• [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      At this point if anything says Trump is doing something so ridiculously stupid that nobody would really do that then it is true because it has been 100% of the time.

      Sometimes I notice such a thing posted by the Onion and figure they found a way to predict the future.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Eh, Highschool age is probably too old for Trumps interest.

      Judging by the photos and how handsy he was with Ivanka, he probably likes them much younger.

  • Carvex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    4 days ago

    Lord Fuckwad has decreed “Some of you may die, but it is a sacrifice I’m willing to make”

    • currycourier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      “There was no indication the Patriot Games would pit competitors against each other in a fight to the death, as of this writing.” Lmaoo

      Funny thing is, if they decided policy this way I’d guess it’d be more representative than the House of Representatives for California.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’re giving Trump and his family busy work to do while people like Stephen Miller and Pete Hegseth do more heinous things. It will be as pathetic as their military parade.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      129
      ·
      4 days ago

      Oh no, there’s going to be all sorts of government contracts paid out for this. THEN nothing will be done.

      • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        I even turned off my adblocker for a bit to read this and there are so many pop ups after closing each one. The enshittification continues.

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          4 days ago

          Adblocking is a defense against malicious advertisers and scammers which makes it a security tool.

          Blaming adblock is like blaming people for going to the bathroom during commercials.

        • punchmesan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          If the online ad industry was just about serving ads you could say that I guess. Early Internet ads were usually placed pretty intrusively on websites, and very soon went from annoyance to security risk as ads became a disturbingly common vehicle for malware delivery. Today malware via ads is far less common but an ad isn’t just an ad – now ads are powered by, and an agent of, a surveillance network.

          If an ad could just be an ad it would actually be safe to roll without an ad blocker; I would infact do so as well unless a site was really egregious with their ad placement, I want to support websites doing good work. The Internet ad industry forced us into blocking their ads. My adblock never turns off, even for sites I’d very much like to support, because ads are just a pile of malicious code. Ad blockers would have stayed niche techy things if the ad industry wasn’t scummy as hell.

          So anyways, I feel I got a little rant-y. My point is that the ad industry themselves fed the demand for ad blockers. Ads themselves and website placement didn’t get egregious because of ad blockers, ad blockers became common because ads and ad placement got egregious.

    • bumblefumble@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well he didn’t say it per se, as he had an AI version of him announce it officially. Wish I was joking.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Yeah, the man has negative charisma. But like any other cult that survived long enough, that’s actually how it usually goes. Original guy is batshit crazy and has control over minds of his cultists, and when he dies the new guy is ruthless, efficient, and keeps in relative obscurity, and if he’s successful, the cult lives on. The second guy usually makes a cult into evil machine of hate, abuse, grift, and expansion.
          It happened with mormonism, it happened with scientology. If it will happen with maga it will be the catastrophic end of the US.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is not at all the worst idea he’s ever had

    It actually sounds kinda nice.

    Where’s he getting the money for it though?

    That. Is the question.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      if it wasn’t fascist bread and circus then by itself it isn’t a bad idea.

      in the context, it’s a shitty idea, especially when the economy is collapsing, pedo files are illegally held, and ICE is at war with American cities.

  • Gust@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Surely they’ll forget about bread if the circus is entertaining enough, right?

  • testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think this sounds fun? Would make for a fun “state pride” thing and would be fun to watch. Kind of like a mini Olympics.

    Calling it “the hunger games without the killing,” is a lot like saying “the Boston Marathon bombing but without the bomb.” Just a fairly normal athletic event.

    I don’t understand why people are up in arms over this. Is it maybe a silly thing for the president to be pushing for? Sure. But I’d rather him work on this than almost anything else he’s prone to work on.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s stupid on so many levels.

      No way a tiny state like North Dakota can produce two world class athletes, while powerhouses like California and Texas with have a plethora to choose from.

      But say it was actually fair and balanced. How do you set it up? I can’t think of a place in the country that’s ready to have a mini-Olympics on short notice. Do you know of any arena with a fifty lane track?

      And what sports are we competing in?

      It would take a smart person a couple of years to make this happen. Donnie thinks he can snap his fingers.

      • testfactor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean, you could say the same about the Olympics. There’s no way a small country like Jamaica could possibly beat a huge country like the US.

        But sometimes they do. That’s what makes it so exciting.

        And what are you on about a 50 lane track? Does the Olympics have a 200 lane track for all the countries? You do it in heats. Have you ever watched a track and field event? And practically every state has a facility that would support a track and field event with around 120 people. That’s not absurdly large.

        I assume it’d general track and field, though it’s a little odd if you just have 2 competitors per state to do all the events. Though I think that actually makes it a little more interesting. Kind of triathalon-y.

        I don’t think this is as hard to organize as you seem to think it is. Yes, it requires coordination and stuff, and is more than just a snap of the fingers, but if you assigned a qualified and well funded planning group to it, I’m confident you could get it put together by summer.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Jamaica spends more on its Olympic team than the US does. They enter around 60-70 athletes, while the US is spread thinner with around 600.

          So ultimately Jamaica spends over 10x per athlete. And that’s state funding, which the US doesn’t do. Team USA half-asses the Olympics, falling back on sheer population size to garner the required athletes at the right time, rather than having a proper training programme.

          • testfactor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Compare it to China then, which does state sponsor.

            Or, hell, South Dakota can state sponsor their Patriot Games athletes if they want, to try to give them an edge. Make it a point of state pride or whatever to pull better competitors than a state that’s bigger but doesn’t care.

            Alabama does better at college football nationally (historically) than much bigger states because of a culture difference. The idea that California would outperform them just because they’re bigger does not in fact bear out in reality.

    • bumblefumble@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s just a little on the nose with the one boy and one girl from each state. And let’s see how the diversity in these boys and girls will be, it’s probably gonna be some white ethnofascist bullshit parading around the perfect children. But let’s see.

      • testfactor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean, I assume that the states would be able to nominate their competitors themselves.

          • testfactor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m glad that’s not a thing anyone has said in real life then.

            Look, no one involved in coming up with this idea tied it to the hunger games, and no one thinks that you’ll actually have a “I volunteer as tribute” type thing going. And, not to put to fine a point on it, but “volunteering as tribute” loses a lot of it’s negative connotation when it’s not literally volunteering to go die in a gladiator pit.

            Trump has done innumerable things to be upset about. We don’t need to make up fake rage bait. Just look at the actual bad things he’s doing.

        • Rooster326@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Anyone can volunteer for tribute

          But only a select few will make it all the way to DC instead of say South Sudan, or El Salvador, or a quaint little island they know about…

          • testfactor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes, I agree the Trump administration has been disgusting with regards to immigration. Absolutely a stain on American history.

            It seems a stretch to tie this to that though.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Yes. Theoretically.

      Problem is:

      It’s classic Trump TBH. A good idea in an innocent way, if one totally ignores history and gives it the absolute benefit of the doubt. And his followers can use it to troll people who point out potential danger as ‘hysterical’.

      • testfactor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean, “the Nazis glorified youth sports” feels like an empty argument to me. Hitler liked dogs. That doesn’t make me morally obligated to hate dogs.

        And yeah, Trump has abhorrent policies in other areas that could taint this. That doesn’t mean this idea in particular is bad.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          To be clear, it’s “Nazis used national youth sports events to glorify eugenics.”

          You’re right. This is probably fine and innocent.

          But it feels creepy the same reason gameshow fiction feels creepy; historical context, and skirting but not quite crossing some lines. Like, this would be a lot less creepy if Trump and his party didn’t flirt with White Replacement Theory believers, or “fertility boosting” advocates like Vance. They’d absolutely advocate for this exact type of event, for all the wrong reasons.


          So yeah, if this is a wholesome high school olympics between states, I’m all for that. You shouldn’t be getting downvoted so much.

          …But stay skeptical, too. There’s a nonzero chance the messaging won’t be so pure.