• Joeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah there was a time when winrar was basically the best option for zip files it made it easy…

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Yeah, but it was a poster child for nagware. Edit to be fair so did WinRAR, but that sweet sweet compression and multi-volume splitting made it the best tool for those sailing a jolly roger on those slow, stormy seas…

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I don’t really have an issue with nagware. You got a powerful, useful piece of software for free. I’m starting to see a lot of comments in this vein on Lemmy. Open Source is fantastic, but it’s also okay to want to get paid for the time and effort put into something.

            • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              What you’re seeing on Lemmy is up to you.

              What I’m talking about is late 90s and early 00s, with WinZip being the prime example but others like ACDSee or even mIRC also coming to mind, where the whole shareware model for the era was companies testing out just how inconvenient they could be and still get the users to buy their apps.

              The glorious counterpoint to this was WinAmp, who not only whipped the lama’s ass, but was also free (for non-comercial use) shareware and users paid voluntarily, which I gladly would have if I wasn’t a broke kid at the time.

              This era died off completely after that, as the internet became more accessible, open source and libre licenses exploded, and many apps migrated to web browsers.