I mean have they seen how good Ice Cubes and Mlem look? How can they choose the default Twitter and Reddit apps over those masterpieces.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean have they seen how good Ice Cubes and Mlem look? How can they choose the default Twitter and Reddit apps over those masterpieces.

    No, they haven’t. 99% of people have never heard of the fediverse or any app within it.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        In a way, it’s a good sign. The threadiverse is tight-knit and comprehensive enough to become people’s primary social site. I’ve never seen any other reddit alternative get to this point.

        • MrShankles@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          It became my primary. Had never heard/understood federated-internet anything before lemmy. And it’s been a really good time here

          Reddit is now just a Quora for me, when I’m using a search engine. I don’t scroll Instagram, but just look at what (3) people send me. Facebook is for rare use-cases, so I haven’t deleted my account. YouTube I watch, rarely scroll, and don’t interact. And I think that’s about it currently

          Lemmy has it’s own issues/flavor for sure… but I dig it. I learned my first forum basics from Something Awful, and there’s a certain vibe here that reminds me of that. The fediverse (threadiverse? I haven’t heard that term) feels like an internet community center or something

          • morrowind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            threadiverse is for threaded apps like lemmy and kbin, as in practice they’re mainly a seperate network from things like mastodon.

    • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I told everyone in my family, and it was one ear and out the other.

      My sister told me the other day, “I didn’t know I could add reddit it to my Google search and get better results.” All I could think is, “you figured that out right when everything went to shit, damn.”

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, a lot of people have quit Twitter over Musk being a huge douche and migrated to… Blusky. And they think they’ve done something really great. It’s sad.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mastodon is not a twitter clone.

      Bluesky is a twitter clone, without musk. That’s all these people want. They’ve never heard about the fediverse. They’re not protesting corporate centralism.

      They just don’t like twitter being a right wing agenda. They want a twitter experience circa before musk bought it, simply because it was left wing before.

      That’s bluesky. That’s not mastodon.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Bluesky is…fine. Currently, it operates the way that I wish Twitter did. It lets you curate your feed, it shows the feed in chronological order, and finally and most importantly it has a critical mass of users so there is actual content there, rather than every 5th post complaining about how everyone is on another platform or not using Linux.

      Really, the only issue I have with it is that it is owned by a corporation. But like Twitter and Reddit, I am willing to abandon it for something else when it gets shittier.

      • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not OP, but the leadership has just shown themselves to be unable to run the platform how users want. They’re refusing to ban serial harasser Jesse Singal. Its head of trust and safety banned a bot and its creator because the bot pointed out that they liked a porn post on their work account for ‘harassment’. Bear in mind the entire point of Bluesky is for all this info to be public and easily accessible.

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        my personal dislike for it is that the claims of decentralization are countered by how expensive it is to operate in a truly decentralized manner.

        To be truly decentralized you would need to run a relay server, not just a PDS which many people already do and simply holds your data. Unfortunately, the cost to run a relay server today is already about $500+ a month [1] and will only be getting more expensive.

        Lastly, while the fediverse has figured out decentralized DM’s, Bluesky DM’s are completely centralized [1] and only work thanks to being funneled through their servers. I wouldn’t call what they have private considering they can read what everyone on Bluesky is saying privately. Granted, fediverse DM’s are not encrypted either, but at least they’re decentralized and don’t allow a single provider access to everyone’s private messages.

        [1] https://dustycloud.org/blog/how-decentralized-is-bluesky/

          • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Just saw some of your comments and really like how you’re using the spoiler tag. Will try to emulate it going forward. Appreciate your feedback and style. The internet urgently needs more comments backed by evidence!

            • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Just saw some of your comments and really like how you’re using the spoiler tag. Will try to emulate it going forward. […]

              FYI, I’ve heard a couple reports [1.1][1.2] that the spoiler tag isn’t rendered properly on some front ends currently. Despite that, I haven’t altered my usage of it, as I don’t have any viable alternative at the moment.

              References
              1. Title: “Happy #GlobalSwitchDay”. Author: @squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de. “Fediverse” !fediverse@lemmy.world. sh.itjust.works. Lemmy. Published: 2025-02-01T09:08:40Z. Accessed: 2025-02-05T03:24Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509/16428791.
                1. Comment: Author: @apex32@lemmy.world. Published: 2025-02-01T14:05:20Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509/16428791.

                  I wish Boost understood the collapsible spoilers.

                  On my client, it’s all expanded and I see all the formatting characters. It looks/works great in a browser though.

                  • This is in reply to a comment that used a collapsible spoiler.
                2. Comment: Author: “Victor” @victorz@lemmy.world. Published: 2025-02-01T15:39:09Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509/16430188.

                  Same with Sync, unfortunately.

                  • This was in reply to a comment saying:

                    I wish Boost understood the collapsible spoilers.

                    On my client, it’s all expanded and I see all the formatting characters. It looks/works great in a browser though.

            • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              […] Will try to emulate it going forward. Appreciate your […] style.

              Keep in mind that my citation style is still very much a WIP 😜. There’s a few things that I’m not sure exactly the best way to handle, at the moment. If you see inconsistencies in my citation style, it’s likely because I’m trying out a change in formatting to see if it works. I’m trying to not let perfect be the enemy of good, so I’m developing it as I use it. Eventually, if I can get it to a satisfactory state, I’m planning on publishing my citation style (likely in some git repo). That way, I can standardize it and version the changes.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just that there’s nothing keeping Bluesky from enshittifying the same way Twitter (and all the other centrally-corporate-owned social media platforms) have. By migrating, the former Twitter users are just delaying the inevitable.

        • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Just that there’s nothing keeping Bluesky from enshittifying the same way Twitter (and all the other centrally-corporate-owned social media platforms) have.

          Could you elaborate on what you mean?

          • TootSweet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m not sure what else I can say about it. Bluesky is a shareholder-owned company started by Jack Dorsey, one of Twitter’s co-founders. Current CEO of Bluesky has promised not to “enshittify” Bluesky with ads, but there’s nothing really holding them to that. There’s no federation, yet. Well, there is, but not the kind that makes platforms like Mastodon and Lemmy decentralized. That kind will require at best a lot of work and funding. There’s no guarantee it’ll happen. And no guarantee of interoperability with the Fediverse.

            At any time, they could decide they’ve locked people in well enough that they can change all the rules and fuck over the users without any negative reparcussions to them. Just like Reddit and Facebook and every other platform that has enshittified lately. They could flood Bluesky with ads, sell your data, align politically with fascists, sell to Twitter, just straight shut down, or any number of evil things that leave their users with the choice to quit the platform and lose all their connections or grit their teeth and bear it.

            On the Fediverse, if you don’t like something about your instance, you can switch instances and mostly still have contact with all the same content and other people. (For instance, on Mastodon, you can switch instances and keep your followers. The first Lemmy instance I joined shut down permanently, so I switched to Lemmy.World with basically no problems whatsoever.)

            • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I’m not sure what else I can say about it. Bluesky is a shareholder-owned company started by Jack Dorsey, one of Twitter’s co-founders.

              To be fair, Bluesky is specifically registered as a public benefit corporation [1]. Whether that will mean anything positive in the end, I guess, is to be determined.

              References
              1. “Bluesky”. Wikipedia. Published: 2025-02-04T19:39Z. Accessed: 2025-02-05T03:13Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluesky.
                • ¶1.

                  […] It is owned by Bluesky Social PBC, a benefit corporation based in the United States. […]

  • Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If all the average users were here, it would be just as awful as Reddit became when it hit mainstream acceptance level.

    Remember that subreddits there were quality when small but sort of became too large to have character after a certain threshold, I seem to recall 300k subscribers and up being about where that delineation was.

    Lemmy could stand to be more popular, but not too popular or it would attract the bottom feeders that make stupid one liner comments and upvote wrong answers.

    Enjoy the smaller lemmy while it lasts

    Edited for clarity, gotta drop the reddit shorthand

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      “The problem isn’t corporate, the problem is audience size.”

      Shut the fuck up about this.

      Lemmy isn’t anything right now. No impact or relevance, no practical effect in terms of community and influence. It’s just small conversations and mild entertainment.

      If you enjoy that, go ahead. But don’t campaign to hold the whole fediverse project back.

      Just get together in a niche instance with your small town types and defederate if the project successfully becomes a full fledged alternative. The Internet needs a successful full scale alternative to corporate social media to have a chance at recovery from enshittification.

      • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Both of you can be correct. Some communities (e.g. technical subjects like photography, self hosting, etc.) can work well at lower numbers. Some others might be more social were numbers might allow more organic interactions.

        Here like Reddit, the best experience is achieved by trying to find the ones you are interested in and following them. It is more apparent here I think since there is not as much content.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, the issues I have with it it’s that the whole project is pointless if we intentionally stop short of dethroning corporate social media.

      • Shortstack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not a campaign, its an observation based on whats come before. It’ll come for lemmy the same as it did for reddit.

        I’ll adapt as it grows like before, but the fact remains that online communities are at their best when it isnt 3 million subscribers shouting over each other. On the flip side, 3 million users would likely spawn enough interest for super niche communities to self sustain themselves. The broad interest communities though, those will become just like reddit is now.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          No it’s not a campaign but it’s a sizable unorganized proportion of Lemmy who wants to argue for soft isolationism and little to to outreach, recruiting and general onboarding/accessibility reworks that would make Lemmy too easy to understand and join.

  • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I guess most people don’t want to wade through dozens of “eat the rich” posts every time thay open their favorite social media platform.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or any political content at all. Most people just want to look at funny cats or memes.

      Other people want absurd humor without the racist degeneracy of other outlets.

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I quit FB and reddit because they became mostly “kill all who don’t work minimum wage at mcdonalds”, “all minorities r bad” and “ukranians are nazis but check out this 3d model which is the next russian wundewaffe that will kill your countries civillians”

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lemmy doesn’t have much to offer compared to the “billionaire run” social media.

    • relic_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This is the real answer. I forget the exact numbers, but the vast majority of people on reddit are just lurkers. When you have an enormous user base, that still translates to lots of content to consume. Lemmy has way less content and very small communities (if any) for most niches.

      Of course you can point to bots on reddit inflating those numbers and that Lemmy has more meaningful interaction, but that’s not what most are looking for that are on reddit.

      Also, as others mentioned, there’s no negative engagement algorithm drivers on mastodon like there is on Twitter. Fact is, a lot of people just like to be angry and combative.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Good point, if I just wanted to lurk reddit would be fine for that purpose. But the users are so wretchedly toxic that commenting is a no-go.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is not entirely true, at least as phrased here.

      1. Our quality of discussions is way higher, in our opinions, even though yes their topic range is so much more narrow (Star Trek, Linux, various Fediverse aspects, etc.).
      2. There are no ads, for some that is VERY noteworthy, especially those less technically inclined.
      3. As others mentioned the apps here blow the official Reddit one out of the water.
      4. (Edit: there is much more, I did not intend this listing to necessarily be comprehensive, e.g. one that I see people mentioning is a focus on user privacy.)

      So all of this is not “nothing”, even though yes it is also not “everything” either.

      • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yea but can lmy run on Lynx browser?

        …seriously asking cause I want to start using the Lynx browser for more.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The quality of discussion is the exact same. Lemmy isn’t more elite, hell I’d say an average user is more angry in general than on reddit. As for the rest - a regular (non-power) user doesn’t care. The privacy angle is bogus - you can get everything you want by hosting your own instance. Even more so - things that should be private, aren’t (reports, upvotes). The only “good” thing is the modlog, but that is also debatable.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s unfortunate, but there’s a real chicken-and-egg problem here. Those of us who are on here are here because of how strongly we believe in the ideal of it, but for the average person who just cares about talking about their favourite interests, there’s a serious lack.

    I’ll use two examples, one that you clearly care about, and one that I do. /r/stopkillinggames is hardly super active, but in the last 3 weeks it’s had 11 posts with a cumulative 68 comments. !stopkillinggames@lemm.ee, by contrast, has had just 8 posts, all by a mod, with just 6 total comments. /r/AgeofMythology is very active with artistic appreciation posts, balance discussion, and advice just within the last 24 hours. !aom@lemm.ee has failed to attract a single post from anyone other than myself, and it’s been over 3 months since anyone other than myself has left a comment. It’s disheartening, not being able to have conversations about the stuff you love, when you know that just over there it would be so easy.

    Lemmy’s excellent if you want to talk about politics, or open source, but there’s not a huge amount outside of that. The Star Trek communities are pretty good, but they pale in comparison to a great sub like /r/daystrominstitute, and the amount and depth of discussion on ttrpg.network is slim compared to /r/pathfinder2e, /r/dndgreentext, /r/dndnext, etc. And these are some of the best-supported hobbies on Lemmy.

    So as much as I’m staying here and trying to do my part to make it better, and frequently encourage others to join…I also can’t really blame people who don’t.

    (I feel less charitably towards people on Twitter. Because that place is a total shithole, and Mastodon is surprisingly good, if you like microblogging platforms. Plus even Bluesky is better than staying on Twitter, and it has most of the celebrities and micro-celebrities some people might want to follow.)

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      To add to Blaze’s point: as lemmy’s still small, there’s not much point to super specialized communities when the more general ones are “slow” enough that pretty much any post you make can remain “newest” for 2 days straight.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I understand this perspective, and I occasionally flirt with it myself, but mostly I disagree.

        My main view is that content should go in a community that will be interested in it. There’s a balance to be struck here to avoid getting hyper specific (for example, I’ve stopped using !brisbanetrains@aussie.zone in favour of just putting train stuff in !brisbane@aussie.zone), but I also think content that is fundamentally not about the topic of one community shouldn’t go in that community. I wouldn’t post Brisbane-specific local council politics in !australia@aussie.zone, for example.

        My view is that subscribing to a community costs nothing. Creating a community costs nothing. Even moderating a community doesn’t have any very much cost for the moderator on a per-community (as opposed to per-post or per-comment) basis. There’s no actual harm caused by having 10 communities with 1 post per day, compared to one community with 10 posts per day. Instead, doing the former simply allows people to more easily filter for the content that they are interested in and avoid that which they are not.

        I’ve given a more detailed reply to Blaze about the specific discussion at hand here, but since you brought up the general principle, I thought I’d reply to you with my general principle.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah that’s true, good point. I think the best option might be more dedicated communities but with strategic use of cross-posting/cross-promoting on occasion, with posts that do fit better in the general community. For example, I intend to post about major new releases of aom to broader game communities, and I will continue to mention that I’ve been playing it in threads like “what have you been playing” or other open question gaming-related threads, and put a promo for the community in those comments. But stuff that is too specific to the game, like balance patches and civ tier lists, would stay only in the specific community.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      At least we have tankies, so there’s that.

      I jest, yet that’s a real worry that a large number of people have, like on Reddit when people (Blaze) promotes Lemmy that is quite often their first response (“hey, isn’t that the one where tankies who got booted off of Reddit went and made their own Reddit software?”).

      That, and the fact that we are first and foremost, primarily a “Linux forum”. We do have general communities like AskLemmy and I even helped start an AskUSA so I’m not saying that there’s nothing else there, but we definitely lack the breadth and depth present on Reddit.

      Maybe we can find better talking points, like “we have less content but our discussions are more worthwhile, where people tend to be kinder and also real rather than bots btw”.

      Although Lemmy.World’s massive policy change announcement is definitely going to absorb all of our attention for the foreseeable future.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re talking about people that are content with “the internet” being google, facebook, instagram, snap, tiktok, youtube and twitter, nothing more.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    As a non tech expert, in my view, the biggest concern for the fediverse to grow, presently, is how difficult it can be to sign up.

    Go to a instance listing, try and choose one, signup… all of this should be acessible but mostly invisible for the average user. The user should only be questioned what sort of content they mostly intend to browse, have a NSFW explicit option, perhaps a server location preference, and that should be it.

    Beneath the hood, this process should trigger a call to the network requesting a user slot for any server that could cater to that generic profile the prospect user filled. Even bans should be handled differently, in my opinion.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Imagine to go over all that… To end up on .ml

      You’re 100% on point. From first attempt to getting my final account it took me a few weeks. Had an instance close down days after joining, another blocking communities I was interested, sign up denied…

      In fucking reddit you don’t even need a real email

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I only used my email for safety purpose; I tend to forget passwords.

        Again, as someone with very low technical skills, I think things could be tweaked to increase traction. Even funding.

        I’m not even adverse to see advertisement on the Fediverse, as long as those trying to advertise here keep in mind they want to reach the user base here, not the other way around. To this, it would imply low impact, discreet and highly curated advertisement.

        Instances closing down don’t shock me. People have other things to do: real life should take precedence over social media. I like to be here but when my smartphone broke and I was back on a Nokia brick, I didn’t missed it.

        An instance shutting down should automatically request to the network transfer of its subscribed users. Again, something the users should be aware of but completely invisible to them.

        And even bans should work like that. A user may become persona non grata but they still should be capable of accessing the rest of the network or, at least, request transfer. Hard bans, in my view, only create malice and the creation of other accounts, that will just eat the capability of the instance to receive new users.

  • Sergio@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The fediverse is like a cafe with an unusual menu and interesting conversations. Most social media is like a McDonald’s in Altoona PA.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Another contributing factor is that Lemmy & Mastodon “care about privacy”. Odd, in my opinion, for a public social network.

    Their interpretation of that is that they don’t send referer headers. So to any site receiving Lemmy traffic, we’re invisible.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pretty sure that it’s the browser which is sending referrer headers, not the individual sites. That being said, even if a provider were looking at the refer headers in their analytics to determine where people were coming from, it would not show one url, but hundreds for all the different instances there are. This would cause Lemmy to be under represented in analytics, even if in aggregate it’s the largest source of traffic.