• chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m not sure Firefox belongs on this list. Google finances Mozilla’s operation to the tune of $420M a year. It’s not for-profit, but it’s also not the same as the others.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      And the Blender foundation gets yearly donations from tech giants like Epic, NVidia, Unity, Google and even car makers like BMW and Volkswagen. Even Adobe, their competitor, sponsors them.

      It’s still a not-for-profit same with Mozilla. Doesn’t matter who funds them or how much they get in funding.

    • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Google wants to finance anything they can get their damn search engine into, that’s not entirely the fault of Firefox. I still use a firefox-based browser, but only for now.

      There is ladybird on the horizon, a browser being built from scratch, not based on either Gecko or Webkit.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Google funds them so their is “competition” in the browser space, to ward of antitrust lawsuits

      • chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 days ago

        Almost certainly not. All the offshoots from Mozilla’s tech rely first and foremost on Mozilla’s production of the foundational software, which eats up a significant portion of their roughly $500M/yr operational costs. The heavy development cost of modern browsers is why everything is either Chromium or Gecko-based.

        That said, Mozilla will be around as long as Chromium continues to dominate the market. Google literally funds Mozilla because it’s cheaper to prop up a competitor than it is to be sued by the government for monopolistic practices (check out 1998 decision against Microsoft for bundling Internet Explorer with Windows).

    • null@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It’s an easy paycheck for allowing Google as the default search setting. If Microsoft paid as much we would be seeing the same arguments about Bing.

  • SitD@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    🪟: absolutely atrocious. let’s do for-profit low quality software instead 😡

  • Konstant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Reminds me a local youtuber saying something similar about non-profit companies.

    They said it’s human nature to be driven by profit, so non-profits are profiting in some other way. Hence he prefers to give business to for profit companies as you know their intentions.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      IDK, but I’d rather be the beta tester for some open source project, or even contribute code to it (I fixed a language server this way), than to pay premium for a software, which I won’t “own”, has a bunch of microtransactions, and becomes lower and lower in quality.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well unfortunately he’s right. Most non-profit companies are profiting off of things like your donations and such like that. You look at the Susan g Komen foundation for breast cancer awareness. Something like 5% maybe 10% of all donated funds actually go to breast cancer research. The rest of the funds are used to fund the staff including those that are in charge of the board. And they have massive paydays.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      People at the heads of nonprofits are often highly compensated, and it’s rare that any of them solve the underlying problem or even make meaningful headway. It’s why there is so much “awareness” and short term band aids involved. A nonprofit that solves the problem it’s supposedly trying to solve has no reason to exist and will cost people well paying jobs managing it.

  • Luci@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    OpenTTD is the pinnacle of open source software. They should have stopped there

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    As someone who recently started getting into digital art, I’m genuinely shocked at how good Krita is.

    This is a raster graphics editor that could could potentially rival the likes of Photoshop, Affinity Photo and Paint Shop Pro in terms of features. GIMP by comparison is dogshit.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Blender is abso-freaking-great, I just wish they would have been less pokey pokey with the UI over the years.

      Search: how do i do X in blender

      Answer: Ctrl-Alt-Shift-_

      Me: Doesn’t work

      Answer: bobbit menu, right pane, third box down

      Me: Not there

      Answer: Rightclick from x mode and press Y

      Me: Not there

  • TalkingFlower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Man, you left out Obsidian, it is a godsend for studying and notetaking.

    Get an ultra-wide monitor, split it into four panes, one pane to import the pdf you want to read, another for note-taking, and spare another one for the AI for Markdown formatting and explaining texts (optional). I can’t think of a more efficient workflow for studying digitally.

    • minstrel@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      iirc, some plugins on obsidian are oss, obsidian and core plugins are closed, I remember trying to use joplin or other software because obsidian isnt foss

      • Muffi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The reason Microsoft sponsors it to universities is to get you used to their systems. Free yourself early, or you will start a long life of digital sunken cost that will make the change even more difficult.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yeah, they don’t let you self host the server for syncing either. They wanted like 8$ a month for their service last time I checked. It’s really nice software and you can use other apps for syncing but that aspect is annoying.

    • TurboToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is FreeCAD good for 3D printing stuff? I started learning fusion but I’m kinda digusted by being tied to autodesk

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I just started making some headway into using it and I’ve found it way less intuitive than Fusion. It also seems to be more finnicky about constraints and such. Like I wasn’t able to extrude something because I had lines intersecting each other. Just have to be more methodical and use more sketches I guess. Im still on my first project with it though and haven’t gotten to the point of printing anything yet though so take that with a grain of salt.

    • Muffi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s so ugly and unintuitive in the beginning, but when it clicks and you finally get it, it is pretty awesome (and surprisingly lightweight)

  • fum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why on earth is OpenOffice here??

    LibreOffice is the maintained fork.

    It has been that way for 16 years now.

    16 years.

    There are people working full time jobs who were born the same year that LibreOffice started.

    Stop promoting OpenOffice. People will have problems with it that have been long fixed it LibreOffice.

    • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Because I can understand “Open” while “Libre” sounds strange. — most people, probably

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    "Every machine has had the same history — a long record of sleepless nights and of poverty, of disillusions and of joys, of partial improvements discovered by several generations of nameless workers, who have added to the original invention these little nothings, without which the most fertile idea would remain fruitless. More than that: every new invention is a synthesis, the resultant of innumerable inventions which have preceded it in the vast field of mechanics and industry.

    Science and industry, knowledge and application, discovery and practical realization leading to new discoveries, cunning of brain and of hand, toil of mind and muscle — all work together. Each discovery, each advance, each increase in the sum of human riches, owes its being to the physical and mental travail of the past and the present.

    By what right then can any one whatever appropriate the least morsel of this immense whole and say — This is mine, not yours?"

    -Peter Kropotkin, The Conquest of Bread

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    5 days ago

    Openoffice -> LibreOffice

    Seriously, don’t use OpenOffice, it’s abandoned for over 10 years.