In a deal involving a company owned by Jared Kushner, a company that is basically just the Saudis, and $20B of debt.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wow did not see this coming. Saudi Arabia is desperate to diversify so from that angle it makes sense. Kushner wants in lol. That’s a big buyout though. Well, things are going to get weird.

    From the articles linked elsewhere this is between PIF (Saudi Arabia), Silver lake (American), and affinity partners (Jared kushner)

    From wiki about affinity partners:

    Kushner’s firm received commitments of more than $3 billion by the end of 2021 to invest in American and Israeli companies that are expanding in India, Africa, the Middle East and other parts of Asia. The largest investor by some margin is the Saudi government’s sovereign wealth fund, the Public Investment Fund, which has allocated $2bn of its nearly with Kushner stating that he hopes to open an “investment corridor between Saudi Arabia and Israel”,[2][3] seen internationally as a “sign of warming ties between two historic rivals”.[4] Officials who headed the Public Investment Fund objected to investing in Kushner’s firm, but Saudi ruler Mohammed bin Salman overruled those officials.[5]

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s crossplay, so it’s harder to directly estimate, but using SteamDB (so not counting being matchmade with console players) roughly 15-20k playing at any given time.

          • Psythik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Better than I thought it would be. (Steam population is all that matters to me, thanks.)

            Need a new FPS cause I’m bored of Marvel Rivals/Overwatch, PUBG, and CoD Mobile. I’ll check it out, thanks. (Fingers crossed they did Rush right this time. It hasn’t been fun since Bad Company 2.)

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh yeah, they milked that shit as much as they could. Really ruined the franchise with their bullshit.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The franchise basically created the microtransaction.

          As much flak as Oblivion got for horse armor, the Sims did it first.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          2 months ago

          Due to Steam’s Autumn Sale putting the DLC anywhere from 30-50% off, you can currently get the complete game for the low price of only… $993.79.
          I wish I was kidding.
          Screenshot of the Steam store page, showing the “Add All DLC to Cart” button with a total of $993.79. Most of the DLC is priced down anywhere from 30 to 50%.

          • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            And It won’t run.

            So many of these DLCs are outright broken. For instance, the For Rent pack very well will corrupt your save file. I’ve had a glitch happen that was a for rent glitch, and I don’t even have the pack. Dine out doesnt function, my wedding stories doesn’t function. The game is still bland with $1000 of DLC.

            It’s so bad, they added a toggle to turn off “unused packs” that break your game. You can now just uninstall them through the UI. Stuff you paid for, you can turn it off now, so your game runs more smoothly. Except, when It rolled out, it broke people’s games when they tried to use it, said they didn’t own the pack anymore, so you couldn’t turn a pack back on. Absurd.

            Fuck The Sims 4, Fuck EA.

            Rust console, is an old game, they released a new version to upgrade to new systems. Free to people who already owned the first gen game. They did this well imo. EA could never.

              • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Or just find a better game. There are plenty of games where you’re not expected to pay and download additional files to have rain.

                • NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The Command and Conquer series has only a few or no equivalent right now, as far as I know.

                  There is INZOI, which should be superior to the Sims series, but its hardware requirements are very demanding.

                  Despite the existence of superior racing sims, some people still play NFSU2 but enhanced with mods.

                  I’m saying because in some places people like the games more than the corporation owning those titles (and sitting on, while keep on selling the games with the loot boxes), they’ll just pirate those copies.

      • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I downloaded every EA game ever made and I don’t even want to play any of them. I have the files imprisoned on my computer, forever. Bwahahaha!

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m surprised that there isn’t any government organization that controls or oversees this kind of buyout, especially when so many billions are involved.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’ve never made good games. They sometimes allowed one of their devs to make a good game when they weren’t looking, but no one is perfect.

      • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        FIFA 99, Need for Speed : Underground, The Sims 2, C&C : Red Alert 2, SSX3, Black and White, LOTR 2 & 3, Burnout 3, Battlefield Vietnam, …

        There was a time when they were good, but they fell out of grace in the second half of the 2000s

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          They had a reputation for buying better companies to own the IPs and gutting the teams before the late 2000s. It’s sort of cathartic seeing that happen to them now, but not really because all the shitheels who made those decisions will probably be getting a nice payout while the actually workers will just get kicked to the curb.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They accidentally made a really good Star wars game several years ago, but when they noticed they abandoned it. All the reviews for it were basically along on the lines of, this is really good, but don’t expect any updates.

  • mohab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    226
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Saudi owning FIFA is hilarious seeing most of its profit comes from gambling. Muslims my ass 😂 Not that they ever practiced what they preached anyway—Islam or not, religion has always been nothing but a tool of oppression to rulers.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only part of the religion that matters is the part that lets them treat women as sex slaves anyways.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Didn’t as much lose it as they called FIFA (an organization worse than EA)'s bluff when FIFA wanted like a billion for the naming rights.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It would be interesting if EA pulled away from lootboxes for their owner’s ideological reasons.

    • False@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe they’ll remove the gambling. Probably not but it would be good if they did.

    • sdcSpade@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Instead of lootboxes, you cut open journalists to get your prizes.

    • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The religious skirting around the doctrines of their faith for personal gain is a feature, not a bug.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why do people always connect saudi to Islam when it’s pretty obvious no muslim other than Saudis likes the Saudi family as they are infamous for their practises. While even a slight hint at israel and Judaism or rich jewish assholes with judaism would get you down voted to the ground even when it’s an appropriate callout.

      Edit: I am not challenging the comment, i am just curious as to why. One reason I could think of is that jews are considered an ethnic group so they may not be religious at all but that could apply to any religion no?

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reddit, and by extension Lemmy, have this infatuated vision of how private companies are actually great for customers because whenever somebody asks about Steam the explanation given is that if this were a publicly traded company it would be horrendous but because it’s private everything is perfect and there are rainbows inside their offices.

      The truth is EA will be just as aggressively profit driven as it already is, the new owners will try to reduce costs just like always, and IPs that sell more will continue to be prioritized just like before.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Essentially a private company can be owned by a dickhead, or a nice person who’s not all about profitmaxing. A publicly traded company is forced to maximize shareholder value.

        Valve as a publicly traded company would quickly become another EA/Microsoft/Whatever, because it’s only the next quarter that matters. Valve under GabeN has been built to bring in large, and yet sustainable profits.

        EA’s new owners are going to be the absolute worst. So it’s going to be a worse company than before.

        Consider that Erik Prince’s murder-for-hire company is private. So is Xitter now that Melon bought it.

        So it’s not that private companies are better, but rather that they have the capacity to be better. And it all depends on the owners.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Public companies have a hard wired compulsion to increase value for shareholders. Every single decision is made with profit in mind. In the best cases you get milquetoast, inoffensive material everyone can enjoy. Ultimately, this leads to a relentless and aggressive pursuit of endless growth at any cost.

      Private companies can take a loss here and there, they don’t have to report a bad quarter and so they can plan ahead. Which allows them to do two, non explains things. That approach allows them to build a robust and loyal consumer base which is quite valuable. So they’ll sell it off again and let the public companies milk them dry. They can also get up to some horrendously evil shit behind closed doors in a foreign country where the laws only apply to people who aren’t the ruling family and never have to answer for it. Though that kind of thing is usually reserved for like, chemical manufacturers and labor intensive luxury food markets. It may be that the Saudis are just diversifying and want a propaganda mouthpiece. Or one of the royals REALLY likes FIFA.

      Hard to say.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If it’s gone public, then generally going private is a bad thing. It’s usually some investors that are going to do something bad with the company.

      A company that starts and stays private may be all the better for it (but that’s hardly assured either). If they are a success and didn’t bring a lot of investors, then it generally means they actually care about the work intrinsically.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends. This is a leveraged buyout and there are countless examples of other companies bought like this and they don’t last long.

      They take on massive debt to buy it. Then they shift that debt to the company they bought and away from the individuals. Then that company is crippled paying down interest so they can’t innovate (not that EA did), then they’ll have to cut costs and the product will diminish. Likely pay out billions in dividends to the buyers can make profit and in 5-10 years EA will go bust or get sold again.

      The banks will be left holding the bag, but probably covered their loses by that time so can write off the rest of the debt.

    • itztalal@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends on your perspective.

      This is bad from a business, creativity, and human rights standpoint.

      However, it’s good that a shitty company like EA with predatory products is going to be even more exploitative and predatory from here on out.

      I enjoy watching the useful idiots get taken for a ride.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This specific instance? Worse.

      It’s being bought by blood money (Kushner’s $2billion investment/bribe to hush up the US government about the brutal murder of a US resident journalist at the hands of the Saudis). Plus a country that somehow is even more squeamish about content than the US is in charge - look forward to way more censorship.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’ll be interesting seeing how the worst games company manages to find a way to become even worse.