A Massachusetts couple claims that their son’s high school attempted to derail his future by giving him detention and a bad grade on an assignment he wrote using generative AI.

An old and powerful force has entered the fraught debate over generative AI in schools: litigious parents angry that their child may not be accepted into a prestigious university.

In what appears to be the first case of its kind, at least in Massachusetts, a couple has sued their local school district after it disciplined their son for using generative AI tools on a history project. Dale and Jennifer Harris allege that the Hingham High School student handbook did not explicitly prohibit the use of AI to complete assignments and that the punishment visited upon their son for using an AI tool—he received Saturday detention and a grade of 65 out of 100 on the assignment—has harmed his chances of getting into Stanford University and other elite schools.

Yeah, I’m 100% with the school on this one.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    2 months ago

    “a grade of 65 out of 100 on the assignment—has harmed his chances of getting into Stanford University and other elite schools.”

    No, using AI tools harmed his chances…

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I can’t really understand why anyone would think that you wouldn’t fail for this. You’re being tested on your ability to do something and having a machine do it for you. At most generous to AI it’s like bringing calculators to an arithmetic class.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bringing a calculator to math class still requires you to know which formula to use and when. It’s not the same as asking an AI to do it all.