Agency says its reporter wasn’t allowed into event in effort to ‘punish’ style guide on upholding use of Gulf of Mexico
  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catEnglish
    301·
    10 个月前

    Good. Get punished. Don’t go along with it. If you start bowing and scraping so you won’t get ejected from the oval office, then that will enable that much more the gradual evolution that will lead you along with many other people to get “punished” in ways that are far more severe. Like, barges floating off of Gitmo or working in the fields on a prison labor system severe. It is insane to me that people are taking all of this so lightly and going along with it.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1541·
      10 个月前

      Even from the ideal pro-capitalist hat on; AP benefits from this. It might seem that short term they lose money by not having hot off the press news to sell, but long term they keep their credibility, which is ultimately the product they sell.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.worldEnglish
      595·
      10 个月前

      More respect for the AP? Them and Reuters are the two defacto news orgs that 95% of other news get their articles from lmfao.

      • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.worldEnglish
        201·
        10 个月前

        I love AP, too. Even Reuters can get a little eyebrow-raising sometimes, but I find AP pretty consistently solid. They’re straight-up targeting the actual, real-deal journalists. ProPublica’s likely to be fucked with, too.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        5·
        10 个月前

        But I was assured by all the vocal defenders of that stupid bias bot that fiiiiiinally went away (payments must have dried up) that the AP and Reuters are left-wing rags.

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.eeEnglish
      24·
      10 个月前

      Not even deadnamed. The “name change” only impacts like a specific section of it, not the whole thing.

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    43·
    10 个月前

    Blocking the press is how the Trump admin can they make this absurd distraction a much bigger deal with no repercussions. The power of names is much diminished in these times. We need a better name vibe. call it Gulf of Slow The Fuck Down

  • samus12345@lemm.eeEnglish
    404·
    10 个月前

    Any press still allowed in is just bootlicking government mouthpieces anyway.

  • adarza@lemmy.caEnglish
    321·
    10 个月前

    toss another lawsuit on the fire in 4… 3… 2… 1…

  • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    10 个月前

    I know of at least one US government web page that still references “Gulf of Mexico”, but I don’t want to link it, because I’m very curious to see how long it can fly under the radar. I have a thing set up that checks the page regularly and will alert me whenever it changes.

    Is there a way to set up archive.org or something like that to save regular snapshots without risking drawing more attention to it?

  • miscellanii@lemm.eeEnglish
    21·
    10 个月前

    Interesting to note that they’re standing firm on Gulf of Mexico but not Denali.

    • adarza@lemmy.caEnglish
      30·
      10 个月前

      one is an international body of water, the other is wholly contained within the borders of the u.s. that’s why they went that route.

    • BossDj@lemm.eeEnglish
      2·
      10 个月前

      Side note: everyone called it Denali before Obama renamed it anyway, and everyone is doing to continue to call it Denali

  • JackbyDev@programming.devEnglish
    191·
    10 个月前

    I hate news articles so much. “The (underlined) Associated Press said” ahh, this must be a link to the actual quote, I’ll read that. Nope! Just a link to their website. At least it’s not as bad as other sites that link to other random articles.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      2·
      10 个月前

      The worst are the outlets that appear to outright refuse to link to anything but their own site… It will reference something, and instead of the link actually going to the thing, it goes to the last article they posted on the thing. Ugh. Few things make me leave a news site faster.