• ronl2k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Those tiny cars don’t meet American safety standards. And Americans don’t like bottom-of-the-barrel cars at any price.

  • Ininewcrow@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not that they want to … as the economy grows worse for poor people, they will have to use small cars.

    Who the hell can afford a big fat ugly shiny new truck right now? You can’t drive it, you can’t fuel it, you can’t insure it, you can’t park it, you can’t maintain it, you can’t store it … and it’s a liability that is expensive when it breaks and it is more likely to be vandalized or stolen.

    I don’t live in a big city … but I still want a small vehicle because it’s cheaper to fuel, cheaper to operate, can be parked anywhere and they’re easy to fix if broken (and even if they do get damaged, I really don’t care what they look like as long as it still operates) … and no one would want to steal it unless they wanted the scrap metal from it.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      poor people tend to drive huge old cars. they don’t buy new cars.

      i live in a big city and most of my neighbors have mid-full size suvs they part on the street. it’s not an issue. and 50-70K for a new car isn’t much on a professional salary of 150-300K a year.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      please, bring back cars whose engine is just capable of reaching the speed limit, a 70hp engine in a small car is more than enough for the average person. it’ll cost a fraction of a normal American car, and be much cheaper to run and maintain.

      and they are so adorable. seeing a kei car or a delica in the wild makes me happy.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        be much cheaper to run and maintain.

        no one mentions how heavy vehicles use more tires, brakes, transmissions and wear everything faster.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          however big cars cost more and increase so the cost relating to transport. making more money for rich people. that’s why we can’t have nice things

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It won’t really cost much less. The difference between a 1.6l 100hp engine and a 1.6l 150hp engine is just a turbocharger and those are less than $1,000 for an auto maker. So the cost of the car could potentially drop from 28,000 to 27,000 which is peanuts. The cost of maintenance between those two vehicles would be almost non-existent.

        Cars aren’t expensive because of horsepower. They are expensive because of labor cost and government regulation. The less you have of either of those the lower the production cost goes and the less expensive the vehicles get.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          are you telling me, that an American car that weighs 3 tonnes, is only slightly more expensive to buy/run/maintain compared to one that has the same bed size and weights less than a ton?

          an f 350 (American large car) has between 400 to 500 hp, a kei truck has 65hp, the difference isn’t just a turbocharger, it’s an engine small enough you can lift without tools. it’s a third of the materials, a third of fuel consumption, parts are smaller and much cheaper…

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Are we discussing cars or trucks? You use both terms but they are very different things. The article itself is discussing CARS and the very first picture is of a Honda Life.

            In your original comment you said “average American car”. Which to me as an American is clearly a reference to a CAR. And by sales the three most popular CARS in America are the Nissan Sentra, the Toyota Corolla, and the Honda Civic. If you push it to Top 4 then the Tesla Model 3 enters the chat. None of those are called “trucks” anywhere in the world.

            an f 350 (American large car) has between 400 to 500 hp

            That is not a car. It is a Heavy Duty truck, one of the largest behomeths commonly (and I use that term loosely) sold in America. By sales volume the Full Ton and up trucks like the F350 are maybe 20% of total truck sales, the rest are 1/2 and 3/4 ton trucks.

            If you want to bag on American trucks that’s fine but that isn’t what you brought up nor are they what my comment was about.

            I wouldn’t purchase a Kei truck in America. It’s too small to be used for heavy loads or over distance and in the city a small van is superior in literally every way as it’s storage is both lockable and protected from the elements. That Honda Life in the first picture is better for nearly every use case than a Kei truck.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I owned a Ford Festiva, made by Kia, in the 90s. But at that point, I had a fully developed penis and did not need a truck. The 4 doors were for the excess women this attacted.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Loved those back in the day but they were not safe and a lot of people died in them. There’s no chance that car would pass today’s crash tests.

        I had a serious fetish for Ford EXPs and Escorts in the late 80s / early 90s. Me and my buddies did lots of hop-up work and engine rebuilds. Set aside the nostalgia though and they were absolute piles of crap.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s not actually true. They got a below average safety rating for impacts on pedestrians.

  • JordanZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I drive a manual Miata. I’d absolutely love an Autozam AZ-1 (Autozam is a Mazda brand). I also ride motorcycles. The Miata is actually harder to use than the motorcycles in American traffic due to its height. If you want to turn and a truck/SUV pulls up on your side you’re just stuck staring right at the middle of their door panel, zero visibility. On the motorcycles my head is at least high enough to see through their windows. Obviously this wouldn’t be an issue if the other driver didn’t pull forward to the absolute limit but that next to never happens.

    For reference:

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    What, a cheap car that is perfect for commutes and milk-runs, gets stellar mileage, zero unnecessary frills, with no over-engineered electronic crap? I can’t even get a new car w/o a crappy electronic center console if I throw money at the dealership. Who cares if it’s like driving a mail truck: sign us up!

    Many of us want these, but cannot obtain them new or even register them in our home state(s).

    That said, ending the Chicken Tax might turn companies like Ford inside-out in the process. It’s an economic Jenga tower of automotive suck over here.

  • jaschen306@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Never.

    While not in Japan, I live in Taiwan and we have some Japanese imported Kei cars.

    The majority of Taiwan driving is city. We don’t have many highways.

    In Japan and Taiwan, esp in the city, the average speed is like 35mph. Even on the highway, most cars are not driving faster than 55mph.

    In some parts America, it’s mostly highway driving. Those Kei cars are death traps.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Most Americans aren’t like me, but I love my Smart car. I got into it late, I thought the cars were really goofy and stupid when they hit the scene. It’s now my favorite car of all that I’ve owned, including my previous Porsche Boxter S. The Smart car was $6k used, it costs a little over $20 to fill up with gas, the 6 gallon tank takes just under a minute. It’s still a manual which I love and it’s so easy to drive. There is no extended hood so you never worry about scraping things when turning. The turning radius is insane by the way; the wheels turn to almost 90 degrees. I only need 1.5 lanes to make a U-turn and the power steering and clutch is very light. It also goes plenty fast which I was concerned about, I don’t feel scared driving on the highway in it at all. It really doesn’t feel small when you’re in it until you look behind and remember that the car just ends as far as your arm can reach. Smarts are made by Mercedes so they’re good quality. It’s a shame they were discontinued in the US, but I’m not surprised at all.

    • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This all sounds amazing… Except having no rear. I was rear ended by a drunk driver and was able to walk away (relatively) unharmed because my trunk was a massive crumple zone able to soak up all the energy.

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They surprisingly have high safety ratings. There is a trunk, it even opens like a standard truck, it’s just not very big. The frame doesn’t get crushed, but the car is very light and I’m sure the force of an impact can still cause a lot of damage, or of course the car is more easily pushed into places it shouldn’t go in a crash because it’s so light.

  • rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why leave it to car brains to determine if they like it? The people driving F350 GMC Yukon zero visibility death machines will never. Too bad.

    Regulate the size of cars and stop pedestrian/biker deaths.

    • phaedrus@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Regulate the size of cars and stop pedestrian/biker deaths.

      I think that’s the point of the USA, though. You’re not allowed to indulge in nature, only industry.