• faltryka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    341
    ·
    14 days ago

    At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s so much bigger than this. It starts young. iPad kids. Strict gender roles. Sexualization of children. Learning from parents who have been conditioned by capitalism, sexism and more. We got little girls that want skincare products and teens talking about plastic surgery. It’s bad.

      Agreed though. Punish people for ruining society. I think I read a while ago that France had required social media posts to flag when images have been altered. We need more laws like this too.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        And mass sharing of images/videos which has made it so much easier to connect people, specifically in one case I saw today of someone on Telegram sharing child porn. How do you even put the cat back in the box?

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          People don’t want to hear it, but AI. Used intelligently and responsibly.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            That does make sense, although I’m not sure we can trust it to work like that.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Unfortunately, the “used intelligently and responsibly” part is why people dislike AI - they don’t trust companies or people to use it that way (and for good reason based on the results so far).

            Plus, it’s not gonna put everything back into Pandora’s Box. What we’re in is a societal and cultural arms race where AI is just another escalation that’s being used by both sides.

            • venusaur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              It’s funny you reference Pandora’s Box. I often use it to refer to the growth of AI and people’s resistance towards it. It’s not going anywhere. It’s not slowing down. We gotta make it work for us.

      • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        As little kids we got like no genderbased education from our parents. When we moved our grandmother got a lot more control and dumped blue boyish stuff on my brother and forbid the girly things. Has never worn a dress since and now is still not willing to wear one

        (it could be that us older sisters influenced that he wants to wear dresses too)

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Bummer. Happens to almost all men in the US. Maybe less now, but this new red pill generation is wild.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          I need context to understand your story. How old was your brother when you moved? How often was he wearing dresses before the move? How quickly did it stop? And how old is he now?

          • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago
            • he was ~4 years old
            • i actually dont know how often, but i would guess as often as we others too. from what i understood he actually liked it so often enough
            • a few weeks or months (was 5 at the time so its mostly something i heard from older siblings & mother)
            • 21 i think
        • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 days ago

          It has always been this way. When you get old, 15 year olds and 19 year olds start to all look the same.

          Similarly, to teenagers a 40 year old and a 60 year old look the same. Old.

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 days ago

          It’s hard to say if it’s one of those things that older gens say is different with newer gens even though it the same. I will say though, the convergence of sexualization of children and infantilization of adults have been narrowing the gap and maybe one is winning over the other.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        140
        ·
        14 days ago

        Thus far, they’d basically be right. Any fines are simply chocked up to “cost of doing business” expenses and since no one wants to either make solid laws against this stuff OR hold them accountable for current ones, they’ll just keep at it.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            That depends on if it is a dayfine or not.

            A fine of €500 for speeding will only really affect poor people, 30 dayfines which value is dictated by the wealth of the individual is a better system.

            • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              This can be hard to implement and avoidable through “creative accounting” (e.g. living off daddy money with no declared income) so as a hybrid/additional solution fines should turn into penalties over repeat offences.

              Some countries use points licensing where your driver’s license will simply be taken away if you have too many recent infractions on record.

              Companies should also be prevented from doing certain kinds of business if they repeatedly break the law. We have legal frameworks for this, we are just refusing to apply them due to politics and corruption.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Oh you mean fines? Sure here’s some money $$.
      Meanwhile AD rev is $$$$$. Just the cost of doing business!
      Hahahaa

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    14 days ago

    Goddam I had to read that headline 3 times before I understood the implication!
    That is outright disgusting, and such practices ought to be outlawed.
    Or as Trump would say, very cool and very legal way to make money.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        And I genuinely loved all that stuff as a kid, usually liking the ad (e.g., TMNT cartoon) more than the toys (e.g., TMNT action figures).

        As your typical Lemmy user who loves Linux and hates advertisements, I sometimes have to remind myself about that when my son is watching today’s dumb kid shows. Teaching him about the systems in play rather than isolating him from it has been working well IMO.

        The bonus is that he doesn’t watch full-on advertisements and commercial breaks like we were forced to in the 80s when it was live TV or no TV.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 days ago

          The bonus is that he doesn’t watch full-on advertisements and commercial breaks like we were forced to in the 80s when it was live TV or no TV.

          I think the problem for modern youth is that there’s no way to tell what’s an ad anymore. Scrolling through TikTok or any social media will show you tons of advertisements which are not marked as advertisements.

          The mainstream internet is driven by advertising. At least when I was a kid we could step out during the commercial breaks.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            I think the problem for modern youth is that there’s no way to tell what’s an ad anymore.

            Too true. Fortunately my kid is too young for full blown social media, so I have a few more years to keep teaching him.

        • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          For anyone that is downvoting this. Go ahead and try to run a business without advertising, let me know how that works out for you.

          • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Some level of advertising is a necessary evil when you’re in a capitalist system because otherwise people have no way to get their products out ti the market. There’s a balance to be struck.

            Hell even in other systems advertising is still important for finding out about cool new things even if money no longer exists

          • mcv@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I know one example of advertising that I liked: the creators of Penny Arcade had only advertisements for computer games that they liked. And they made those ads in the same art style as their own comic.

            Advertisements are good when they’re an honest endorsement. Any others are inherently deceptive and often invasive.

        • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          This is one of those bizarre Lemmy echo chamber things. I’ve never seen this sentiment that advertising is evil and should be stopped at all costs anywhere else but on Lemmy it’s super common. Idk where it comes from. I get that advertising kind of sucks but it just seems like a weird thing to get so passionate about especially considering how many other things are wrong with the world. Sorry you’re getting downvoted to hell, you’re not crazy, Lemmy is.

        • psivchaz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          It’s the state of advertising tbh. If ads were still of the “Look, here’s a cool product” variety, or even the “Look, here’s people happily using a cool product” kind then the world would probably be a better place. Even targeting isn’t so bad, when it’s broad like “We want businesses to know about our B2B product.”

          The evil in modern advertising is the overly specific targeting, the lying, the psychological tricks, and the way they seem to invade every possible space.

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          They can put up signs inside their business windows. That’s plenty. Everything else is a blight.

            • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Oh they had roadside billboards in 1950. And they were a blight back then. Advertising is a cancer.

                • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 days ago

                  Haha what? I’m not burning billboards and slaughtering CEOs. I’m just sick to death of all these ads. Advertising is a distributed global brainwashing campaign, by the wealthy, against the working class. They don’t hire psychologists to exploit our lizard brains for no reason, and that’s why it needs to be outlawed.

            • Snowclone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              They are making billboards illegal in most places. And it’s a pretty awesome improvement I must say.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s mot that we hate teenage girls (and women) so much. It’s just money. Soulless, apathetic money making.

      A teenager is in a vulnerable state. Some more than others. But self esteem, self worth, and existentialism are things that a teenager as, at the very least, a brush with.

      An emotionally vulnerable person is more open to suggestion. Religion does this a lot. Advertising is no different.

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      12 days ago

      We don’t hate them, it’s just that capitalism has found them to be an easy and vulnerable target for manipulation.

      • gradual@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I agree.

        I feel like the powers that b have people working overtime to ensure that most Western women feel like they need to consume to be accepted by their peers.

        What’s particularly sad is it’s the exact opposite. That culture of consumption also comes with an aura of exclusivity. Most of these girls are miserable because they’ve been conditioned to consume as much as possible while thinking anyone who consumes less isn’t good enough for them.

        It’s really good for putting them to work, not so good for making them or the people around them happy.

  • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    14 days ago

    Be aware that the companies would have paid Facebook handsomely to identify users in this way. The world we live in has a sickness with greed for money at its heart.

    • grumpasaurusrex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Per Careless People, the recent memoir that this article pulls from & facebook has been trying to kill, this was one of the many unethical advertising schemes that ultimately traces back to Sheryl Sandberg. A woman who didn’t allow her own children to use fb because she knew she was making it a toxic capitalist hellscape.

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      This is the sort of thing machine learning algorithms are pretty good at at.

      Coupled with however many millions of interactions a day, you would have no problem correlating changes to your algorithm against increases in revenue.

      But. It’s often not that impressive. Humans are equally good at noticing patterns.

      All it takes is for one person at FB to see their wife or daughter delete a post, ask them “why did you delete that post” and take away from the response of “It made me look fat” to go “there’s a new targeted ad that’ll get me a bonus”.

      In a similar vein, 80% of your banks anti-fraud systems isn’t deep learning models that detect fraudulent behaviour. Instead it’s “if the user is based in Russia, add 80 points, and if the account is at a branch in 10km of Heinersdorf Berlin, add another 50…. We’re pretty sure a Russian scammer goes on holiday every 6 months and opens a bunch of accounts there, we just don’t know which ones”.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’d bet on it being algorithmic from Facebook because leaning into algorithms is part of that company’s culture. A bunch of manual tweaks require maintenance, though it wouldn’t surprise me if someone was thinking about this when deciding that deleted selfie should be a different signal to the algorithm than deleted picture of cat.

    • Captain Janeway@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      14 days ago

      The most generous assumption is that they use statistics to determine correlations like this (e.g., deleted selfies resulted in a high CTR for beauty ads so they made that a part of their algo). The least generous interpretation is exactly what you’re thinking: an asshole came up with it because it’s logical and effective.

      Either way, ethics needs to be a bigger part of the programmers education. And we, as a society, need to make algorithms more transparent (at least social media algorithms). Reddit’s trending algorithm used to be open source during the good ole days.

  • adm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    Let’s not pretend that we don’t have this type of thing happen to us. Maybe not beauty products but any time I slip outside of my ad blockers I’m made accurately aware that they’re always listening. It’s not a coincidence the ads you see, the TikToks, and the Facebook ads. It’s just used for adds right now but it should scare the shit out of people.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    If any of the big companies were turned into a human, they would all be Epstein

  • Epzillon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    14 days ago

    Happy I got AdNauseam after uBlock Origin. Deleted my facebook a year ago, shit is an AI slopfest built upon the greed and manipulation of every part of the chain. Defcon 31 has a good talk that brings this up. “Disenshittify or die” by Cory Doctrow, cann recommend to watch.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I stopped using mainstream social media in 2019 but my accounts are still active so I can snoop on random people I went to college with and holy shit every time I get on Facebook it’s so much worse on ways I don’t even understand. Most recently I got on to look at something and my feed was completely unrecognizable because it was all AI generated slop from pages I have never heard of and not any updates from people I know. It’s crazy what people will accept if it’s done slowly enough I guess. I legitimately don’t understand why anyone would use Facebook as it exists today. At least when I quit I could at least understand why people used it.

      • Epzillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        The more time you spend glued to your screen the less you notice slow changes. I assume this is part of why user retention is so important…

      • Epzillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        An extension of uBlock Origin. It does the same thing but also clicks on every ad before it removes it.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      14 days ago

      I support the use of AdNauseam. Not sure if there are any more extreme alternatives, I now choose to be actively hostile towards advertising/tracking rather than just passively blocking it.

      • Epzillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        My dad has been talking about wanting something like AdNauseam for years, i was very happy when i found it. The extra mile would probably be to expand it with a VPN and constantly spam clicks, clear cache, switch IP and obfuscate data. Now we just wait for someone with enough time to build it…

  • Therobohour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    That’s 0% surprising. FB had always been about making girls feel bad. It’s in its sorce code

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 days ago

      Facebook started as a Hot or Not website. Fucking creepy.

      YouTube also started because the founders wanted to see the Janet Jackson nipple slip. (Which fuck them for that.)

      • Therobohour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Ya FB is,was and will forever be bad for society and woman especially

        I mean,do you really think janet jackson didn’t want people to see?

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I mean,do you really think janet jackson didn’t want people to see?

          No, I don’t.

          It’s interesting how Justin Timberlake had a career after that incident; when was the last time anyone’s heard from Janet Jackson?

          I don’t see how this is different from revenge porn.

      • Therobohour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Ya FB is,was and will forever be bad for society and woman especially

        I mean,do you really think jackson didn’t want people to see

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      14 days ago

      Probably nothing. Most likely, a paid consultant to give ideas. And if it was a worker, they were just doing their job and at most got a “great job, keep up the good work,” praise email.