• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Every single one of them look like their eyes are about to roll right out of their heads.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s mainly funny, because all the women look bored out of their mind. It makes it look like they’re letting Greg blather on, even though none of his points are novel to them. And Greg has such a massive ego that he doesn’t notice no one is listening to him.

      Obviously, yes, Greg probably is just a person without ego talking normally. But him being the only dude in the picture and the only one talking, the mansplaining interpretation is a little too close for comfort, which makes it funny.

      • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        "It’s mainly funny, because all the women look bored out of their mind. "

        That’s just how people look in most academic conversations.

        • addictedtochaos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          I wonder why they don’t leave, why do they subject themselves to this guy’s domination?

          are they weak or something?

      • addictedtochaos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        well, my whole class looked like that when we had to listen to the teacher, aint that so in the usa?

        not most of the time, but from time to time.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          The picture seems to be from Australia, I’m from Germany, so uh, no idea about the USA. 🙃

          And yes, that can be a normal situation, but if we recognize that it’s a joke, we can still see the resemblance and find that humorous.

          • addictedtochaos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            yeah, it took it far to serious, let it be a joke. ;-)

            ich hab auch schon so gelangweilt an einem großen tisch gestanden, in einer gruppe von gelangweilten menschen.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      We can’t have a dude explain things to girls because girls can’t be interested in what a guy has to say. Girls good. Guys bad.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m more intrigued by what appears to be a ghost arm behind his right shoulder.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I choose to believe the more wholesome version that this is their gay, autistic, and genuinely endearing friend who got started on his special interest without realizing that nobody else cared, and his friends otherwise like him enough that they’re trying to figure out how to move the conversation forward without hurting his feelings after they all lost interest minutes ago.

    “So during Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, Spock is passing through decks in the Enterprise, and we see one called Deck 78. Now you see, this class of Enterprise only has 23 decks, and so unless we assume someone misnamed this deck, how did this one get here? Some fans have speculated that maybe maybe Q put it there as a practical joke to confuse the audience, but why would Q use the number 78 specifically? This could be a reference to the episode All Our Yesterdays in The Original Series which is production code 78. In this episode, Spock reverts to being emotional like his primitive ancestors after traveling back through time, and this could be hinting to the idea that he secretly feels emotions for his half-brother Sybok who’s the antagonist of the movie.”

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        After successfully docking with his long-lost step brother, the Enterprise ventures off after Q, anonymously masquerading as 78 Christmas trees each one representing the different layers of love that Spock feels towards the 23 decks.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The interpretation in the rest of this thread is that this man is being a sexist, condescending douchebag to his peers. I hope “overly enthusiastic about your favorite subjects” is better than that.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fair enough. But it doesn’t look like either of those, it’s looks like a tutor or study group and they’re literally just having a conversation. I guess I’m not surprised some people on lemmy don’t know what a conversation among friends looks like.

          • stangel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I dunno, the one in the top right looks like she’s seriously reconsidering her life choices…

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Neither do you, it seems. Given this is an ad for a university, it’s pretty clear to me this is intended to represent some type of group project or study group.

            Doesn’t imply they’re friends at all.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why can’t there just not be people deciding he’s being condescending for being straight and tutoring some girls?

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    All of those faces look really annoyed.

    If it doesn’t scream “mansplaining” it at least says “this meeting could have been an email”.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        The term “public relations” is literally propaganda to make propaganda look better. It was just called propaganda before WWII but then there was a propaganda campaign to increase local resistance to propaganda from the Nazis and then the Communists. And it worked, so they needed more propaganda to get the local propaganda to work again.

          • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            This was bait to get you to mention the podcasts you are listening to so I could either say “me too!” or find something new to listen to.

            What you said about propaganda was reminiscent of Amy Westervelt’s research in “Rigged.”

  • flora_explora@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    This meme gave me some comic relief, thanks for posting! But the comments here are horrible. I would like to forget how lemmy is mostly cis dudes but it’s moments like these it gets super apparent… :(

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe you’ll like my interpretation of this image! I believe those women are a coven of witches politely waiting for that guy to finish talking so they can begin their ritual sacrifice to The Morrigan.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      We should all be decent, empathetic, and compassionate enough people that the demographic breakdown doesn’t create a negative effect like that.

      I’m one of the many cis dudes here, and I just cannot get offended when it gets pointed out that other dudes can be assholes. Or that other Americans can be assholes. Or other humans, for that matter.

      • flora_explora@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unfortunately that is hardly ever the case. Most people’s way to think about themselves and how they act differs greatly and thus they have to bridge this gap in some way. People like to think of themselves as tolerant, open-minded or empathetic, but once you start to confront them in any way with how they are acting problematic in any way, they usually start to get defensive or try to twist reality around so that it fits with their positive view on themselves. And by “confronting” I don’t necessarily mean that you even have to actually have to tell them about this mismatch, just by existing as a person can trigger this reaction in person. That is, only by being trans or by beingvegan people think that they have to defend themselves somehow. And it gets even trickier to actively help people reflect upon their own actions. The huge number of people that have tried to explain me that discrimination isn’t real is so frustrating. Most people life in their fantasy world not wanting to think critically about themselves. And if one has these mental barriers, empathy or compassion doesn’t really help either because in order to protect their skewed view on themselves they cannot access their empathy.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s so funny because he looks so sincere and precious and all the women look so annoyed but polite haha

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Those women are waiting for him to finish so they can correct the numerous errors in his scientific reasoning.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      This has always happened to women. I mean, men do it do men too, but other men counteract that by doing it too. As a cis man I’ve encountered way too many cringe worthy situations from my fellow men.

      If you’re never experienced mansplaining you might now actually know what it is about.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh yes. Only men mansplain. It’s in the genetics.

        Do trans men also mansplain? They’re biologically female, so they might be incapable.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          It isn’t only men, it is just the biggest group.

          Us men are taught that our opinion is always valuable. A noble goal I am sure.

          But women still get too many “go back to the kitchen” comments whenever they give their opinion. From the more sleazy and sexist people around.

          Yes, every person has the potential to mansplain, but the group that gets attacked for it the most (even if it is not called mansplaining) tend to do it less.

          • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Us men are taught that our opinion is always valuable.

            As a man I’ve been told no one wants my opinion since the 2000s so I’m not sure where you’re getting this from.

            • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              There’s that saying about equality in an unequal society feeling like oppression. I think it applies here. Of course I don’t know your particular life circumstances but I would bet you’re being a bit hyperbolic.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        You went off the rail when you used “women” and “men” instead of “people”.

        I’m not exactly sure which one is more frequent, the behaviour itself or the accusation thereof as thought- and conversation-terminating cliche, but both suck donkey ass. OTOH it’s not some special grand thing in itself, either, it’s plain old failure to relate and communicate.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Of course it sucks when both do it. But one group does it far more often. Your argument sounds like the “all lives matter” of “black lives matter”.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            But one group does it far more often.

            With “one group” you presumably mean egocentric people in general, and nothing sexed. Because otherwise: Citation or you’re a sexist. And with “citation” I mean “controlled for perceptive biases”.

            Your argument sounds like the “all lives matter” of “black lives matter”.

            Plenty of citations for racial bias by US police so no, it really shouldn’t. Side note though: The moment the assclowns came up with “all lives matter” the BLM folks should have jumped on it and used it themselves. It’s a much more powerful message, and impossible to argue against. With the momentum they had they could easily have drowned out the racists.

            • dfecht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              “Mansplaining isn’t real, but quick sidenote here is how the black community should have handled their outrage if they wanted to be more effective.”

              Bruh.

              By the way, the entire point was to explicitly point out that BLACK lives matter, because they are systematically treated as if they do not, and BLM was an attempt to force people to come to terms with that fact. “All lives matter” is a hollow, whitewashed response that gave racists a shield to hide behind, allowing them to pretend like they cared about “all” lives, but really from its inception all it meant was “White lives matter.” Co-opting that slogan would have just allowed everyone to brush the conversation under the rug even more quickly than they did.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Mansplaining isn’t real,

                Not a thing I said.

                but quick sidenote here is how

                That was Eurosplaining. I do that all the time to Yanks and I stand by it.

                And yes MLK was rotating in his grave that day. What’s your point, here? That it would befit me to want to see black folks being ineffective in their struggle? Is that really where you want to go with this? Want to continue racistjacketing me?

                And just for the record I already talked about this with actual BLM organisers. They agreed, it was a missed opportunity, hindsight is 20/20, etc. The issue isn’t even lack of institutional knowledge – the civil rights movement is literally the textbook case on how to stage such things effectively – the “trouble” (not really, but form this perspective) is that the whole movement gained momentum so quickly that people didn’t have time to organise properly.

                Co-opting that slogan would have just allowed everyone to brush the conversation under the rug even more quickly than they did.

                Co-opting that slogan would have carried on momentum that was broken by getting into a fight with the slogan. It allowed energy to be diverted from opposing specific state structures to opposing a slogan.

                This isn’t about “oh but white racists came up with it so now it’s a bad slogan”, it’s not about dictionary semantics at all that’s not how social movements or political messaging works. If Black people shout “All lives matter” then that’s saying “Hey we’re people too”. It’s saying “Not just your lives matter”. It’s also saying “if your schizophrenic kid got shot by out of control police, go come join us”: It allows for a broader movement, overall more solidarity.

                You know what’s the worst part about this? The right is really good at this kind of stuff. They understand it. They didn’t go out saying “Black lives don’t matter” or “Fuck N****s”, they went out chanting “All lives matter”. Because they knew exactly that it was their most effective shot at breaking BLM’s momentum, even though they sure as fuck don’t care about all lives.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Buddy, you just went off the rail when you decided that means anything other than specifically including both genders in the ‘not caring’ category.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Previously to the word mansplaining this was just men being sexist.

      I’m surprised Oldsplaining doesn’t exist as a word.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Running commentary would still have the same concepts, just not encapsulated in a single word