Mine’s that people who insist on correcting others grammar on internet forums are little shits who peaked in grade six as a teacher’s pet and get off on exerting their “superiority” on others.
Fuck you “less than” is just better than “fewer then.” Think I’m wrong, tell me what these symbols are called “< >” that’s what I thought loser.
I don’t think pineapple belongs on hamburgers either. It tastes okay, but there’s so much extra liquid that it’s like holding a bun full of soup.
You have to grill that pineapple ring for a bit. Slightly less liquid, much sweeter
“It gets better” is an awful statement. You don’t really know that. Bit of a thought terminating cliche for people who still have such a chance.
I’ve got a spicy one.
Despite all the patches and updates, Cyberpunk 2077 is still a meh game. I hate the UI, the RPG combat system with damage numbers, the edgy aesthetic and slang words, the lack of vehicle customisation, and the overall lack of non-mission side activities to do in the world.
The ratio of style to substance is heavily weighted in favour of style.
I’ve been complaining about the cyberpunk genre for years and 2077 is basically a distillation of everything wrong with it at current. They use the aesthetic and gut the meat, to the point where they’re often the very things cyberpunk is supposed to be critiquing. Soulless cash grabs its embarrassing we let it happen. 2077 wasn’t even mechanically fun for me. My favorite genre and I feel like we’ve rarely made things better than just reading neuromancer. We should have plenty of really mind blowing rhings with this much time to improve on it but it’s so few and far between 😞
I didn’t dislike it, but it didn’t live up to my hopes after all I’d heard about it.
I don’t regret having bought and played the game, but I never bothered to go back and fully finish all the side missions.
I do think that the edginess is kinda part of the cyberpunk genre. I can’t beat up on them for that.
-
It has high production values, a lot of modeling and texturing and such — I’m amazed how much money they have to have sunk into assets only to use them briefly — but the actual core gameplay didn’t grab me the way, oh, Halo did when it first came out and I played it. Night City is painstakingly created in tremendous detail, but end of the day, the point is to create the backdrop for gameplay, and I feel like they spent a disproportionate making of resources on that.
-
The combat is pretty, but for all of the work that went into various systems, I didn’t play it much differently from the way I would another shooter.
-
I also had been expecting something more like a Bethesda RPG, and got something more Grand Theft Auto-ish with a beefed up skill tree.
-
I wasn’t that impressed with the braindance stuff from a pure gameplay standpoint — it’s kinda “hunt for the hidden object” stuff — but I do think that it was original and it served as a useful justification to show “flashbacks” to earlier events.
-
Obtaining and managing clothing is a significant chunk of game and content, but I almost never actually see the main character, so the clothing doesn’t have much impact. Maybe if there were a third person camera mode or frequent reflections or frequent looking through a camera or something.
-
Having played some games like Saboteur and Grand Theft Auto, I kind of expected the differences between autos to matter more, given how much work went into creating them and all, but from a mission standpoint, they’re surprisingly interchangeable. A couple missions are easier with some, but a lot of the vehicles don’t really have that much gameplay point.
-
Johnny Silverhand is a major part of the game, but wasn’t really a character that I found very plausible or super interesting. I dunno, maybe if I had been into the punk music scene, it’d be different. I felt like they really were trying to shoehorn a punk band leader into the role. That being said, I did think that most characters were pretty solid.
Lots of good points!
ChatGPT-ass emdashes with spaces on either side
(I know there’s three dashes I’m sorry hahaha)
-
People should be able to get suicide assistance. Including healthy people.
We pivoted from social justice causes like child labour to systemic racism (but only in the first world, not where our actual daily racism is practiced) and transphobia etc because the former requires personal sacrifices while the latter mostly “requires” snarky takes on social media.
I can’t help but notice that identity politics stuff ramped up to 11 right as Occupy Wall Street was fizzling out. I really think the alphabet soup agencies unleashed this monster on all of us
If I wanted to ensure the status quo and prevent real change, I cam think of no better sociological judo than getting the progressive Left hooked on identity politics.
We pivoted from real activism to bumper stickers and yard signs and campaign donations to candidates who signalled the right wealthy class social virtues in the 90s and haven’t looked back
Armchair activism. The least you could do – literally.
It’s “hashtag activism” these days, which is a term I really hate.
There is only one struggle and it is the struggle between the excessively wealthy and everyone else.
To the kids who make your clothes, you are excessively wealthy.
Yeah. Not a lot of people in the west are comfortable acknowledging the fact that the life of relative luxury we enjoy is a result of decades to centuries of exploitation of other cultures. We enjoy things like cheap clothing, food and electronics because the people who make these things aren’t being paid a fair amount.
The reality is for people reading this comment, a sustainable future is one where you have less. And to get to that future you have to give things up. That is not a popular opinion and basically makes you unelectable. People love to blame capitalism for always demanding more, but the population at large won’t accept less than they already have. People don’t want to stop eating meat; people don’t want to pay more for clothing or electronics.
Personally, I try to do what I can. I went vegan, I stopped driving, I try to use what I have before I get something new. Globally I have more than average, I’d happily live in a world where the collective wealth of humanity is distributed equally among us all. Even if that means I would personally have less.
Ass is better then tits unless the tits are great then I can handle a Hank Hill ass.
Than*
People who can’t stand being corrected. Instead of learning and improving, they feel diminished and hateful.
Maybe they are just hatefull from the start, and you correcting them puts you in their line of sight?
I’m not really in a position to correct anyone, as English is not my native language.
Knowing the rules and knowing when they’re needed are two different things. A racecar driver doesn’t need to floor it on their way home. Likewise a conversation doesn’t need to employ strict grammatical compliance, we’re talking not drafting a treatise. At the end of the day people who get upset with incorrect grammar do so because it’s an ick or theirs. They then proceed to make that everyone else’s problem. You’re not learned and scholarly for being pedantic.
deleted by creator
Hey, yo! I am superior. Against you anyway.
The Snyder Superman movies were good, actually.
Broooo what the fuxkkkk
Are you lobotomised???
yes
others grammar
others’ grammar
Fixed it for ya!
My hero
The mass noun ‘e-mail’, like ‘mail’, does not get an ‘s’ when speaking about more volume.
It’s as gauche as “y’all” in wedding vows, and leaves a similar impression.
Stay tuned, and we can talk about used-car lot jargon like “the ask” and “the spend” next!
Just thinking about the email one…
I would say one email, two emails… but a lot of email. If it’s an unquantified number then I drop the ‘s’.
My hot take: Thor/PirateSoftware is right about some aspects of Stop Killing Games and the damages it could cause to the games industry. He’s wrong about a lot of it because he clearly has still never properly researched SKG and loves to speak before he thinks, but I do tend to agree with his concerns about the business side of things and how studios will be affected.
Thor/PirateSoftware is right about some aspects of Stop Killing Games and the damages it could cause to the games industry.
For example?
Patching a live service game so that it can run “offline” isn’t a small task, the cost of which will inevitably be pushed onto the players. I feel like SKG sorta trivializes the amount of work that is needed to make this happen when they reference homebrew server emulators for previously-shutdown MMOs, as those custom servers take a LOT of effort from the communities that maintain them.
Publishers of live service games will likely increase the costs of subscription fees/microtransactions in order to fund the necessary conversions once a game reaches end-of-life. This creates a new problem for developers/publishers which, to the best of my knowledge, SKG doesn’t suggest a solution to. I don’t see a scenario in which raising development costs (especially at a time when video games are already more expensive) is beneficial to the industry as a whole.
I don’t think this is a reason to be against SKG as a whole, though. Especially not to the “eat my entire ass” level. But it is a nitpick that I have with it.
Why does the game need to be patched to run offline? Why not just release the server code/binary?
Because the game will still attempt to connect to the real servers, unless otherwise modified.
I think… a URL shouldn’t be that hard to program for. At the laziest, you just let it check for an .ini or something.
I mean, a proper server browser would be nice, but I’d much rather the game just not be shelved permanently.
I feel like that is the absolute bare minimum change that you could do to a game to let it continue to function. Think of all the code changes, bug fixes, optimisations and such that get done in even one patch release. However, the organiser of SKG has released a video debunking all of Thor’s claims, including the idea that it would require live service games to be redeveloped into offline ones. He also doesn’t think it should retroactively apply to existing games. So it would be much easier for a new game to be coded from the start to be able to be disconnected. Here’s the relevant section of his video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HIfRLujXtUo&t=2228s
Legos with stickers suck. They should just print it in the parts or not have a design. It’s too much stress on the person building them :/
Family and blood relation means absolutely nothing.
It’s just that people decided that due to blood relation and marriages a certain set of people should not only know each other, but like each other and put up with each other’s bullshit for far longer than for other groups like friends.
Meanwhile these relations are no different from being coworkers.
Similarly, lacking this blood relation doesn’t matter aside from family anamnesis (and perhaps organ/bone marrow transplants), in case of adoptions.
I don’t understand why people go through so much struggle for their kids to be “their own” while there’s many waiting and hoping to get adopted. People don’t think anything special about adopting a cat or dog, after all, there is no other way, and yet they’ll fully love their pet. But suddenly when it’s small humans, which is even the same specie, it matters a lot.I don’t understand if people really feel something towards having really similar DNA, but I don’t see any logic in it.
Eh, the people you have the strongest emotional bonds with are likely the people you’ve spent the most time with. Logically that would be family for most people. Kinda weird obsession with blood ties their mate, don’t have to be related by blood to be family.
don’t have to be related by blood to be family.
But is family if blood related.
Strongest emotional bonds don’t necessarily mean anything positive. Most time spent only applies to immediate family, like parents. Outside that you likely do spend more time with coworkers or classmates.
Sperm donor kids aren’t all one big family. Family is a social construct.
Yeap.
I’ve written off family members due to toxicity and swore off having kids (before the economy went into the shitter).
Wife also doesn’t want to have kids herself, but loves children. If we want kids I’m going to adopt in a few years. Late 40s early 50s. Aiming to provide a good home and support to one or two in need.
We might start as a foster parents.
