Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.
Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.
@PerfectDark@lemmy.world
That’s interesting, I know Mathieu a bit, I’ll check in with him. But from his Mastodon posts recently, this is just how things are with Lutris now.
I appreciate the tag!
Looks like this has been picking up a lot of steam, no pun intended. Since this was posted yesterday I’ve seen it trending on Mastodon and now it’s being covered by GamingOnLinux.
Seems like using Claude AI to code is counter to his previous viewpoint. Not that people’s opinions can’t change.
"The community has a tendency to push for the adoption of newer technologies while I have a tendency to hold back a bit before we adopt anything new. Some people use lutris on quite outdated systems and we try not breaking anything until a distribution gets really old. Finding the right balance is quite an art but the community helps in knowing what is needed and which systems can be dropped.”