One that comes to mind for me: “Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger” is not always true. Maybe even only half the time! Are there any phrases you tend to hear and shake your head at?

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not a fan of “it is what it is”. It’s called a thought-terminating cliche. It often means “I’m tired of talking about this, do it my way” when my boss says it.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve always liked it. I guess it depends who is saying it because when my old boss said it, it meant more like, “this is the situation we’re in, let’s not waste time arguing about why it is the situation and let’s just focus on dealing with it and going forward”

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      ,I feel like this one is context dependent. Sometimes it’s just acceptance of the situation.

      “Wish it weren’t so hot outside, but this is Texas in August. It is what it is.”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      “Agree to disagree” is even worse, especially since often the thing you’re arguing about is an empirical goddamn fact and they are not entitled to “disagree” about it. That’s not having a difference of opinion; that’s just fucking being wrong!

    • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I use it when people keep complaining about situations they cannot change. Yes, we fell in the hole, yes it hurt, please just let’s focus on how to get out.

      “Ah fuck, this hole sucks! Who even dug that here!? My shoes are dirty, my pants are a mess!” …

      “Well… It is what it is. Let’s get out.”

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I like it. It’s premise is accepting things beyond your control, allowing someone to stoically move forward rather than dwell in anxiety and disbelief.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Ooo I get that one, but kinda the opposite way. I tell someone it has to be done this way, or to a certain standard, for it to be right. They don’t want to, so they respond with that nonsense.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree, when it’s used as a thought-terminating cliché. It’s also very applicable to impart acceptance of something that you can’t control.

      • mmhmm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I used it today to communicate my feelings on a topic I can’t control. Like, me venting isnt going to improve my or the questioners situation.

        In principal I am against thought-termination. Sometimes, like a good dog, you gotta put a thought out of its misery

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I use it more in acceptance, like if I’m late for work and I hit traffic. Short of driving up the shoulder like an asshole, I’m going to be late. So rather than be stressed for the rest of my commute, I just accept that I’ll be late. It is what it is.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Interesting. I use it to indicate I may not like a situation, but I have to play the have I was dealt to the best of my ability, and sometimes… Well to quote lyrics, “got to know when to hold cem, know when to fold 'em, know when to walk away, know when to run.”

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s good for when talking about things beyond your control. They way your boss is using it is bullshit. In that case, it is what he’s choosing to decide it is.

  • lady_maria@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Everything happens for a reason .”

    No. Fuck no, and fuck you. I DARE you to say that to the faces of the endless innocent people—many of whom are CHILDREN—who have been murdered, tortured, abused, enslaved, raped, ect.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate how people use this but not the phrase itself.

      Everything DOES happen for a reason. It’s literal, precise, and accurate. Reasons dont need to be mysterious, aloof, or unknowable. They often are because we choose to stop learning but everything does happen for a reason so start looking for better questions

      • Enkrod@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The reasons just don’t necessarily come with any moral take away attached.

        Children get bone cancer for purely physical reasons, yes, but there is no plan behind it, nothing that makes the situation better in any way and this is how the phrase is usually being used. It’s people saying: “Don’t be sad, something good will come of it.” to the faces of grieving parents or deathly ill people who have nothing to look forward to but pain.

        Religious/spiritual proselytising has completely alienated the phrase from the methodological naturalism it could express.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Children get bone cancer for purely physical reasons, yes, but there is no plan behind it, nothing that makes the situation better in any way and this is how the phrase is usually being used

          My exact point. Im glad you agree with me

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      All those innocent people being abused usually have a reason behind it too; it’s just that the reason is usually corporate greed and a lack of ethics in politics.

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, everything does happen for a reason. It’s just that most of the time, the reason is “because so-and-so is an asshole”. It makes it essentially a useless platitude, but not an untrue one. I definitely take issue with the implication of it, that there’s some supreme, all-knowing authority in the universe who has this complicated, labyrinthine plan for everyone that involves massive amounts of suffering. That whole “mysterious plan of God” thing is a way for Christians to take credit for all of the good stuff that happens, while downplaying all of the bad stuff that happens as just “part of God’s plan!” It’s insidious.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Second time I’m bringing it up in this thread, but in response to exactly that kind of thinking is why I’ve adopted “the universe doesn’t care, so we have to” as a phrase I try to live by.

      There are so many popular ways of thinking that absolve humans and humanity of various kinds of responsibility.

      It’s not good.

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      My preferred response to this is, “Entropy. The eventually and unstoppable heat death of the universe where none of this matters is the reason.”

    • grepe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think I get the sentiment that you are angry at but there is nothing wrong with that statement. It just doesn’t mean “whelp, there must be some higher purpose those things are serving that we don’t see” and is more like “there are some awful people doing bad things” or “they just were living in a seismic area” or “they had some genes not compatible with their survival”… There are always reasons. Not satisfying or purpose fulfilling reasons, just reasons.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I used to say this when I was a cringy 20-year-old, before I really saw and understood the world (and still believed in a god).

  • november@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Grow up and live in the real world” / “Life’s not fair” / other thought-terminating cliches used to shut down anyone who wants the world to be a better place than it is. Like, I fucking know it’s an unfair place. The whole point is that I would like for it to be less unfair.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I got told “life isn’t fair” so many times growing up, I came up with a default comeback: “Doesn’t mean you have to be.”

      A version of it has grown to became my tenet in life: “The universe doesn’t care, so we have to.”

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        life isn’t fair

        It’s not as pithy, but I think “Just because you didn’t get your way, doesn’t mean it’s unfair” would be a better sentiment for adults to tell children.

        Or “I don’t fucking care what happened, I just don’t want to hear you whine about it”. Hardly an acceptable way to talk to children, but I think it’s what adults in my life meant when I was a child.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        When someone who’s trying to exploit me says that, I literally just beat the hell out of them to remind them how right they are and that their means of dominance isn’t the only one. Real world strikes again! This time it’s the reason we have manners!

    • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate how “well life is just not fair” shuts down so many very much needed discussions.

      That being said, I say that a lot, especially to myself whenever someone, again, including myself, is being intolerable brat who thinks they deserve fairness. No, that’s not how world works.

      Funny thing is that those kind of people tend to not care about other people’s struggle or fairness.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        is being intolerable brat who thinks they deserve fairness

        Why do you think anyone does not deserve to be treated fairly?

        • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I believe treating people fairly, obviously.

          But you’ll have hard times that don’t seem so fair; car accident, illness… What I meant by people not deserving fairness is for that kind of things

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I actually am guilty of using that when people try to tell me “there’s someone out there for everyone.” Or “don’t worry, you’ll find someone who loves you for you.”

      Like no? Life isn’t fair, there’s no guarantee of anything.

      To your point I agree though, discussing what we’d like to improve is important.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        “You’ll find someone who loves you for you,” is totally true, as long as you are also continuously lowering your standards until you find them.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Life isn’t fair” always bothered me, even as a kid, because it was used against me to dismiss unjust actions.

      Saying something isn’t fair is basically saying it’s not right, it’s not just.

      Trying to claim the injustice against me is moot or unimportant just because there’s lots of injustice in the world, seems bonkers to me.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s an accurate statement. Life isn’t fair, or right, or just. However, it ignores the fact that we as humans can choose to try to make it those things.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s true though. Saying this is not necessarily meant to be the end of a discussion.

      • november@lemmy.vg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Everyone knows that, though. So what’s the point of saying it when someone is trying to make things more fair?

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Because saying things, even if they are known, is a thing humans do for various reasons. It seems that sometimes they need to be reminded simple truth.

          • november@lemmy.vg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nah. Someone lamenting that the world is unfair and needs to change does not need to be reminded that the world is unfair.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    "Pull up by the bootstraps"aka bootstrapping was a phrase originally coined to mean something being literally impossible and is now used as a tool to shame the poor for not overcoming nearly impossible social barriers.

    “That’s just how they are” is always used to excuse bullies for being bullies.

  • Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “He/she just tells it like it is” No, they are just saying things that resonate with you, but have no actual alignment with data, facts or morality. Simply saying things with no filter doesn’t equal “like it is”. I find it is usually attributed to, at best, oversimplified or completely ignorant statements, at worst, misleading and/or hateful statements.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      “they say racist things and i like that because people don’t like it when i say it. this way i can be racist but outsource the messaging”

      good for other kinds of bigotry and douchebaggery

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      You just reminded me of this

      Those who champion “brutal honesty” are more interested in the brutality than the honest

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it depends on the context. If we have an expert on a topic who tries to use some form of simplified Modell and direct speach to make his knowledge more understandable for everyone it is true. Even tho it may be simplified it still contains the most important parts.

  • BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Unused ram is wasted ram. Pisses me off to no end. What I do with my ram is my concern, I don’t want you bloating up and using it.

  • Wolfeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 months ago

    In response to gross privacy violations from big companies and governments:

    “If you’ve done nothing wrong, you’ve got nothing to fear.”

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Here’s a great response to that:

      If you’re at a house party and you need to take a shit, do you do it with the door wide open so everyone can see and smell you? Or do you actually understand, when it comes down to it, that there are valid reasons for wanting privacy other than wanting to get away with something wrong or illegal?

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      I see it like a special move.

      Like I’m interjecting/interrupting.

      So like “Quick question attack! Where did you get that pie?”

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I try to only use that when it’s information I expect the person already knows and can answer quickly (i.e. generally very concrete yes/no questions of low complexity)

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I use it in contexts where if they know the answer offhand, great please help, but if they don’t know, I’m not requesting they spend time or effort looking it up. I can do that myself and don’t intend to offload that part.

        It’s like a short answer question on a quiz rather than a research paper term assignment, except leaving the answer blank on the quiz is an acceptable answer.

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I use this, and I struggle a little to disengage when the person I ask interprets it as “help me figure out how to solve this” when they don’t actually have the “short answer”.

  • dumbass@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    “lets agree to disagree”

    how about fuck you, one of us is wrong and I want to know which one of us that is!

    • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Most people don’t care about what’s true, something that took me forever to realize. Encountering humanity under the assumption that everyone cares about the truth (or any aspect of empirical and normative reality) is bound to be suuuper confusing until you figure things out. People are literally animals (we forget that), and animals are just trying to survive. Some of them are cute or loving. Not all of them are particularly “good,” and even fewer are willing to sacrifice creature comforts in pursuit of some abstract virtues. That’s why Trump gets any votes.

    • Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hmmm, while I see your point on the phrase, my friend group and I only ever use it on subjective things. Like orange juice or chocolate milk being better, for example. If we’re both arguing (in a fun way) and have no good points to change the other’s mind, then we agree to disagree. Haha

    • grepe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      but there is just no right or wrong answer to every question… sometimes it’s just about opinion.

      sometimes these questions are trivial (which color of tie should I wear with this shirt) and sometimes they are literally life and death questions (should death penalty be legal)… and there will always be people with opposing opinions on them. “agreeing to disagree” is literally the best possible thing they can do to live in the same society.

    • itsralC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I find it really useful to shut down discussions where no one is budging and are just overall a big waste of time. As an example, if I’ve been trying to convince someone that the earth is round for 10 minutes and they clearly don’t have any interest in changing their view, I’ll just spare me the trouble and say it. If they still refuse to let it go, I start blindly agreeing with them, that usually does the trick.

  • perishthethought@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sure I’ll get guff for this but, “common sense”. Throughout my youth, when people told me something was common sense, I usually thought they were wrong.

  • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    “it’s just a few bad apples”

    That’s only half the saying. It is used most of the time as if the full thing is “a few bad apples aren’t a problem because the rest are fine” rather than the real thing “a few bad apples spoil the lot.”

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah. I always vehemently agree with the person misusing. “Yes! That’s exactly it. A few bad apples spoil the bunch. Perfectly captures the problem, friend! Good call.”

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      In French, it is actuall “a single apple” spoil the whole thing “une pomme pourrie gâte tout le panier”

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 months ago

    Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you numb and traumatized, not stronger. Big difference.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Whatever doesn’t kill you might make you stronger, but it might also make you weaker. It’s highly dependent on the circumstances.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I liked the quote from Dr. Hibbert on the Simpsons:

        “You know what they say, whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger!”

        “Oh ho ho ho, no… It’s made you weak as a kitten!”

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeaaahhhh Nietzsche was making a very different point about convalescence but of course popular culture bastardized it. If Nietzsche knew that he was going to become an anthem for white girl positivity, he would… well, he’d probably gloat because he predicted that. But his gloating would look like misery.

      • Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nietzsche and out of context excerpts, you can’t possibly name a better pair.