• fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can barely follow and absorb anything at 1.5-2x.

    Beyond that, more power to you.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, 2x is normally my limit, sometimes 2.5x. Very occasionally there will be content that gets 3x or more, but it’s incredibly rare. It has to be something pretty slow.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some lectures and instruction videos are only watchable at 4x or higher.

      Luckily there’s extensions and alternative apps that provide a much better user experience than the default one, including being able to increase playback speed as much as you want.

      • knexcar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Speeds over 2x were never a free feature, they just used to not be an option at all.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    You can use yt-dlp to download it and play it in whatever movie player you want that supports variable speeds, unless and until YouTube cracks down on downloading.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I use jdownloader2. I think it uses yt-dl on the backend though? Like the original yt-dl. I’m not sure.

      I was curious so I downloaded the Mac version of yt-dlp (as I am on Mac), couldn’t get it to run. And I’m comfortable with the command line.

      YouTube kinda is cracking down on downloading though. If a video is marked as adult (you need to sign in to view it), it can’t be downloaded. A lot of “official videos” (like trailers from the studio) can’t be downloaded. Subtitles can’t be downloaded. That’s in jd2. Not sure about yt-dlp.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think it uses yt-dl on the backend though? Like the original yt-dl.

        You’re probably thinking of youtube-dl. I’d guess that it most-likely used that at one point, but probably switched to yt-dlp when YouTube started throttling single-stream downloads.

      • Koarnine@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yt-dlp all those work, though you may need log in (cookie) for ‘adult’ content

        But i dl with subtitles every time ‘–write-auto-subs’ or ‘–write-subs en’ or ‘all’, also got ‘–convert-subs srt’ yt-dlp the goat

  • ygurin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah Google has been “toll-bridging” features into paid-premium since removal of ability to pause with screen off in YouTube.

    I wouldnt be surprised if corporate greed forces them to remove pausing videos altogether. Not premium can’t pause!

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Then it’ll become a premium feature to choose your videos otherwise you’ll have to consult a personalised video guide to see when the videos you want to watch will be playing.

    • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      corporate greed

      There’s no way YouTube is even remotely profitable even with the massive amounts of ads on the free version…

      • SippyCup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They’re almost certainly one of the more profitable Google services or they’d have been cut loose by now.

        Google serves ads, YouTube is a great platform for them to serve ads, and they don’t even have to pay content creators that much, because they serve their own ads. The biggest expense is probably bandwidth and memory, which Google owns enough of to sell off bits they aren’t using.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This is why I am just going to pay networks of my favorite youtubers directly when YouTube finally gets too bad to use. I’m never paying for RedTube or whatever the fuck porny ass name their premium service has so that Google gets most of my money and Mr beast gets a cut while the people I actually watch get nothing. I pay for Dropout already and that shit is so much better than Netflix and other services. Sure it’s low budget but it’s still better than the slop all the big companies are shoveling out of their troughs.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I don’t care when my only way to watch YouTube it’s either:

      • on Firefox with uBlock Origin
      • on ReVanced
      • on SmartTube (for Android TV)
      • by downloading the video through yt-dlp
  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am at the point where you tube is now a rare choice. I am tired of the stupid games and adblock and trying to not log in.

    Fuck it, I can do without.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not OP but informational podcast/interview type videos that are heavy on talking and long I watch at 2.25x with subtitles on.

      • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Interesting, I do 1.5x for certain podcasts and tabletop like Critical Role, but even at that speed I miss things and lose comprehension (although I am usually multitasking as well)

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Makes sense, in other contexts I’d watch at lower speeds (I watch starcraft games sometimes at 1.25x), but for me this is kind of like the video equivalent of skimming an article, actively reading and listening at the same time and not multitasking. I also manually skip around to get to relevant information faster.

          I’d also like to mention that I’m able to do this because I use FreeTube, not because I pay for YouTube…

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For me personally, until a month ago I had no idea why people would prefer to watch at faster speed.

      Then I was assigned 10 hours of training at work, and it was all the worst fucking videos you’ve ever seen, no editing for clarity or brevity, points being repeated ad nausea. Repeating footage. And it’s not like I could skip vast portions of it, I never knew when a little piece of key information would be snuck in which was in the knowledge test.

      Finally said to myself fuck this and I put it on 2x. I found it kind of life-changing in that moment and I’m going to consider using faster watch speeds from now on.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ive experienced that too :) These companies that make training videos for employees, seems like anyone could succeed there. Literally no quality, but thats fine, the manager gets his checkbox checked, all employees trained.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lol nope, out of principle I will never pay for this even if I didn’t already hate Google.

    It feels so condescending to the user, so unconcerned with their agency that I could never bring myself to support this choice with even a tiny amount of money.

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same here. I’m sick of seeing people say stuff like “just pay for Premium bro”. Stfu. That’s like paying the mafia for “protection” from them. YouTube created these problems and now I have to pay them to fix it? Fuck no.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      100% agree. The problem is that there are more and more features that get tugged behind the subscription paywall

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would give anything to skim an article rather than sit through a 10 minute video for the one thing I need to know.

        • Koarnine@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Use the transcript and skip/read through

          It’s on every youtube video at the bottom of the description!

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I watch most IT/Technical videos at 1.5-2x speed. Especially tutorial style videos. Most creators use a very long and drawn out way of speaking in order to keep the viewer on the same page, but most of the time I know the core concepts already, so I don’t need the super detailed parts only the barebones.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      This was a video of a machine treating pomegranate seeds 🤷 don’t ask

      But it was filmed in a lot of detail and there was no need to watch the whole thing. The creators should probably have made a highlights video instead.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s what I wanted to know. Until I realised I don’t care how people watch YouTube and that it’s more annoying to me that Google is paywalling something that costs them nothing to implement.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t know what YouTube does when you increase playback speed, but a lot of people who listen to podcast-type material or lectures will use software that has the ability to time-stretch the playback without changing the pitch. That is, we can often understand people perfectly well speaking more quickly than they actually do.

      I imagine that some people are most-likely looking at content of that sort on YouTube.

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Listening to people talk faster gives me anxiety. It’s the closest thing (I guess) to feeling like I have ADHD. Like I’ve done a bunch of speed but without any of the dopaminergic effects.

        I don’t know how anybody does it to be quite honest. Even putting a podcast on 1.25x is too much. It’s like I know they are talking faster than they should and it makes me feel cracked out.