• stebator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Many users were buying OpenPlus Pro smartphones solely because of the ability to unlock the bootloader and flash custom ROMs. People value freedom and customization. OpenPlus is shooting itself in the foot.

    • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Oppo killed and ate OP a long time ago. They’ve just been wearing their skin like a suit up to this point, but their true nature is obvious at this point.

        • raldone01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I also went with a pixel 6a with grafeneos because there are no other good options for me.

          I would have preferred fairphone 6 + calyx but that is on hiatus and I couldn’t wait longer.

        • festus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Sadly, at least in the North American market, Google’s Pixel phones are basically the last good phones you can reliably install your own ROM on.

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      An increasingly small amount of their userbase cares about that now, its a mainstream device now

  • hornedfiend@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    One plus joined my short list of “I can’t be bothered” companies like Samsung and Apple, Xiaomi, Oppo and some other sub par companies.

    • ragas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      And all that while OnePlus was awesome up until the OnePlus 7 pro.

      I had the 5t until last year and it was still awesome.

  • gaymer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Gone are the days when oneplus used to be consumer friendly company. The parent company CEO is taking advice from some wannabe Elon musk. All these people who say they understand business but have no understanding of technical knowhow shouldn’t be allowed to become business leaders but the world we live in is becoming a shithole because the bootlickers are being given these top roles.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      OnePlus was never a consumer friendly company. People only liked it because their phones were cheaper than the standard market prices, however, most people understood that this price comes with the caveat that their device is designed, manufactured, and controlled by a Chinese company. Everybody knew that the CCP had their tentacles in these devices, and so it was only a matter of time before things like this start happening.

      • gaymer@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I would happily give my data to CCP than American companies.

        I spend my money on products which are European and Asian. I completely avoid American products and services like a plague.🤢🤢🤮

        • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Now who’s good bootlicker? Yes, you are! Want to bend over and give me paw?

          While you keep deepthroating the boot of an evil regime, I, on the other hand, refuse to give my data to any government or corporation and I do my damnest to make sure my data stays secure.

          • gaymer@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Lol do you even know what bootlicking means ? Its my choice to buy and use Europeans and Asian products.

            But I like your narrative how you’re trying to make American good. Chinese bad.

            Fuck off !! CIA , ICE cunts.

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      what has happened, indeed. I still use an 8T and I love it heavily, but good lord. apparently you miss a few models and the whole company changes.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    24 hours ago

    so it basically permanently “damages” the phone when you try to root it, seems like they are asking for a lawsuit at some point.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Why would they start with the harder one? Samsung is much better funded, and therefore will be a much more difficult case.

        And no, it does not matter that Samsung did it first.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I thought the difference there is that they were upfront about the feature in Knox and you can still install another OS, it just disables Pay and the Secure Notes part. Also it was something there from the start.

        This feels markedly different as it’s retroactive and a full brick, which is much more severe and a bait and switch.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          My last contact with it was on my Samsung S8. I was not aware of any “For your security we will monitor for OS changes” communication

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I personally never trusted Chinese phone no matter how good they were.

      Ironically, the best phones for security and privacy are Google’s Pixel phones because they’re the only ones that GrapheneOS supports

  • lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Seriously are there any Android brands that do not suck and ship everywhere (not limited to the US/EU markets)??

    • eru@mouse.chitanda.moe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      google pixel with grapheneos maybe

      pixel 10 is pretty repairable hardware wise, some prior ones have glued in battery

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I believe thay all have shitty operating systems. But some of them have an aftermarket OS available. Pick your OS first, then look for a phone that can run it. Here are the ones I know of:

      GrapheneOS

      CalyxOS (on hiatus)

      Crdriod

      LineageOS

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    And yet my LinkedIn is still full of people complaining about how much the EU over-regulates

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    So never buy OnePlus products. Got it. Thanks OnePlus for making the advice so clear!

      • Armand1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        81
        ·
        1 day ago

        Samsung has been blowing fuses in your phone when you root since at least 2015. I know because it happened to me. Never bought one again after that.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Samsung just does it to trigger Knox and not let you use some security minded things on the phone.

          They also, however, have their phones pretty much impossible to root anymore. I don’t think most ever get a custom rom, because pretty much no one can get a Samsung phone to except one. I believe my old Note 20 Ultra is still not rootable.

          • Armand1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            For me I found out when I wanted them to fix something and they refused to honour the warranty because of the blown fuse.

            As far as I know, this is illegal, btw. They have to prove that the error you are reporting is caused by user action. If your battery craps out, they can’t blame it on you rooting your phone.

          • SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d love to put a custom OS on mine, even if it tripped the Knox fuse (which disables the Samsung Pay NFC option). The issue I have is that no CFW allows / guarantees compatible VoLTE…and without that, phones don’t really work on Australian networks. Have to have 4G + white listed VoLTE.

            Its a mess down here.

            Ironically, my Duoquin F21 pro works perfectly. How they got white listed I have no idea

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yep, Samsung Knox is the feature name; does it actually prevent things or is it just “tamper evidence” for corporate devices?

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s the blanket name for their security architecture. The thing that makes sure your kernel is blessed, tries teo tell if you’re rooted, then sets a fuse flag if anything is off. It also provides a secure, encrypted profile for your phone that bifurcates apps, data, blocks screenshots. The data from the flag is available to apps to tell that your phone is potentially insecure. For the most part, they only block Samsung banking/pay apps and make your secure partition inaccessible.

            My next phone will be something degoogled. hopefully something linux.

            I’ve already wiped an old disconnected android phone for use with my drone/cameras that require a mobile device.

          • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            According to the linked article it prevents the use of Samsung Pay and access to the Secure Folder (an extra layer of security you can enable that requires a second PIN to be input before you can access certain apps and files). This seems pretty reasonable, the goal is clearly to prevent access to especially sensitive data if someone has stolen the phone.

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s not reasonable in my opinion.

              I can maybe understand not wanting other operating systems in their attestation chain that is protecting a payment system from the standpoint of liability.

              All of the other things are entirely hardware features that any OS should be able to use. They’re using the ARM Trusted Execution Environment (ARM TrustZone) and a embedded Secure Element to enable the ability to store cryptographiclly secured files without the system ever having access to the keys.

              Both TEEs and eSEs are not a Samsung invention or IP and are enabled by hardware on the device, the TEE is part of the ARM standard and is used in a huge number of other OSs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture_family). Secure Elements are also widely used pieces of hardware supported by innumerable OSs and also a feature of the hardware that you paid for.

              • PhoenixAlpha@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                1 day ago

                GrapheneOS also claims it’s not defending against anything real. Which makes sense as Pixels can clearly maintain security while allowing alternate OSes. So this is just hostile vendor lock-in. Disappointing as there was some speculation that OP would be the GOS OEM, but there’s no way they would do this is that was true.

                • njordomir@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Sad. Having used the OPX, OP6T, OP9, and briefly the OP10, I can honestly say their hardware is usually pretty good. I went to Graphene on a Pixel for the software. Software was always Oneplus’ weak point so it’s extra silly that they’re doing this. So many hobbyists have bought OP hardware and used it with software of their choice. They started co-developing their Oxygen OS with Oppo a while back and that’s when it really went to hell.

              • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                That makes sense. I figured they were worried that an alternate OS would be more likely to exploit their encryption somehow, but if it’s all using industry standard hardware then it really ought to be open.