• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We’re doing a pretty bang up job of making that one second as stupid and painful as possible.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the main reason why, if you come across a genie in a lamp, you should probably not wish for immortality. You’re gonna be hellafuckin bored for a loooooooong time.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you get the chance, ask for omnipotence or to become conscious energy systems or something. You can still choose to experience being a human and having all these experiences, but you will never be stuck, you will never get bored or feel anything related to being mortal if you don’t want.

      You could even choose to live a whole lifetime. Maybe billions of lifetimes, each one feeling totally and completely indistinguishable from reality, because it would be reality.

      You could be experiencing that right now.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Seriously, even halfway through my expected lifespan and I’m already seeing a point where I’ll be ready to get off the ride. Not in terms of self-harm or depression, but just generally as the decades go on it gets less and less enjoyable in a broad sense.

        Our brains absorb too much information and memories than our minds were meant to handle. Our emotions become an annoying liability. Our memories reveal themselves to be these tenuous and bizarre amalgamations of experiences and imagination and cannot be trusted, and maybe most annoying of all is seeing people making the same mistakes around you all the time, and tuning you out for being “old” more and more, determined to fall into the same holes and traps that could be easily avoided, but dragging all of society with them over and over. It takes away a lot of the magic of seeing the future.

        Even all that would be something manageable, if I had a loooong life I would probably escape from everyone and just read in the woods or something. But holy shit it has to be alongside physical health because by far the worst, worst, worst thing about getting old is the aches and pains and minor irritations that turn into crippling infections, unhealed strains, and degrading senses.

        I am quite positive that something happens after you’re dead for an infinity amount of time, no idea what, but it happened before so it stands to reason it may again, and even the slimmest chances become 100% assured after an infinite amount of time.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why? Are you bored now? If so, why is it a problem? If not, then what’s the problem?

      • Aljernon@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Spending Eternity either crushed to a point in the heart of black hole or drifting thru the darkness of space all alone with nothing to do or even anything to look at.

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      From what I have read on the internet so far, it’s probably best to not wish for anything at all. Just throw it in the deepest ocean to do us all a favour.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fuck that, I will mess with shit.

        “I want all humans to be able to change sex, race or species at will.”

        “Give every human being the ability to experience what someone else has experienced by pressing a small button on the top of our heads.”

        “Make volcanoes erupt food. Just endless, nutritious food for everyone.”

        “Babies are hatched from eggs. I dunno man, seems like it would be silly.”

        “No more mosquitoes. Replace them with tiny little airplanes that sometimes circle around you and you have to swat them down like king kong.”

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ideally our species survives and manages to send ships away from Earth well before that or you’re going to get a really warm summer eventually, followed by sitting on a charred ball of barren, airless rock for the majority of those trillion years.

  • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s neat, stars are just the sparks after the big bang, and “soon” that energy will be gone. Even with all the bad shit happening, it makes me happy to be alive in this beautifully short window of time in the universe, even if our little dust speck circling a spark is a bit fucked up sometimes

  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The last stars will burn out in 120 trillion years

    We think. We still haven’t solved things like the dark matter/energy problem. The answer to that alone could drastically change what we estimate will happen in the distant future.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Only up to iron is star poop. Anything heavier tends to be created by novae of various sizes. Technically nothing comes from the black hole, but many of the very heavy elements are birthed along side black holes.

            • Chakravanti@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Gravity and time come from every black hole. Neither of those are “things” in the sense that they aren’t matter. So don’t think I’m saying that you are any kind of wrong. Perhaps “thing” might be to vague to be technically accurate, though.

              Everyone here seems oblique in a vision of nothing in perspective, though. Come on, where do you think a big bang came from?

              There’s a cap limit to the size of a black hole because it will pop. Moreover, “The” is rather an inappropriate reference to a big bang. You might say “our” but infinity doesn’t mean what you think it means. Not due to any “limit” but due to math through adjacent dimensions you’re only just start to deduce the “obvious” nature of and think to look at. “How” is a whole other Giggle Maestro.

              If you need to understand how many dimensions there are…then you will never stop looking. Infinity is way more than we can but get a notion of.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, have you considered that the expansion of the universe generates or increases the total energy in the universe?

      As stars move apart, they gain both potential energy with respect to other stars, because greater distance from gravity sources means greater potential energy, but they also gain kinetic energy as they accelerate away from other objects. So, their mechanical energy (potential + kinetic energy) increases over time. Maybe somebody could build a clever machine out of this to harvest that energy?

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You should look up Penrose’s work in conformal cyclic cosmology.

        The short version is this: as the rarified universe becomes massless particles flying in all directions as space expands, it is basically the exact same conditions as the big bang. IE, when the universe fizzles out, from a different reference frame it’s still an infinite field of energy expanding out faster and faster.

        Just cross out the “distance” part of interactions between particles, without humans or anything with mass really to observe or interact with anything, the relationships between photons are all that matters, and from that perspective it will be the same as the big-bang state. All that’s important to look at is the relationships between these particles, the angles between them and probability of them interacting with each other.

    • iloveDigit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      We also haven’t tried every possible configuration of atoms to see if anything creates a portal to an infinite energy dimension or a perpetual motion machine or something we can use to make our own stars

      • Small_Quasar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Infinite energy is cheating. Same with travelling backwards in time.

        My intuition tells me the universe doesn’t allow cheaters.

        But then I’m just an evolved bag of water cells clinging onto a clump of rock so what the fuck do I know?

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Time travel is allowed for under our current models. Or rather, time travel doesn’t affect most parts of the current models, so it’s not cheating.

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I once reas a theory abou you needing to go faster than the speed of light which is not possible theorically

                PS: i am not a scientist i don’t know much, only some basic shit i learned for curiosity

    • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Stuff only burns for so long. We might learn more about the geometry of space and that there is more out there at greater distances where maybe even other Big bangs are possible but there is a certain maximum amount of time that a star can exist.

      Over the time scales of the life of a proton the maximum variability in the amount of time a star can burn is a rounding error against the scale of numbers needed to express the amount of time it takes for hawking radiation to reduce black holes to ultra long wavelengths of infrared radiation.

      • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, but we don’t have proof that universe can’t generate new matter. For all we know there is a mechanism in universe not yet observed that can create new matter out of little vacuum and more stars will keep forming.

        So technically all we can say is, it’s likely that stars will die out in 1000 trillion years.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, but we don’t have proof that universe can’t generate new matter.

          True… we also don’t have proof there isn’t a tea pot orbiting our Sun since it’s creation, either.

          However, there’s also a complete lack of evidence of it.

          You cannot prove a negative. The evidence says no new matter can be created. No evidence that new matter gets created. Therefore, we work on the model of no new matter creation.

          • tempest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            So if all the existing matter came from the big Bang, is it possible to condense it all back into one place?

          • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            But in this case, this “theory” has a precedent. This energy and matter we have now must have come from somewhere. Whatever your personal belief on the matter is, what’s to say that event can’t happen again? If a god created the universe, then surely he can pump some more into it.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Matter and energy can be converted. So, its possible it was never created, it just always was.

              • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s something I’ll never be able to understand. Something having no beginning. Just like I’ll never be able to understand a moment before the big bang, or at the moment of the singularity, where time did could not exist. If there’s no time, how can anything, like the big bang, happen? Unfortunately the singularity is something we know nothing about whatsoever, and probably will never know.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            On these scales, the accuracy of our observations should reduce our confidence though. It doesn’t make sense to confidently say that, in 200 trillion years there will be no stars, because our observations of the rate of new matter creation (approximately zero) have a margin of error which allows for there to still be some

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Until evidence shows otherwise, new matter being created doesnt fit our observations.

              Go prove that wrong! Win yourself a Nobel prize in physics! That’s what science is about!

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                I do also want to point out that stuff like “The conservation of energy” law, in other words, that energy cannot be created or destroyed, does not hold for our universe with our current models. An expanding universe violates the time-translation symmetry

                This is our current models. This is what our current physics says. And we know it’s incomplete.

                When it comes to scientific predictions, you always, always, need the caveat, “under our current model of”.

              • FishFace@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 months ago

                New matter being created with extremely low probability fits perfectly with our observations.

                • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  A teapot created with out solar system orbiting the sun fits our models, with an extremely low probability.

                  However, we dont work on that assumption being true.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The more you zoom out, the more you realize how insignificant we are. I’ve heard a lot of people realized this when they saw “The Pale Blue Dot” photograph of earth, but I had to have the perspective of time to realize it. We are nothing, not even a spit in the sea.

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well then I’m just going to enjoy the absolute fuck out of Hawking radiation and Mr pouty pants can sulk for 10^elebenty eons.