Analysis of broadband affordability deemed “extraneous” by FCC chair.

The Federal Communications Commission is ditching Biden-era standards for measuring progress toward the goal of universal broadband deployment.

The changes will make it easier for the FCC to give the broadband industry a passing grade in an annual progress report. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr’s proposal would give the industry a thumbs-up even if it falls short of 100 percent deployment, eliminate a long-term goal of gigabit broadband speeds, and abandon a new effort to track the affordability of broadband.

Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act requires the FCC to determine whether broadband is being deployed “on a reasonable and timely basis” to all Americans. If the answer is no, the US law says the FCC must “take immediate action to accelerate deployment of such capability by removing barriers to infrastructure investment and by promoting competition in the telecommunications market.”

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      We need a new 4th branch of government that’s in charge of infrastructure and public welfare.

      • ronigami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, we really just need to stop selecting between two bad presidents over and over again. If you always pick the second-worst option, you’re going to have a bad time. Pick the best option. Ranked choice voting is the only way.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        How would this branch be structured? How would it interface with the other branches? How would its members be appointed? What does “Infrastructure and Public Welfare” entail? Why are “Infrastructure” and “Public Welfare” grouped together? What powers would it have to carry out its job, and what specifically is that job? Based on those previous answers, how would it solve any existing or foreseeable issues? Why would it be better positioned to solve those issues than a change made within the existing three-branch framework?

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          And money. Infrastructure is all cost, no profit, no income source, and damn expensive.

          A separate branch only solves the political will half of the infrastructure problem, but we also need a consistent, large budget to actually keep up

          And personally I’d vote to give it all to Amtrak and transit. Every time we add a highway or more lanes to a highway, we’re increasing infrastructure costs that we already can’t afford to keep up with. Why are we still digging this hole deeper?

    • kingofras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s because USA has nukes my friend. The only way your enemies can attack you is through asymmetric warfare, mostly by corrupting your political system so that you attack yourself.

      If you’ve wondered why everything looks like a coup since he got in, perhaps it is because it is one.

      https://lemmy.world/post/31401705

      https://youtu.be/AaKFx5rxdmA

      https://smartelections.us/

      https://electiontruthalliance.org/

      And if you’re wondering why Democrats like Tim Walz are not even interested in investigating it themselves, well, the existence of certain files and whether or not they are disclosed could have something to do with that.

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is the part that bothers me so much about everything that is being dismantled right now. It took forever to get it to where it is, and it still needed a lot of improvement. And it was just smashed seemingly overnight.

        It’s like a sandcastle. Takes forever to build a good one, and it takes some asshole one second to step on it and destroy the whole thing.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          2 months ago

          takes some asshole one second to step on it and destroy the whole thing.

          Absolutely. The last one to just go “lol nah” and demolish the working class this hard was Reagan, and we were still reaping the fallout from those asinine policies when 2016 hit!

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 months ago

            We had never actually fixed any of the shit that Reagan broke. They kept doing more of the same stuff he had started

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The religious right latching on to Reagan as the patron saint of supply-side economics was a serious fucking problem that was completely ignored (and in fact lauded in tons of circles) at the tone. And still is, largely.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          It took forever to get it to where it is, and it still needed a lot of improvement

          It not just took forever to get to where we were but it seems like most of the good things Biden was able to get passed were long term investments. Money spent for something that would help in ten years.

          Now it’s money spent and thrown away.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        82
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah well, clearly it wasn’t fixed fast enough so we should vote back in the people that break everything. Or decide that we shouldn’t vote at all like the lazy sacks of shit we are.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      If only we could chart that and see which political party is in charge at which points, and then never vote for the one that puts us here ever again… Oh well

      • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We can though, first time was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 with funding being released in 2010. D president, D Senate, D house.

        By 2012 it became obvious that the commitment lined out in the 2009 bill weren’t going to happen and a meek attempt to claw back the funds was made. D president, D Senate, R house.

        2021 sees the access broadband act. D president, D Senate, D house.

        By 2025 it became obvious that the commitment lined out in the 2021 bill weren’t going to happen. R president, D R Senate, R house.

        The only constant is a Democratic Senat so clearly that’s the problem! Right?

        Edit: wrong session for 2025 caucus. It’s all Rs there.

          • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            My bad, thanks for catching that I was looking at 118th caucus not 119th. I thought I just misremembered which of those pesky other parties were part of which caucus.

          • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            With the way American politics are at the moment I interpreted that as a “only the Republicans are the bad guys” and wanted to make it abundantly clear that is not the case.

  • Landless2029@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Say it with me people.

    Seperate infrastructure and service!

    If the companies responsible for laying cable and wires weren’t tied to a single brand we’d instantly break the monopolies by town that we currently have. They would also focus on maintaining the infrastructure and growing the network instead of the profits going elsewhere.

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

    Faster broadband is good. Who fucking cares what political party?

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 months ago

      But corporations don’t want to spend money on customers, so they’d rather keep customers on slow speeds and charge the same price.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        so they’d rather keep customers on slow speeds and charge the same price.

        Be fair. The prices go up.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      The wedge is already in place. They just keep pounding on it. This is 100% what happens when corporations and governments become one.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well yeah, we all know it’s good. That’s why Republicans want to take it away.

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s especially funny how Republicans are against regulations because according to them, it stifles progress and innovation. So why are they against regulations that try to force progress and innovation?

      Of course we know why, because it’s all a lie. They just want more money for the 1%. How there is even a single (non-1%'er) idiot left that votes for them is waaaay beyond me.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

      The problem with ignoring politics is that politics is never going to ignore you.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why does everything have to be so fucking political?

      When will people who say shit like this wake the fuck up and realize that life is political?

      Grow up and deal with it like everyone else, fucking cowards.

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      For rural communities to get higher speeds ISPs have to actually use the money the government gives them for increasing rural community internet speeds on increasing rural community internet speeds. If broadband is defined as “one house in the county has access to internet as fast as your grandparents had growing up” then they’ve already met their goal and they don’t need to spend any money and collect pure profit from government subsidies.

      Biden thought that was bullshit and established policy to direct them to do the right thing. The current administration, however, is more than happy taking their checks to the back.

      • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        We should not be giving private entities cash without rigid metrics and timelines. In fact, we should claw back what we’ve given them.

        • unmagical@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          In general I’d agree. Unfortunately, private entities and lobbyists don’t and they’ll pay politicians for the privilege of getting free money at the expense of the rest of us.

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Analysis of broadband affordability deemed “extraneous” by FCC chair.

    The royal court is displeased with matters of the common peasantry

    We will kill the effort with but a word

    We will accept no further pleas for explanation

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thank God we’re also eliminating cheap solar panels from China. Who wants an energy source so unreliable. It literally didn’t even shine for most of the entire time. Sure it’s been lit for just a few million years but whatever are you gonna do when it eventually runs out of helium and hydrogen?

    I’d prefer the new ford trash diesel hybrid…just start the engine on gasoline, switch to diesel, then just dump your trash for that week in the back and wait for the big ass black plume to reduce yo just a healthy soot. It can get 23miles per trashcan!..sorry, 2.3 downhill miles. Isn’t it great? Mr.TrashyBurn!

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    A modem walks into a bar. The bar tender says:

    ‘W’ is 01010111.
    ‘e’ is 01100101.
    ‘l’ is 01101100.
    ‘c’ is 01100011.
    ‘o’ is 01101111.
    ‘m’ is 01101101.
    ‘e’ is 01100101.
    ’ ’ (space) is 00100000.
    ‘t’ is 01110100.
    ‘o’ is 01101111.
    ’ ’ (space) is 00100000.
    ‘A’ is 01000001.
    ‘m’ is 01101101.
    ‘e’ is 01100101.
    ‘r’ is 01110010.
    ‘i’ is 01101001.
    ‘c’ is 01100011.
    ‘a’ is 01100001