Okay, first: LLMs are not the arbiters of some objective truth. They’re at best deliberately unreliable arbiters of the opinions reflected in the dataset upon which they were trained. Second: I’m not particularly interested in that synthesized dubious opinion as constrained by a false dilemma that presupposes that one party or the other will have to be eradicated as part of any proposed solution. Abandon all human decency, ye who enter here.
Israel is genocidal, the Palestinian people repeatedly voted for peace and to live side-by-side with Israel until it became clear that Israel refuses to make that an option.
Take that matter up with Bibi’s regime and Hamas. I’m talking about over-reliance on the output of LLMs and framing of the prompts given to them here, nothing else.
Okay, first: LLMs are not the arbiters of some objective truth. They’re at best deliberately unreliable arbiters of the opinions reflected in the dataset upon which they were trained. Second: I’m not particularly interested in that synthesized dubious opinion as constrained by a false dilemma that presupposes that one party or the other will have to be eradicated as part of any proposed solution. Abandon all human decency, ye who enter here.
Israel is genocidal, the Palestinian people repeatedly voted for peace and to live side-by-side with Israel until it became clear that Israel refuses to make that an option.
The state of Israel is genocidal, just like America, just like Britain, Canada, all colonial countries.
The solution would be dissolving the state, not killing the citizens.
I know you did not mean killing the people but the comment you’re replying to was talking about that kind of solution.
Take that matter up with Bibi’s regime and Hamas. I’m talking about over-reliance on the output of LLMs and framing of the prompts given to them here, nothing else.