks are in Spain, Japan, France, and Germany… which might not be perfect democracies, but are certainly far from the worst.

        Democracy isn’t the problem, and you certainly don’t need to be a dictatorship to get things done.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s our court system specifically. Anyone can sue for anything, and litigation is used to solve the problem. It takes forever and billions are wasted on lawyers. That’s a big reason. Also the fuck-you-I-got-mine culture (NIMBYs) that use the courts disingenuinly.

          A good listen that explains a lot of the reasons is The Big Dig, about Bostons huge infrastructure debacle.

    • xeekei@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m gonna be “that guy” for a bit and say that I was never into him even back when everyone loved him.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whatever you think about China, you gotta give them some credit for their public transport. Right now, China’s total metro system length is almost equal to the rest of the world combined.

    • China: 11003.004 km (6,855.591 mi)
    • Rest of world: 12632.24 km (7,847.44 mi)

    Furthermore, out of 12 longest metro systems in the world, 11 are in China. The remaining one is in Russia. Just crazy numbers.

    This is probably unachievable in Western countries, since they expect the metro systems to make a profit, which makes no sense whatsoever. Some don’t, of course, and they, too, have respectable subway configurations.

    Source: Wikipedia | List of metro systems

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is probably unachievable in Western countries, since they expect the metro systems to make a profit, which makes no sense whatsoever.

      It’s the difference between making profit

      • Widening gulf between price and cost, then pocketing the difference

      And value

      • Widening the gulf between cost and utility, then increasing the overall value of the economic system

      Businesses are absolutely profiting off Chinese HSR. They just aren’t the rail network operators. They’re the operator’s clients.

      Incidentally, America does have comparable systems. We just do it for cars and planes, not trains

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      i have many issues with the ethics and morals that comprise the current chinese dynasty. but they are extraordinarily rational when it comes to the great imperial forces of the world. it costs a government less, long term, to implement big public works projects. the technology for high speed rail will reduce traffic jams, reduce infrastructure maintenance costs, and boost the economy but it will take 30 years to bear fruit? china will do that because it’s cheaper.

      meanwhile here everything is analyzed and implemented in 2 year increments. it’s unsustainable

      • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do you direct those same ethics and morals that you claim to have towards the US or not? Otherwise your point is useless.

            • untorquer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              The good within a border never justifies the evil inherent in its maintenance, at least not in the long run.

              Though both of your example are invaders so 🤷

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Imperialistic was what I was going for, both of which are prime examples of their eras version. Don’t be fooled by pretty language China and the US are beth imperial powers and both deserve to be sent to the dustbin of history.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          “hey, this guy said all empires suck but that of the empires china is the most well run. let me just assume he doesn’t criticize or try to dissolve the empire he directly suffers under”

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The USA effectively does not perform governance in the sense that is meant by liberal democracies of the last century. That’s just not what the USA does, and it doesn’t make sense to compare it to a government that exists to serve its citizens.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yes, serving citizens means giving millions in subsidies to billionaires for a scam that would only serve the upper class if it were even real.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Just to be clear, the scam that only serves the upper class that you are referring to is… public intercity transit? Have I got that right?

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Hyperloop. It would cost as much as a private jet, considering the kind of maintenance required.

          Now what sort of person could afford to be on a private jet?

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It makes sense in the regard to illustrate that the US. Is lagging behind most other countries. They talk a big game as if they are the best in the world when they’re 50-60 years behind everyone else. To show a comparison for a government that does exist to serve its citizens, as opposed to a government that only claims to serve its citizens.